Appeals court rules First Amendment protects cell phone video of cops on duty

The First Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that American citizens have the right to film police officers in public.

The federal appeals court declared that Carla Gericke was exercising her First Amendment right when she attempted to film a late-night traffic stop. Gericke was driving behind Tyler Hanslin, because she did not know the way to his home. When she saw police lights flash behind her, she assumed she was being hailed and pulled over.

Sergeant Joseph Kelley approached her vehicle and told her that he had meant to pull Hanslin over, and she moved her vehicle to a nearby parking lot. Once there, she exited her vehicle and approached Hanslin’s with her video camera, informing Sergeant Kelley that she was going to record the encounter . . .

In her suit, Gericke claimed that the wiretapping charge “constituted retaliatory prosecution in violation of her First Amendment rights,” and the First Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, writing that “she was exercising a clearly established First Amendment right when she attempted to film the traffic stop in the absence of a police order to stop filming or leave the area.”

“It is clearly established in this circuit that police officers cannot, consistently with the Constitution, prosecute citizens for violating wiretapping laws when they peacefully record a police officer performing his or her official duties in a public area,” the appeals court said.

The First Circuit Court’s decision means that Gericke’s lawsuit against the Weare Police Department for retaliatory prosecution in breach of her constitutionally guaranteed rights can proceed.


read: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/29/appeals-court-rules-first-amendment-protects-cell-phone-video-of-cops-on-duty/

related:

Obama judges tip appeals courts to Democrats -May 29, 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025018207