Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Algorithm Spells the End for Professional Musical Instrument Tuners (Original Post) FarCenter Mar 2012 OP
As long as pianos exist Cirque du So-What Mar 2012 #1
Correct about no subsititute! seattleblah Mar 2012 #7
Yeah, but it's still hard to lug your piano to a gig. caseymoz Mar 2012 #16
It's not just the tones. girl gone mad Mar 2012 #23
That's the same thing they said about ivory. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #24
Science marches on... Johnny Rico Mar 2012 #2
When John Henry was a little baby... jberryhill Mar 2012 #3
Some people will believe anything if it has the word "technology" slapped on it. saras Mar 2012 #4
+440 slampoet Mar 2012 #6
+2 more for the orchestral minded CBGLuthier Mar 2012 #13
Ok that was awesome... SomethingFishy Mar 2012 #17
The Reporter is a musical IDIOT. slampoet Mar 2012 #5
No you're wrong... PCIntern Mar 2012 #9
I agree... electronic tuners have been around for decades. Puzzler Mar 2012 #11
Strobes in the 70's CBGLuthier Mar 2012 #15
Me too. Even though I'd never need one I'd buy an old Conn tuner in a second if i could afford it. slampoet Mar 2012 #21
Obviously you would have to have mechanical skill to tune a piano correctly FarCenter Mar 2012 #12
Bingo... Although I will say that Gibson has SomethingFishy Mar 2012 #19
I just noticed something amazing... Speck Tater Mar 2012 #8
I foresee many broken piano strings, MineralMan Mar 2012 #10
Can always re purpose them CBGLuthier Mar 2012 #14
+440 FarCenter Mar 2012 #18
This is true. I used a four-octave set of keys MineralMan Mar 2012 #20
I used to have a Kurzweil 250 synthesizer that had a real wooden mech similar to that...... slampoet Mar 2012 #22
I'm skeptical that an electronic tuner can adjust for an enharmonic equivalent (note). no_hypocrisy Mar 2012 #25

Cirque du So-What

(25,938 posts)
1. As long as pianos exist
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 11:55 AM
Mar 2012

there will be a need for experienced tuners, who perform the nuts-and-bolts adjustments to the instruments - no task for an amateur. I don't look for electronic keyboards to replace all pianos anyway, as there is simply no substitute for the tones produced by a 'real' piano.

 

seattleblah

(69 posts)
7. Correct about no subsititute!
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 01:35 PM
Mar 2012

It's sad to see the garbage that electronic keyboard makers are allowed to push to the public. They all sound like crap compared to a real piano. Of course, they know if they allowed a real sounding keyboard out of the factory, the public would never buy a replacement keyboard. Instead, companies like Yamaha make garbage then push a new model that's slightly less crappy. If they made a good keyboard, I'd buy that and never buy another. Instead, those of us that need keyboards keep being forced to give money to these crooks for incremental improvement. This problem could be solved by the government.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
16. Yeah, but it's still hard to lug your piano to a gig.
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 03:28 PM
Mar 2012

And electronics are cheaper to make and buy, and it can do things a piano can't.

So, the electronic keyboard is dominant. Since it's also bound to evolve in the market, you might anticipate it will sound better, the question is, how quickly will it happen.

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
23. It's not just the tones.
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 04:31 PM
Mar 2012

You really can't replicate the experience of playing a 9' or 12' concert grand on a digital keyboard. I don't mean that in some kind of psychological sense, though that component probably exists. There are very significant differences in tension and control, etc., which make it physiologically easier to get a beautiful performance from a large grand than from a smaller one, let alone from a digital piano.

 

Johnny Rico

(1,438 posts)
2. Science marches on...
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 11:57 AM
Mar 2012

There isn't a lot of demand for telegraphers and buggy makers these days either.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
3. When John Henry was a little baby...
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 12:21 PM
Mar 2012

Sittin' on his daddy's knee
He picked up a hammer, a little piece of steel,
Said hammer be the death of me, Lord, Lord

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
4. Some people will believe anything if it has the word "technology" slapped on it.
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 12:58 PM
Mar 2012

The article is quite ignorant of musical physics, the out-of-tune harmonics of stiff strings, alternative temperaments, the sheer physical skill involved in tuning (and repairing, which often happen at the same time) a piano WITHOUT DAMAGING IT - in general, it reads like a high school report at best.

If you pretend that the "harmonics" of piano strings are in-tune harmonics, you will NEVER MAKE A PIANO SOUND GOOD. EVER. Even though you CAN make it show up perfectly "in tune" on a strobe tuner or other highly accurate electronic tuner.

Not worth the time it took to read it. If the "reduction of entropy" technique DOES work, it's accounting for a number of factors the author doesn't seem to understand (which is quite possible).

slampoet

(5,032 posts)
5. The Reporter is a musical IDIOT.
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 01:08 PM
Mar 2012

As someone who used to be responsible for hiring out the tuning of 45 pianos at a college music department i can tell you that pro piano tuners DO USE electronic tuners and have as long back as the 70's. They just don't DEPEND on them.

The article makes it out like this affects ALL instruments when this only affects pianos. Also the reporter forgets a VERY important issue. Even with a fancy tuning algorithm THE TUNING PEGS IN A PIANO DON'T TURN THEM SELVES.


Funny I recall the same being said by ignorant reporters once the Electronic tuners were invented.

This reporter's article will be a BOON to the piano repair industry with all the people damaging their fine instruments because a reporter who is too lazy to research told them they could replace a person with an iphone app.

PCIntern

(25,547 posts)
9. No you're wrong...
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 02:42 PM
Mar 2012

didn't you know that little angels come down from Heaven and turn the pegs? If you pray REALLY REALLY hard this is what will happen. Mr. Santorum said that and prays every night for such occurrences in his bunk bed.

just in case...things are getting scary around here...

On edit: You are exactly correct...my brother had been a performing pianist and I have been around professional tuners for every one of my nearly 60 years.

slampoet

(5,032 posts)
21. Me too. Even though I'd never need one I'd buy an old Conn tuner in a second if i could afford it.
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 04:13 PM
Mar 2012

they were hypnotically pretty.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
12. Obviously you would have to have mechanical skill to tune a piano correctly
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 03:07 PM
Mar 2012

It is the skill involved in hearing the exact pitches and intervals that make the instrument sound best that can be essentially replaced if electronic tuners become as good as the best professional listeners.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.5101

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5101v1.pdf

Besides pianos, it should be useful for organs and harpsichords, which have individually tunable notes. Other stringed instruments, not so much, since with a guitar you get whatever the frets give you, modulo some stretching.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
19. Bingo... Although I will say that Gibson has
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 03:45 PM
Mar 2012

made a guitar that tunes itself. I have yet to try it, but I hear it sort of works so piano's are probably not far behind.

That said I have never, ever used an electric tuner and not had to make a few more adjustments by ear.

People can discuss frequencies and harmonics all you like, what it boils down to is... how does it sound.

Technology in music can be a wonderful thing when used properly. It's also killing the industry at the same time. Pro-Tools, Auto-Tune, Pitch Shifters, ugh. American Idol boxes I call them.

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
8. I just noticed something amazing...
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 01:51 PM
Mar 2012

People trust technology in cases where they should not, and do NOT trust science in cases where they should. What's up with that?

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
10. I foresee many broken piano strings,
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 02:44 PM
Mar 2012

caused by non-professional tuners who are unfamiliar with using a tuning hammer. And, good luck with replacing those strings with no experience.

And then there is all that adjustment of hammer density, etc. Oh, sure...this will replace professional tuners.

The reality is that the home piano is pretty much a dead duck, replaced with electronic keyboards. If you go to your local Craig's List, there's a free piano for you, if you want one. It'll need tuning and probably some work, but you can choose from many in most cities. If you're really patient, you can find a very lovely piano that has been cared for consistently at an estate sale. Just wait for the last day of the sale and show up with the piano movers. The price will have gone down enormously from the first day. You might even get a really nice piano that needs nothing without paying for more than the move.

It's very sad. The piano sitting in a room in a home, source of many hours of children learning to play, is going away, and it's very sad, indeed. There is something about strings and cast iron and wood that sounds different in a very nice way. There is no substitute from the friendly growl from the lower octaves, initiated by a cotton hammer controlled by a finger. None. It cannot be duplicated by electronics, since every keystroke produces a unique sound. You can sample it, but the sample doesn't vary in the same way between a child's finger and an adults, nor does it vary in the same way between a professional pianist and an amateur. The sound of a piano's hammer striking the string and the muting of that string when the key is released cannot be programmed into a digital form. It changes with every note and every player.

I mourn the death of the family piano.

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
20. This is true. I used a four-octave set of keys
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 03:54 PM
Mar 2012

and the mechanisms, along with some of the wood panels, from a piano to build a clavichord from scratch a number of years ago. A very interesting project, which I later donated to a chamber music group. As far as I know, it's still in use.

slampoet

(5,032 posts)
22. I used to have a Kurzweil 250 synthesizer that had a real wooden mech similar to that......
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 04:16 PM
Mar 2012

.....MAN! that this felt good to play, like a mushy good worn in Steinway.

no_hypocrisy

(46,110 posts)
25. I'm skeptical that an electronic tuner can adjust for an enharmonic equivalent (note).
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 05:04 PM
Mar 2012

For example one string may represent G-sharp in one scale or chord but it will be "off-key" if the same pitch is used for A-flat in another scale or chord even though it's the same string. You have to nuance the pitch to fit both keys as well as being in pitch with other scales and chords.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enharmonic

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Algorithm Spells the End ...