General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow You'll Get Screwed If Conservatives Kill the U.S. Postal Service
http://www.alternet.org/economy/how-youll-get-screwed-if-conservatives-kill-us-postal-serviceOn April 24, members of the American Postal Workers Union (APWU) and other unions held 56 Stop Staples demonstrations in 27 different states. The postal workers, carrying signs that read, The U.S. mail is NOT for sale, were protesting against a privatization deal between the U.S. Postal Service and the office supply chain Staples.
Launched in October 2013, the deal allows non-unionized employees of 82 Staples stores to help sort mail. If the program is expanded later this year, that number could increase to 1,500 stores. In a press release, APWU said of the program, Staples employees, who work for low wages and meager benefitsand who have received minimal trainingoperate these unsecured postal counters.
APWU sees the Staples deal as a step toward much greater privatization of the U.S. Postal Service, and they are right to be concerned, not only because of the interests of postal workers, but also, because the privatization or dismantling of the U.S. Postal Service will be terrible for American consumers and small businesses.
Its no secret that times have been challenging for USPS. The increase in digital communications has resulted in many Americans spending much less on postage than 15 or 20 years ago. In 2006, a Republican-dominated Congress passed a bill forcing USPS to pre-fund future health benefits for retirees for the next 75 years (which Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has characterized as an onerous financial burden). To make matters worse, USPS has been facing the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s. And a combination of Republicans, Libertarians and neoliberal Blue Dog Democrats have been calling for drastic service cuts and privatization schemes. Ted DeHaven, budget analyst for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, has repeatedly called for the total privatization of the U.S. Postal Service.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)Gazillion in profits over people...
The gilded age has returned to the ruination of the nation!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)grilled onions
(1,957 posts)Meds by mail would be a disaster. You would get what the "delivery people" don't want. If they are rushed you may end up getting mail on the odd/even day plan. Like magazines? You may get them a week later if their turn the postal service into a mini lending library and bored delivery people find they would rather read then deliver. Pride of their job would plummet. Unhappy employees could take revenge on deliveries by arriving late or not at all. In other words your mail could be held for ransom. I want my mail delivered as we have always had it! If Congress likes this Staple kind of approach let them get it delivered this way but leave ours alone.
Exposethefrauds
(531 posts)office, it will be bi-partisan!
Zipgun
(184 posts)But in the mean time, Fox and its ilk will help keep the irrational hatred of all things "socialist" going full bore.
Exposethefrauds
(531 posts)before it even started.
meti57b
(3,584 posts)I guess we'll be back to carrier pigeons?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)except at STAPLES...
meti57b
(3,584 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)doxydad
(1,363 posts)That god awful 10 year pre-fundung ...and what other Corporation on this planet had to do that?...is the reason the USPS is in trouble. SOLUTION
Adopting a traditional pay-as-you-go method would produce an average of $5.65 billion in additional cash flow per year through 2016.
Unlike any other public or private entity, under a 2006 law, the U.S. Postal Service must pre-fund retiree health benefits. We must pay today for benefits that will not be paid out until some future date. Other federal agencies and most private sector companies use a pay-as-you-go system, by which the entity pays premiums as they are billed. Shifting to such a system would equate to an average of $5.65 billion in additional cash flow per year through 2016, and save the Postal Service an estimated $50 billion over the next ten years. With the announcement of our Action Plan in March, we began laying the foundation for change, requesting that Congress restructure this obligation.
http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/annual-reports/fy2010/ar2010_4_002.htm
Personally it would affect me as my wife was a USPS employee, and we get our medications via mail service. So yeah, I have a big stake in this, but...SO DO YOU.
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)... And why do pseudo-"conservative" Right Wing fascist privatizers hate the founders who wrote the authorization of the Post Office into Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)metalbot
(1,058 posts)"You mentioned making the service better for our customers; but the American citizens arent our customersabout 400 junk mailers are our customers. " - US Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe
Context: A startup created a service whereby they would scan your mail, then deliver the paper mail for only the things that you wanted. Interestingly, this model allows the US Post Office to win, in the sense that people will buy stamps for things that the US Post Office would never have to physically deliver (since the startup would pick up the mail and scan it). This was clearly a good thing for the consumer, but a bad thing for a Postal Service that thinks of junk mailers as its customers.
http://www.insidesources.com/outbox-vs-usps-how-the-post-office-killed-digital-mail/
Snarkoleptic
(6,002 posts)FedEx and UPS often have USPS deliver "last mile" items they don't feel are profitable enough to deliver themselves.
Without the USPS, rural and remote areas will lose daily delivery unless they pay extra for the privilege.
As for junk mail, I opted out of most of it a couple of years ago.
Now the only advertisements I receive are from local establishments and it just so happens I always buy local.
You quoted Patrick Donahoe who is a toady for Issa and the rest of the Pukes.
Nice try however.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)and available online or through a phone app. Consumers could then click on a particular scanned letter and ask that it be physically delivered, or that certain types of letters not be opened (e.g., bills etc.)."
BWAHAHAHAHAHA! YEAH, OPEN MY MAIL, WHY DON'TCHA?! Stupid idea.
Snarkoleptic
(6,002 posts)are low paid and will certainly be subject to far less scrutiny in pre-employment background checks.
It cannot be understated that Staples employees lack this-
The Postal Service demands an unwavering commitment to strong ethical values and principled decision making from all of its employees. All postal employees are required to place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principles above private gain. Section 662.1 of the Postal Service's Employee Labor and Relations Manual provides:
To ensure that every citizen can have complete confidence in the integrity of the federal government, each federal employee, including each postal employee, must respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct set forth in 5 CFR 2635 [the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch; see also Overview of Standards], 5 CFR 7001 [the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the United States Postal Service], and 39 CFR 447 [the Rules of Conduct for Postal Employees].
For questions related to Postal Service employees and the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, please call the Postal Services Ethics Helpline at 202-268-6346 or send an e-mail to ethics.help@usps.gov.
https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/legal/welcome.htm
snot
(10,538 posts). . . if you mail something thru UPS. I just assumed they passed the USPS price through to us. No wonder the UPS rate always comes out cheaper. Silly me.
Blue Owl
(50,523 posts)n/t
jwirr
(39,215 posts)now charge a lot more that we would be paying for a bank check, envelope and stamp.