Krugman: Climate Action Is ‘Remarkably Cheap,’ New EPA Rules Would Give ‘U.S. Economy A Boost’
Krugman: Climate Action Is Remarkably Cheap, New EPA Rules Would Give U.S. Economy A Boost
..................
What would be the cost to the U.S. of moderate carbon pollution reductions, such as the emissions standards for existing power plants that the EPA will be announcing shortly? Its a question that we always had to answer since, as everyone knows, EPA is legally obligated to issue rules regulating CO2 from existing power plants.
In April the worlds leading scientists, economists, and governments reviewed the literature and came to the broad consensus that even aggressive climate action would reduce the median annual growth of consumption over this century by a mere 0.06%. And thats for a scenario in which the rich countries embrace rapid and sharp reductions in CO2, as opposed to the slow and modest reductions the EPA is seeking. Nor does that analysis factor in the hundreds of trillions of dollars of economic benefit from avoiding climate catastrophe or the co-benefits of mitigation (such as reduced air pollution).
In May, the worlds leading energy experts said we are headed towards catastrophic 11°F warming but that if we wanted to keep warming to a far safer level, under 4°F warming, it would require investment in clean energy of only about 1 percent of global GDP per year through 2050. And that investment would be astoundingly cost-effective: The $44 trillion additional investment needed to decarbonise the energy system
is more than offset by over $115 trillion in fuel savings resulting in net savings of $71 trillion.
Krugman explains that even the latest report by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce clearly meant to convey the impression that the E.P.A.s new rules would wreak havoc actually shows the exact opposite.
Specifically, the report considers a carbon-reduction program thats probably considerably more ambitious than were actually going to see, and it concludes that between now and 2030 the program would cost $50.2 billion in constant dollars per year. Thats supposed to sound like a big deal. Instead, if you know anything about the U.S. economy, it sounds like Dr. Evil intoning one million dollars. These days, its just not a lot of money.
As Krugman notes, our economy is at $17 trillion and growing. So what the Chamber of Commerce is actually saying is that we can take dramatic steps on climate steps that would transform international negotiations, setting the stage for global action while reducing our incomes by only one-fifth of 1 percent. Thats cheap!
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/05/30/3443254/krugman-climate-action/