General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI cannot attest to the veracity of this; but ...
G.O.P. chairman Rence Priebus said," We know nothing about the litter found in the alley behind our national office. We suspect this is part of an orchestrated mainstream media smear campaign. For the record, we are opposed to littering."
http://azstarnet.com/news/blogs/fitz-blog/fitz-impeach-obama-for-leaving-an-american-behind-in-afghanistan/article_6aa17163-d75e-5f2d-89d5-f28482441c00.html
The author is a political cartoonist, that has no love for republicans.
riqster
(13,986 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)When you're gonna get criticized either way, you might as well do the right thing. Which is exactly what the President did.
malaise
(268,968 posts)MurryMom
(107 posts)My favorite news headline of the past month.
This one is real.
wandy
(3,539 posts)progressoid
(49,988 posts)NBachers
(17,108 posts)Cha
(297,190 posts)Rider3
(919 posts)sheshe2
(83,751 posts)~Not!
Whether they found signs or not, the agenda was in place to trash him whatever way he decided.
Good find 1SBM
Leith
(7,809 posts)but I would NOT put it past them. It's their MO.
Brother Buzz
(36,423 posts)drm604
(16,230 posts)But very funny.
JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)why are you spreading it around? That's called slander.
We get all outraged when Republicans spread lies and/or unverified "facts" about Democrats, and then we turn around and do the same thing about Republicans. That is called hypocrisy.
Don't complain the next time that some right winger spreads bullshit about one of ours.
Brother Buzz
(36,423 posts)okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)I don't think you got to read the last sentence of the story.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)And its, properly called "satire."
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)that CANNOT be slander.
1StrongBlackMan isn't making any claim as to the truth of the rumor.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Also, Karl Rove is NOT a child molester.
And conservative cavers do NOT blow goats in ritual ceremonies.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Obama looks into Putin's eyes, see soul of Boris Badenov.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)We should have some standard of facts before posting something like this.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"I cannot attest to the veracity" part and the "the author is a political cartoonist" part?
That should have given one a hint ... or maybe I should have placed the or or thingies?
Leith
(7,809 posts)Don't DO that!
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)Must be a real pisser being a one trick pony.
Turbineguy
(37,324 posts)I came across this:
I believe the picture in the OP to be genuine. Google satellite shows a wide alley behind the building
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)or in this case, obvious satire.
Thanks for the laugh.
It sounds plausible that they would pull something like that though, lol. Well played. Had me going.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Wouldn't that exclude most of the political stuff that gets posted on this board ... and the internutz, in general?
I mean really ... what happens is people read something that their Blogger or "news-source of choice wrote ... They/we agree with what is written ... They/we post it! Very little though to whether something is "true" or not, just minimally plausible and that they/we argee with the spirit of what is written.
What would be left to post under the "know to be true" criterion ... besides pictures of puppies and kittens ... and "cool story(ies), Bro."?
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)"What would be left to post under the "know to be true" criterion ... besides pictures of puppies and kittens"
would've gotten you extra recs. Everybody knows that DU just loooves "teh kittehs".
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)My post was a joke about all those that didn't get the satire. I understand what you mean though. If we posted only what we "know" to be "true," the entire internet would read like an instruction manual with LOLcats as the illustrations, lol. That would be kind of funny, but not very interesting or sensible to expect.