General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn 2012, before the NSA leaks, Obama extended Whistleblower Protections to Intelligence Workers
In 2012, well before the controversy with Snowden, Congress passed the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act. This act improved whistleblower protections for government workers. An extension was specifically made to extend to Intelligence workers (CIA, NSA, etc). Guess who didn't want that extension? That's right, Republicans.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/06/11/whistleblower-protections-and-the-nsa-surveillance-leaks/
President Obama, who supported extending the protections, issued an executive directive that year allowing intelligence employees to disclose information free from retaliation under certain circumstances.
The presidents order permits federal intelligence employees to make disclosures without reprisal from supervisors, inspectors general and the director of national intelligence. The employees must believe they have evidence of waste, fraud, abuse, legal violations or dangers to public health or safety.
Republicans block the extended protections to Intelligence workers:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/almost-empty-house-approves-federal-workforce-bills/2012/10/01/b176d532-0bf4-11e2-bb5e-492c0d30bff6_story.html
But the intelligence community and jury trial provisions arent going away just because they are not in the current bill. The legislative fight for those provisions will continue, and Devine called on President Obama to use his executive authority to provide greater protections for national security whistleblowers.
Full text of Obama's executive order extending protections to Intelligence workers here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/10/11/National-Politics/Graphics/whistleblowerIC.pdf
randome
(34,845 posts)How DARE you impugn Snowden's massive intellect!!!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
You can tell by the responses, it's not well received.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Even if it does, I doubt there is anything to prevent a contractor company from taking advantage of the 'at will' employment clause that is standard in contractor employee agreements (if such an agreement even exists).
But hey, people will carry on with the claim this affords real protections to whistleblowers when the effect is the opposite.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)If you are referring to snowden, he's not covered because he didn't follow the procedure.