Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 10:11 AM Jun 2014

If you're AT&T you shouldn't send ads talking about cable companies' customer dissatisfaction

While promoting your U-Verse.

Hell, they even came by trying to get me to sign up for their fiber optic system and telling me how much better it was than their DSL which I have.
They got an earful from me on my customer dissatisfaction with them.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you're AT&T you shouldn't send ads talking about cable companies' customer dissatisfaction (Original Post) hobbit709 Jun 2014 OP
Have you checked the speed of Uverse and DSL? Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #1
It's not the speed that's the problem with AT&T. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #2
Feel fortunate. TexasTowelie Jun 2014 #3
What they don't tell you is... malokvale77 Jun 2014 #5
I feel the same way about AT&T Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #6
uverse *is* DSL PeaceNikki Jun 2014 #8
No, they are two different things, and Uverse has much faster speeds. Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #9
I wish they would reduce my bill by 2-3 dollars a months rather than the 2-3 dollars postage they Leme Jun 2014 #4
No problem with AT&T for my cell phone coverage..We have only 2 choices for cable and... Tikki Jun 2014 #7

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
2. It's not the speed that's the problem with AT&T.
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 10:25 AM
Jun 2014

My service has gone downhill since they took over Southwestern Bell. When it was SBC, if I had a problem the phone was answered by the third ring, I didn't have to wade through 10 minutes worth of options and I talked to someone here in Austin. It never took more than 15 minutes total time to get the problem resolved. Now it takes 15 minutes to finally get a real person in India reading from a script. On the SBC website you could enter your phone number and find out if there were service problems in your area-that disappeared when AT&T took over.
Every month there's a new fee tacked on the bill. My bill for landline and 6 mbps DSL went from $50/mo 5 years ago to $85/mo now. About 2/3 of that increase is all the fees they've come up with.
Like 3 different line subscriber fees on the same two wires. Of course here the options are AT&T or Time-Warner-not much of a choice. When I dropped their long distance, since I never used it, it had gone up to $10/mo with the fees, they charged me a one time $9 fee to turn it OFF.

TexasTowelie

(112,167 posts)
3. Feel fortunate.
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 10:31 AM
Jun 2014

I'm only getting 1.5 Mbps on their broadband service in Wharton. Livestreams are impossible and Internet service hangs up if my brother is watching porn on his laptop while I'm on YouTube.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
5. What they don't tell you is...
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 11:55 AM
Jun 2014

once they disconnect that copper landline, you won't be getting it back. AT&T sucks bigtime. I just hate dealing with them.

I've told them a thousand times that I don't even own a digital television, much less have wireless equipment.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
6. I feel the same way about AT&T
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 12:05 PM
Jun 2014

Really lousy customer service on my land line for years because they were too damn cheap to replace THEIR equipment. Each time I called for service it was liking jumping through hoops just to get an appointment. Over a two year period I had at least six service calls for the same problem. A couple of the techs told me unofficially that it was a fixable problem but the company was busy rolling out U-verse.

I still have a land line through my cable provider. It's cheap and always clear sound quality. To hell with AT&T.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
9. No, they are two different things, and Uverse has much faster speeds.
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jun 2014

Uverse is capable of providing phone service, television and high speed internet, mostly on fiber.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
4. I wish they would reduce my bill by 2-3 dollars a months rather than the 2-3 dollars postage they
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 10:48 AM
Jun 2014

spend. some other time might tell of other dissatisfactions.

Tikki

(14,557 posts)
7. No problem with AT&T for my cell phone coverage..We have only 2 choices for cable and...
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jun 2014

internet here and U-Verse is not one of them.

Our cell phone bill has only gone up about $6.00 over eight years, our
cable bill, on the other hand, has gone up $35.00 in less time and that is with us
dropping equipment and channel tiers.

I see many Seniors around my parts are going to antennas..We are considering doing the same
for much of our television coverage.

The Tikkis

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you're AT&T you sh...