Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:39 PM Jun 2014

Dianne Feinstein: No Threat To Bergdahl

Senate Intelligence Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein said she has not seen any evidence that the Taliban would have killed Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl if details of an agreement had leaked, contrary to what Obama administration officials have said.

When asked whether there was a “credible threat” on Bergdahl’s life if word had gotten out, the California Democrat responded: “No, I don’t think there was a credible threat, but I don’t know. I have no information that there was.”

Feinstein’s comments, part of an interview with Bloomberg Television’s Political Capital with Al Hunt airing Friday evening, put her at odds with White House officials. At a briefing Wednesday, administration officials told lawmakers that they couldn’t give Congress advance notice on the Bergdahl deal because the Taliban vowed to kill him if any details about the prisoner exchange came out.

Feinstein and several other lawmakers have accused President Barack Obama of violating the law — specifically, a part of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act — by not informing Congress of a prisoner exchange at least 30 days before. Top national security representatives House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) have blasted the administration for not keeping Congress in the loop. Rogers in particular said he hadn’t been briefed on Bergdahl by the White House since 2011.

Feinstein said White House deputy national security adviser Tony Blinken called her this week to apologize for not keeping her informed about the deal that returned Bergdahl to the U.S. and released five senior Taliban officials from Guantanamo Bay prison.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/dianne-feinstein-bergdahl-no-threat-107526.html#ixzz33zYgJD00

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dianne Feinstein: No Threat To Bergdahl (Original Post) Purveyor Jun 2014 OP
Wow, her nose is really out of joint about this. Laurian Jun 2014 #1
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #13
I think you're reading too much into it. DavidDvorkin Jun 2014 #14
You are definitely reading too much into this. That Laurian Jun 2014 #15
Feinstein's full of shit. octoberlib Jun 2014 #2
On a regular basis chieftain Jun 2014 #5
Oh, he wasn't gonna die, but let's leave him in captivity. boston bean Jun 2014 #3
"... I don’t know. I have no information ..." struggle4progress Jun 2014 #4
In 1985 Dianne Feinstein warrior1 Jun 2014 #6
Bergdahl was released with NO EYEBROWS. WHERE did his eyebrows go? TwilightGardener Jun 2014 #7
Dianne is making me pull out my eyebrows now... FarPoint Jun 2014 #10
Heh. Yep. TwilightGardener Jun 2014 #11
Dianne is becoming a huge boil on the ass of the DNC. FarPoint Jun 2014 #8
"but I don't know." THEN STHU!! WinkyDink Jun 2014 #9
Bush on military authorization in Iraq was credible though. LLD Jun 2014 #12
heh. SammyWinstonJack Jun 2014 #17
Oh that was way credible for ms feinstein. Damn good point, LLD Cha Jun 2014 #19
Isn't it time for Feinstein to retire and take up a hobby? dilby Jun 2014 #16
Money quote: "“No, I don’t think there was a credible threat, but I don’t know." Cha Jun 2014 #18
Where is she going with this?? Is she technically correct or caving to Republicans..I don't get it. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #20
she's sounding a lot like Grampy McFivePlanes these last few days frylock Jun 2014 #21

Response to Laurian (Reply #1)

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
15. You are definitely reading too much into this. That
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:55 PM
Jun 2014

never crossed my mind. Damn, makes one want to never post a comment. I think I will just keep my thoughts to myself from this point forward.

warrior1

(12,325 posts)
6. In 1985 Dianne Feinstein
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:00 PM
Jun 2014

Proved that she cannot be trusted with confidential information. She can go pound sand.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
7. Bergdahl was released with NO EYEBROWS. WHERE did his eyebrows go?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:01 PM
Jun 2014

I find that disturbing--he had eyebrows last winter. Was he ripping them out? And something was clearly wrong with his eyes. You have to wonder about all the stuff that could have been done to him, all the drugs fed to him to keep him compliant, how many diseases or parasites he might have, maybe months in solitary confinement or in a cage or shackles eating who knows what. Dianne clearly saw no urgency, though. I hope she burns in hell for her appalling cruelty. Bottom line, though: Congress is butthurt because the Obama administration can apparently keep a very big operation secret, one that was supposed to be stopped with the 30-day rule. He got right around them, and they can't stand it.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
16. Isn't it time for Feinstein to retire and take up a hobby?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:56 PM
Jun 2014

I am sorry but I am just getting angrier and angrier with this woman, California please rein her in.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
20. Where is she going with this?? Is she technically correct or caving to Republicans..I don't get it.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:06 PM
Jun 2014

Why so public about it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dianne Feinstein: No Thre...