Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
Tue May 20, 2014, 12:36 AM May 2014

"Ample evidence exists to show a correlation between wealth and unethical behavior"

Evidence that the Meritocracy is Made Up of Poor People
by Paul Buchheit

"Many wealthy Americans believe that dysfunctional behavior causes poverty. Their own success, they would insist, derives from good character and a strict work ethic. But they would be missing some of the facts. Ample evidence exists to show a correlation between wealth and unethical behavior, and between wealth and a lack of empathy for others, and between wealth and unproductiveness.

1. The Poor Don't Cheat As Much

An analysis of seven different psychological studies found that "upper-class individuals behave more unethically than lower-class individuals." A series of experiments showed that upper-class individuals were more likely to break traffic laws, take valued goods from others, lie in a negotiation, and cheat to increase their chances of winning a prize.

And this doesn't even begin to examine the many, many significant cases of fraudulent behavior in the banking industry. Or private equity firms that cheat their investors over 50 percent of the time. Or the many unscrupulous corporate tax avoidance strategies.

2. The Poor Care More About Other People

Numerous reputable sources have concluded that lower class individuals tend to be more generous and trusting and helpful, compared to the upper class. As people gain in wealth, they depend less on others, and thus they have less reason to understand the feelings and needs of the less fortunate. The poor are better at interpersonal relationships because they need other people.

In addition, careful studies have determined that money pushes people further to the right, making them less egalitarian, and less willing, as a practical consequence, to provide broad educational opportunities to all members of society.

One neuro-imaging analysis even suggested that the super-wealthy view photos of impoverished people as things rather than as human beings. They react to the poor not with sympathy, but with contempt."

<snip>
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/05/19-1
more fat to chew on at the link...

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
3. I'm afraid I strongly suspect that this is a) cherry-picked and b) wishful thinking.
Tue May 20, 2014, 03:15 AM
May 2014

What results you get will depend solely on what measures you take; if you look at correlation between e.g. committing most kinds of crime and wealth, you'll see that it's negative.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
4. That is simplistic.
Tue May 20, 2014, 03:44 AM
May 2014

In one of the episodes of The Sopranos, Tony's wife says. "There's a lot bigger criminals in this world than my husband, believe me."

And, as heinous as Tony is/was, I do believe her.

Many of the crimes of the wealthy are on a scale that gangsters only dream about. Well, scratch that, because some criminals whom LE acknowledges to be criminals also get very wealthy.

Many of the crimes committed by people to get wealthy and to get wealthier never make the statistics as a crime per se. And, if they do, it's a corporation who is prosecuted, not the people who caused the corporation to commit the crime or who covered it up (which is also a crime).

The addict who knocks over the local jewelry store or creates a disturbance in a barroom usually hasn't figured out how to hide behind the corporate veil.

And how do you measure killing a lake or a harbor or a river and all life in it forever because you'd rather not pay to dispose of waste properly vs. grabbing a purse? Both are inexcusable, but can we talk proportion?

And, of course, the rich don't cherry pick when they say things like 43% of Americans will never vote for me because they are takers?

I could go on, but it might turn into a sociology book instead of a post.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. Nothing you posted showed the points in the OP to be simplistic, though.
Wed May 21, 2014, 01:50 AM
May 2014

Last edited Wed May 21, 2014, 07:13 AM - Edit history (1)

 

AAO

(3,300 posts)
7. The implication is that the wealthier one becomes, the worse human being one becomes.
Tue May 20, 2014, 04:15 AM
May 2014

I think that puts the cart before the horse. Most of these people become wealthy because that is the only thing they really value in life. Normal people will choose a profession (if they can afford to choose) because they find it interesting, challenging, or of value to society. These others choose a profession that will make them rich. They only care about money. They actually find having money, and accumulating even more money to be even more important than people without money do. People without riches build a framework for their happiness that is more dependent on relationships than on things. Rich people generally get rich (not counting inheritance) because money gives them their self-worth, not human relationships. They are destined to be uncaring, unempathetic, and soulless. And these are the very people that have the most influence in our politics and society.

That's just my uneducated take.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
8. Given that many who rob, cheat and steal never get caught, it only makes sense.
Tue May 20, 2014, 06:07 AM
May 2014

Next time you drive through Millionaire Acres, just ask yourself, how many of these guys are actually white-collar criminals.... 10%, 20%...30%?

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
9. Legal eaze is afforded in their case. A Dupont raping his 3 year old daughter is a fine example...
Tue May 20, 2014, 09:06 AM
May 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024687908

I would put the percentages closer to 90% on the millionaire's club if common ethics played a role in gauging what determines robbing and cheating.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Ample evidence exis...