Which bothers me since I do think the individual right to bear arms is a legitimate right worth worrying about (somewhat). I just also believe it's one right among many that needs to be balanced, which sends a certain faction of alleged 2nd amendment supporters into crazy land. As a man, I don't get remotely the worst of the vitriol.

NRA should be about gun safety but it is all about selling more guns. I own guns myself but the severe radical portion of NRA has overruled common sense, it needs to return. Some people is not capable of owning or using guns, just like some people are should never own a vehicle or drive.

As a staunch pro-RKBA'er, I agree. But the policies offered don't center on safety or reducing actual causes. The policies offered are meant to harass people who are no threat.

How many of the rampage shootings in recent memory were conducted by people KNOWN to law enforcement and medical professionals as being imbalanced? Loughner, Holmes, the VA Tech shooter, the naval yard shooter. What's the point of having more laws if the cops won't even enforce the ones they are expected to enforce?

on their backs? Is the NRA going to back laws to stop the stupidity?

A law won't stop the rampage and private establishments are free to stop such nonsense without having to wait for idiotic politicians to stop counting their kickbacks to attend to the issue.

Enforcement agencies are having their hands tied.

Honest question.

If so it's hardly a ground breaking law. And again, the private establishments can impose their own restrictions.

"allowing guns everywhere", its okay with lots of folks. Again there are some who should not possess, own or use guns, safety is not a part of being sensible. If there are groups who do not give up attempting to place safe sensible rules around guns this will never stop. Radical gun owners refusing to compromise on any sensible gun laws will continue to be a problem. Those wanting the sensible laws will continue.

the NRA literally threatens them with death.

Literally, even.

not expelling members caught doing such things, no speaking out against such activity at any time. We routinely and correctly blame the tea party when people at their rallies act out and no one says a word about it the same goes with the NRA.

That sounds like the sort of rhetoric that could snare Progressives. You might want to reconsider the tactic.

riling up people, make sure they are armed to the teeth, further make sure that we have no idea if there are criminals among them then yea you might, just might be a little bit responsible when they got batshit insane and threaten people.

When the guillotine thread posted here a day or so ago drew dozens of poster advocating revolution, confiscation and general mass-murder based solely on tax bracket the Democratic party itself was making these seditious and criminal statements.

Or maybe it was just a bunch of bloviating cranks on the internet.

and were accompanied by the active lobbying of a group to make sure that guillotines were being wheeled down our streets than maybe it would be comparable.

Here they are challenging the Dad of a murder victim to a fight

then nobody can get hurt.