Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue May 20, 2014, 07:59 AM May 2014

US Military Spending and Our Bullet Trains to Nowhere

https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/05/20-0


An artist's rending is necessary, because the United States has not built one single mile of high-speed rail track. Not one. (Photo: file)

Consider this: our advanced robotic creatures, those drone aircraft grimly named Predators and Reapers, are still blowing away human beings from Yemen to Pakistan. Meanwhile, the Pentagon is now testing out a 14,000-pound drone advanced enough to take off and land on its own on the deck of an aircraft carrier -- no human pilot involved. (As it happens, it’s only a "demonstrator" and, at a cost of $1.4 billion, can’t do much else.) While we’re talking about the skies, who could forget that the U.S. military is committed to buying 2,400 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters, already dubbed, amid cost overruns of every sort, "the most expensive weapons system in history." The bill for them: nearly $400 billion or twice what it cost to put a man on the moon.

In similar fashion, the U.S. Navy, with 10 aircraft carriers afloat on a planet on which no other nation has more than two, is now building a new class of “supercarriers.” The first of them, the USS Gerald R. Ford, is due for delivery in 2016 at an estimated cost of more than $12 billion. It, too, is experiencing the sort of cost overruns and performance problems that now seem to accompany all new U.S. weapons systems. In the meantime, Washington has dispatched one of its littoral combat ships (a troubled $34 billion weapons system) to Singapore; is flying manned aircraft and drones over the Nigerian bush; and as for building national security state infrastructure of just about any sort, seldom has a problem getting Congress to pony up -- as in the $69 million now in the 2015 defense budget for the latest prison being constructed at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, meant to house just 15 “high-value” prisoners. Similarly, when it comes to the infrastructure needed to listen in on the world, the sky’s the limit, including an almost $2 billion data center built for the National Security Agency in Bluffdale, Utah. In such "infrastructural" realms, the U.S. is today without serious competition.

On the other hand, if we’re talking about purely civilian infrastructure, just consider that, at this very moment, Congress is dilly-dallying while the crucial Highway Trust Fund that keeps American roads and interstates in shape is “heading for a cliff” and projected to go bankrupt in August. This from the country that once turned the car into a poetic symbol of freedom. Meanwhile, the nation's overall infrastructure, from levees and dams to wastewater and aviation, now regularly gets a grade of D+ from the American Society of Civil Engineers.

As a rising power in the nineteenth century, the U.S. moved toward global status on the basis of an ambitious program of canal building and then of government-sponsored transcontinental railroads. Jump a century and a half and the country that, until recently, was being called the planet’s “sole superpower” has yet to build a single mile of high-speed rail. Not one. Even a prospective line between Los Angeles and San Francisco, which looked like it might be constructed, is now blocked coming and going.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Military Spending and Our Bullet Trains to Nowhere (Original Post) xchrom May 2014 OP
Oh you wanted trains with the bullets. liberal N proud May 2014 #1
... xchrom May 2014 #2
DUZY...nt Jesus Malverde May 2014 #6
Freedumb™ GeorgeGist May 2014 #3
So sad and soooo true...nt Jesus Malverde May 2014 #4
K/R marmar May 2014 #5
With the further aggravation that the COLGATE4 May 2014 #7
Now that's disgusting. woo me with science May 2014 #8
here's what we could've had if we ever got off our butts MisterP May 2014 #9

marmar

(77,081 posts)
5. K/R
Tue May 20, 2014, 08:30 AM
May 2014

London - Paris = 283 miles, 2 hours 15 minutes by Eurostar
Madrid-Barcelona = 386 miles, 2 hours, 38 minutes by AVE
Detroit - Chicago = 280 miles, 5 hours by Amtrak

Sigh.


COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
7. With the further aggravation that the
Tue May 20, 2014, 08:59 AM
May 2014

5 hours that Detroit-Chicago trip is supposed to take is only theoretical. In practice long delays are commonplace. Not unusual for it to take up to seven hours in reality.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
9. here's what we could've had if we ever got off our butts
Tue May 20, 2014, 04:09 PM
May 2014

(especially since a ROW can be upgraded to even maglev since you have the land) currently HSR is good only within 700 miles, but if Amtrak lines were given right-of-way, positive train control, and maybe a little low fencing they could hit 100 mph outside of the Rockies
TX almost had privately-built HSR by--what, 2000?--but Southwest Airlines' open-mouthed bawling ensured that loan guarantees were withdrawn, and the entirely-private Palmdale-Vegas line had its Federal loan guarantees (so Capitol Hill would need a real infrastructure lobby, or at least GOPers who don't think that "more than 4 people in a vehicle is COMMUNIST DEATH CAMPS&quot


http://sinclairthebudgie.deviantart.com/art/America-Fast-United-States-High-Speed-Rail-map-375297542

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US Military Spending and ...