Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:26 AM Jun 2014

In 2012, before the NSA leaks, Obama extended Whistleblower Protections to Intelligence Workers

In 2012, well before the controversy with Snowden, Congress passed the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act. This act improved whistleblower protections for government workers. An extension was specifically made to extend to Intelligence workers (CIA, NSA, etc). Guess who didn't want that extension? That's right, Republicans.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/06/11/whistleblower-protections-and-the-nsa-surveillance-leaks/

In 2012, Congress passed legislation to expand whistleblower protections for federal workers and contractors, but lawmakers rejected a provision extending the new guidelines to the intelligence and national security communities.

President Obama, who supported extending the protections, issued an executive directive that year allowing intelligence employees to disclose information free from retaliation under certain circumstances.

The president’s order permits federal intelligence employees to make disclosures without reprisal from supervisors, inspectors general and the director of national intelligence. The employees must believe they have evidence of waste, fraud, abuse, legal violations or dangers to public health or safety.


Republicans block the extended protections to Intelligence workers:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/almost-empty-house-approves-federal-workforce-bills/2012/10/01/b176d532-0bf4-11e2-bb5e-492c0d30bff6_story.html

“Demands by a few key Republicans removed provisions for jury trials that Congress has provided for nearly all corporate whistleblowers, and national security reforms to prevent classified leaks through protection for those who act responsibly within government’s institutional checks and balances,” said Tom Devine, legal director of the Government Accountability Project, a whistleblower advocacy organization.

But the intelligence community and jury trial provisions aren’t going away just because they are not in the current bill. The legislative fight for those provisions will continue, and Devine called on President Obama to use his executive authority to provide greater protections for national security whistleblowers.


Full text of Obama's executive order extending protections to Intelligence workers here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/10/11/National-Politics/Graphics/whistleblowerIC.pdf

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 2012, before the NSA leaks, Obama extended Whistleblower Protections to Intelligence Workers (Original Post) berni_mccoy Jun 2014 OP
This will surely go over like... randome Jun 2014 #1
Heh berni_mccoy Jun 2014 #4
Does it apply to contractors? hootinholler Jun 2014 #2
Read the text. berni_mccoy Jun 2014 #3
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
1. This will surely go over like...
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:29 AM
Jun 2014


How DARE you impugn Snowden's massive intellect!!!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
2. Does it apply to contractors?
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 10:14 AM
Jun 2014

Even if it does, I doubt there is anything to prevent a contractor company from taking advantage of the 'at will' employment clause that is standard in contractor employee agreements (if such an agreement even exists).

But hey, people will carry on with the claim this affords real protections to whistleblowers when the effect is the opposite.

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
3. Read the text.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:02 AM
Jun 2014

If you are referring to snowden, he's not covered because he didn't follow the procedure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In 2012, before the NSA l...