Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:21 AM Jun 2014

Seven Big Cases The Supreme Court Will Decide In June That Could Change America

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/06/02/3443553/eight-big-cases-the-supreme-court-will-decide-by-the-end-of-this-month/



Recess Appointments
On the eve of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, a case that could effectively eliminate the president’s constitutional authority to temporarily appoint government officials while the Senate is in recess, the Obama Administration’s position looked grim. In the lower courts, judges split entirely on partisan lines when they considered this issue — and there are five Republicans on the Supreme Court and only four Democrats. Yet the oral argument in Noel Canning went even worse for the administration than the partisan results in the lower courts would suggest. Clinton-appointed Justice Stephen Breyer said that he could not find anything in the Constitution that will “allow the president to overcome Senate resistance” to a nominee. Obama-appointed Justice Elena Kagan suggested that “it was the Senate’s job to decide” when it’s in recess.

***SNIP

Harassment at Women’s Health Clinics
A Massachusetts law creates a 35-foot buffer zone around the entrances to abortion clinics that no one may enter unless they have legitimate business within the clinic or are just passing through to reach another destination. This law prevents abortion protesters, ranging from the plaintiffs in McCullen v. Coakley — who claim that they “try to engage women who may be seeking abortions in close, kind, personal communication, with calm voices, caring demeanor, and eye contact” — to much more aggressive opponents of abortion from getting in the way of women seeking care within the clinic. They also make it harder for clinic workers to become victims of violence. According to one abortion rights activist, “[w]hat began as peaceful protests in the 1970s escalated to blockading clinic entrances, arsons and bombings, acid attacks, stalking and kidnapping doctors and their families, and even murdering reproductive health care staff.”

***SNIP

Cell Phone Searches
As a general rule, the police must obtain a warrant before they can search a person’s possessions. One long-standing exception to this rule, however, is that police may make a warrantless “search incident to arrest” — that is, when a person is lawfully arrested, the police may search the person being arrested and anything they find on the person.

***SNIP

Public Sector Unions
Public sector unions operate under two legal restrictions: they may not require non-members to fund the union’s political activity and they must bargain on behalf of every worker in a unionized shop — even if a particular worker does not belong to the union. Thus, the union may not encourage non-members to join by bargaining for benefits that only apply to union members. To recoup the costs of bargaining on behalf of non-members, however, the union may charge those non-members what are known as “agency fees.” These agency fees are now under attack in a lawsuit known as Harris v. Quinn.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seven Big Cases The Supreme Court Will Decide In June That Could Change America (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2014 OP
All very interesting cases yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #1
All will be 5-4 and the only win will be McCullen v Cookley Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #2
I cringe with every case this corrupt majority hears. mountain grammy Jun 2014 #3
+1000 heaven05 Jun 2014 #5
Yep progressoid Jun 2014 #6
I'm afraid you're correct... KansDem Jun 2014 #7
Excellent post Omaha Steve Jun 2014 #4
I need some help 90-percent Jun 2014 #8
Eliminating recess appointments could come back to haunt Republicans Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2014 #9
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. All very interesting cases
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:29 AM
Jun 2014

I am most interested in the Union case where they may stop charging non union members agency fees and the Holly Lobby case which would not force selling birth control pills to folks who do not believe in them. The whole month is going to be interesting to say the least.

mountain grammy

(26,620 posts)
3. I cringe with every case this corrupt majority hears.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:47 AM
Jun 2014

They do what they're paid to do. The rich have won this battle. 'The people' are the losers.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
5. +1000
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:03 AM
Jun 2014

we'll see more rights destroyed by a 'supreme' court that is as corrupt as they come. We're screwed in this country like that proverbial frog in the pot of water. Slowly the heat is turned up, the frog(citizen) never moves until it is dead(lost ALL) human rights. We allowed this to happen by letting Bush install himself(with the help of some of these insane 'supremes')as fascist dictator. Patriot act ring a bell? Pitiful!!!! I was loudly calling bullshit and was told it would be okay by some of my peers at the time. Are we okay???????? Civil rights, voting rights out the window. We need to step up to the plate and demand that the politicians we vote into office in our 'democracy' pass and uphold legislation that provides us ALL with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Ring a bell? Anyone???

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
7. I'm afraid you're correct...
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:22 AM
Jun 2014

If you want to know how Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will decide, just read up on what the folks who have them appear at their fund raisers believe.

Last night on Rachel Maddow, I discussed the controversy over Supreme Court justices attending political fundraisers. Specifically, Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito have been criticized for their participation in such events. Most recently, Justice Samuel Alito was identified by Think Progress at a fundraiser for American Spectator. Alito reportedly said that “it’s not important” that he attends such events. I disagree.

Alito has previously attended Spectator dinner and actually was a headliner in 2008 at a dinner used to raise money for the conservative magazine. He has also previously headlined at the fundraising dinner for the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI). Justice Scalia and Thomas have also been criticized for attending fundraisers organized by conservative oil billionaires David and Charles Koch.

I have long criticized the new model of justices represented by Scalia, Thomas and others. I prefer the model of John Paul Stevens who followed the traditional approach of avoiding public speeches except for a narrow category of law schools and circuit speeches. In a prior column, I criticized Scalia for his past speeches at conservative organizations. I feel the same way about liberal justices like Justice Ginsburg appearing in such politically charged events. However, I am unaware of Ginsburg participating in fundraisers like this one.

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/11/16/alito-criticized-for-participation-in-another-conservative-fundraiser/

90-percent

(6,829 posts)
8. I need some help
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:28 AM
Jun 2014

Fellow DY'ers, could you please do me a favor a year from now?

Could you do an executive summary of how many additional Constitutional Rights will be nullied as a result of these cases? We are losing so many so rapidly it's hard to keep up.

But, we all have to sacrifice to keep our Oligarchs, excuse me, JOB CREATORS, happy. In additional to car elevators at home, they now must have boat elevators at the yacht club. (I hear that unfortunates that don't have a boat elevator are banished from their gated communities!)

But they deserve it because they are superior human beings. You can tell by their dehumanizing excessive wealth. And perfect scores on their "Am I a psychopath?" tests.

-90% Jimmy

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
9. Eliminating recess appointments could come back to haunt Republicans
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:34 AM
Jun 2014

Last edited Tue Jun 3, 2014, 12:31 PM - Edit history (1)

But as long as it hurts Obama today (and Hillary in her all-but-certain Presidency), all's good.

Could help shine a big spotlight on GOP obstructionism though

I can't wait for the legal gymnastics that SCOTUS will use to give religious rights to corporations.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seven Big Cases The Supre...