Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
Thu May 22, 2014, 01:14 AM May 2014

White House Vows Defense Bill Veto Over Gitmo

WASHINGTON -- More than five years after President Barack Obama first pledged to close the military's Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba for terrorism suspects, the White House drew a new line in the sand Wednesday, vowing to veto the massive National Defense Authorization Act if Congress doesn't end restrictions on transferring detainees.

SNIP

The White House took that a step farther Wednesday evening, with spokesman Jay Carney issuing an unequivocal promise soon after Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) offered an amendment in House floor debate to close the facility, which he said costs about $2.7 million per year for each of the 154 inmates who remain there. Most of the inmates have not been charged with crimes, and about half have been cleared for release.

Here is Carney's statement:

The President applauds Ranking Member Adam Smith for his continued stalwart leadership in standing up for our values and national security by advancing the cause of closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay. By eliminating unwarranted and burdensome restrictions relating to the transfer of Guantanamo detainees, his amendment would further our efforts to move past this chapter in U.S. history. We urge the House to adopt the Smith Amendment and put an end to the ongoing harm to the nation’s security that results from the operation of the facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

This Administration has repeatedly objected to statutory restrictions that impede our ability to responsibly close the detention facility and pursue appropriate options for the detainees remaining there, including by determining when and where to prosecute detainees, based on the facts and circumstances of each case and our national security interests. In hundreds of terrorism-related cases – and as illustrated once again this week – our federal courts have proven themselves to be more than capable of administering justice.


Both statement and article continued at Link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/21/guantanamo-defense-bill-veto_n_5368912.html

What I don't understand is how they're going to get rid of the 50-some folks whose country of birth won't take them back. I know the administration has gotten some countries to take one or two of these guys at a time, but I don't know if there are enough countries who are willing to take the rest. Oh well, celebrate the ability to close first and then worry about the how later.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House Vows Defense ...