Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,990 posts)
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:12 PM Jun 2014

Its about white supremacy, pure and simple.

SUN JUN 08, 2014 AT 09:29 AM PDT
Getting right down to the pure essence of the gun movement
bybrooklynbadboyFollow


Wonderful little quote in the Dallas Morning News about the latest iteration of gun freakdom:



Four days after Henry’s incident, Open Carry Tarrant held a rally in North Richland Hills. About 150 people participated. Most were men. In interviews, they revealed political leanings generally ranging from tea party to libertarian.

Nearly all were white.Participant Mark Thompson offered an explanation: Black people, he said, “are afraid to carry rifles because they’re afraid of being shot by police.”

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro/20140607-texas-open-carry-movement-raises-passions-threats.ece


This is what its always been about from the very beginning of the 'gun rights' movement. Its about white supremacy, pure and simple.



MORE:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/06/08/1305326/-Getting-right-down-to-the-pure-essence-of-the-gun-movement
84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Its about white supremacy, pure and simple. (Original Post) kpete Jun 2014 OP
Yep...stand your ground to shoot Black children if they dress wrong or have music too loud randys1 Jun 2014 #1
I think the Fascist PTB are trying to cultivate a grassroots Nazi movement Enthusiast Jun 2014 #2
More of an "astroturf" Nazi movement...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2014 #18
That's what I meant to say. Sorry. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #19
No need for an apology...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2014 #20
Exactly. Go to any gun store or show, look at the folks drooling over lethal weapons. Hoyt Jun 2014 #3
One's I'm been to were whiter than a roll of toilet paper! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2014 #27
LMAO. I've actually had gunners argue that is just not true. Ha. Hoyt Jun 2014 #34
So non- whites don't enthusiastically acquire and use guns? hack89 Jun 2014 #4
They are not anywhere near the gun consumers as scared white folks. Hoyt Jun 2014 #6
Yet they shoot and kill people at a disproportionate rate hack89 Jun 2014 #8
Definitely, but since they have access to gunz because we coddle you guys, where is your concern? Hoyt Jun 2014 #10
So as more gun are purchased gun violence increases? hack89 Jun 2014 #13
Not necessarily. Other factors are involved. Personally, I believe there would be even less crime Hoyt Jun 2014 #15
Because me buying a gun will not make you commit a violent crime hack89 Jun 2014 #16
Drinking a lot of beer and gunz are not a good idea. Hoyt Jun 2014 #17
He said he buys a lot of beer. Kurska Jun 2014 #23
Yes - with wine bottle cannons. Nt hack89 Jun 2014 #29
No shit hack89 Jun 2014 #30
I notice he never answered your question either. blueridge3210 Jun 2014 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #31
It has nothing to do with race. morningfog Jun 2014 #59
Hoyt puts the blame for America's gun violence on white legal gun owners hack89 Jun 2014 #61
Sure they are allowed if they don't mind being killed by cops. morningfog Jun 2014 #65
Care to give some examples? hack89 Jun 2014 #67
Examples of racists suggesting that black people shoot and kill more because they're black? morningfog Jun 2014 #68
Who said that? hack89 Jun 2014 #69
What about Chicago? 840high Jun 2014 #60
It's not so much about "acquiring" guns. More the purpose for doing so. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Jun 2014 #53
Now don't bring reality into this. Skip Intro Jun 2014 #63
To some extent Wellstone ruled Jun 2014 #5
And this is why ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #7
I want to make sure I understand what you are saying here. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #9
As a personal practice ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #11
yes, That is exactly what I thought you meant. Thank you for expanding on your post. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #14
K&R nt redqueen Jun 2014 #12
White supremacists ARE stupid if they supported liberalized gun laws. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #39
People are surprised? All of this you see are just different facets of the Southern Confederacy johnlucas Jun 2014 #21
Missouri southern... deaniac21 Jun 2014 #25
I heard someone call it the northernmost southern state loyalsister Jun 2014 #45
Yeah it's the borderline one now but historically it was Southern johnlucas Jun 2014 #71
A local sociologist said it's culturally more representative of the US than any other state loyalsister Jun 2014 #76
Good stuff. Hoyt Jun 2014 #32
So, the "South" liberalizes gun laws. Makes sense. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #42
More that the "MORE GUNZ EVERYWHERE" movement is rooted in a neo-Confederate ideology. n/t nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #49
I don't know about your political theory, but it's a strange Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #58
I wasn't referring to Southern states specifically. Nor even necessarily to government policy. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #64
I think anyone who is in fear for their life should take appropriate Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #72
I think they're always a potential threat. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #74
We agree. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #80
Excellent post malaise Jun 2014 #47
You are welcome malaise johnlucas Jun 2014 #70
Definitely quite a bit of truth here.....but with a few caveats. AverageJoe90 Jun 2014 #75
AGREED Mr Dixon Jun 2014 #82
Hells bells, you knew that right after Trayvon Martin was murdered. Warpy Jun 2014 #22
No shit. Iggo Jun 2014 #24
You damn skippy it is...bet they would feel differently if the rally looked like this... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #26
That'll make most gun fanciers run out and buy more ammo and gunz. Hoyt Jun 2014 #33
Yeah but they don't want THOSE guys to have guns....that's the difference... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #35
Your posts concerning 2A rights and blacks' exercise thereof are quite interesting... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #38
Look at how hard they made a big deal out of the "New Black Panther Party"....they STILL talk VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #40
"This Non-Violent Stuff'll Get You Killed," Charles E. Cobb, Jr. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #41
I know right? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #43
I remember as an adolescent Malcolm X coming on the scene. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #44
I have no inherent problem with anyone who feels they need a gun for self-defense. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #51
I don't go for it either. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #55
You honestly can't separate gun owners in general with those who carry AR-15's around in public? nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #50
Where did you come up with that? Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #56
Because you brought up black people buying guns for self-defense (which is completely legitimate) nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #57
No problem. Guilt by association is a common ploy Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #73
Doesn't bother me anymore than white women & men carrying... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #37
A lot of it. moondust Jun 2014 #28
When slaves revolted at Stono, S.C. they first headed for... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #46
They knew. moondust Jun 2014 #52
Ha! Well, when the white supremacists go after black people, Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #54
Thanks for that great link! nt raccoon Jun 2014 #83
I think the "they're (White) racists" game is about played out. Skip Intro Jun 2014 #62
This blogger is way off. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #66
"White Privelege" White Supremacy Cha Jun 2014 #77
Love the look on the guy sitting down. Just perfect. Hoyt Jun 2014 #78
I know, huh? A-Freaking-Mazing. Cha Jun 2014 #79
On this one point, firearm history is the exact opposite. ieoeja Jun 2014 #81
It at least involves an assumption of solidarity DirkGently Jun 2014 #84

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. Yep...stand your ground to shoot Black children if they dress wrong or have music too loud
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jun 2014

TURN UP THE GOD DAMN MUSIC!

[link:

|

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
2. I think the Fascist PTB are trying to cultivate a grassroots Nazi movement
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jun 2014

through the gun culture and the idiotic white supremacy fringe.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
4. So non- whites don't enthusiastically acquire and use guns?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:26 PM
Jun 2014

They hold no element of blame in gun violence?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
10. Definitely, but since they have access to gunz because we coddle you guys, where is your concern?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:02 PM
Jun 2014

Fact is, without you guys buying 10 - 12 million gunz a year, criminals would have a lot less access.

Yet, gunners don't care as long as they have theirs.
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
15. Not necessarily. Other factors are involved. Personally, I believe there would be even less crime
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:31 PM
Jun 2014

if there were less guns, certainly less shootings.

So, why don't you gun guys quit buying so many guns and promoting them?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
16. Because me buying a gun will not make you commit a violent crime
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:44 PM
Jun 2014

At least I hope you are not so weak willed.

I buy a lot of beer - am I responsible for drunk drivers?

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
23. He said he buys a lot of beer.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:26 PM
Jun 2014

Maybe he is constructing a beer fort. He doesn't have to be drinking it.

 

blueridge3210

(1,401 posts)
36. I notice he never answered your question either.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:34 PM
Jun 2014

Classic Hoyt. Ad Hominem one liners; but no substance.

Response to Hoyt (Reply #10)

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
59. It has nothing to do with race.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:27 PM
Jun 2014

They don't shoot or kill because they are black. However, they can't open carry because they are black.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
61. Hoyt puts the blame for America's gun violence on white legal gun owners
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:32 PM
Jun 2014

Apparently me buying guns causes other people to shoot people - or something like that.

And yes they can open carry - your opinions aside, can you show where black people were not allowed to open carry?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
65. Sure they are allowed if they don't mind being killed by cops.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:40 PM
Jun 2014

Or other white people, perhaps. That is the point of the OP. White people are less afraid and less at risk of getting killed by a cop who sees them walking around display a gun.

Back to my other point, a person's race has no role, plays no factor, in whether they are more likely to shoot or kill someone. None. Any such suggestion is blatant racism.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
69. Who said that?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:54 PM
Jun 2014

I never gave a reason for what is a known fact. If pressed, I would say that being desperately poor in crowded urban centers would be the reason, not the color of their skin.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
48. It's not so much about "acquiring" guns. More the purpose for doing so.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:34 PM
Jun 2014

If you own guns for hunting, target shooting, and so forth then fine, more power to you.

I assume you don't carry a semi-auto rifle around for the purpose of intimidating people, especially those of color.

Response to nomorenomore08 (Reply #48)

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
5. To some extent
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:32 PM
Jun 2014

there is a lot more going on here. It's not just the African American Community that appears to be their focus. Anyone who does not appear to be Anglo-Saxon or WASP are the true targets. BTW,many poor or homeless white people are also targeted by many hate groups. All the Gun Lobby is doing is selling GUNS,and the turmoil that this creates benefits the 1%ers. The Money Crowd knows damn well their White Aristocracy Class is under attack by we working dummies and anything that slows down their loss of power is excepttable.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
7. And this is why ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:49 PM
Jun 2014

I have discouraged those Black folks that I know who live in Texas from participating in this events ... and have discouraged Black folks that believe the teaparty lines, from appearing at teaparty events; it gives the racists cover.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
9. I want to make sure I understand what you are saying here.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jun 2014

Can you break it down a little more please.

I think I understand but, I want to make sure.

Thanks.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
11. As a personal practice ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jun 2014

I refuse to be seen as siding with those that I believe/know do not have my interests at heart, even if I agree with them on a particular issue. For example, you will NEVER hear me say anything in support of Rand Paul, even when I agree with him that the U.S. is way to involved in foreign adventurism.

Likewise, I discourage Black folks from participation in teaparty and open carry events, even if they support smaller government and less taxation, or open carry ... the other stuff these groups represent outweigh all of that.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
14. yes, That is exactly what I thought you meant. Thank you for expanding on your post.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:29 PM
Jun 2014

I hope more people read what you wrote and understand what it is being said.

You speak to something bigger than race/sex.

We are a nation divided, not so much by color - or sex - or age - or geography, so much as by a differing of fundamental beliefs.

It is what makes it so complicated. The overlap of issues is not divided by any one determining factor.

Thank you for saying what you said.

Not sure if my reply makes sense and not sure I am verbalizing what is going on with our posts here.

Something is going on though.

Something much bigger.

 

johnlucas

(1,250 posts)
21. People are surprised? All of this you see are just different facets of the Southern Confederacy
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jun 2014

Why was Clint Eastwood talking to a chair pretending it was Obama at the 2012 Republican National Convention?
Because he is one of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, that's why.
He's from California. And you know what the full name of country music is, don'cha?
Country & Western.

The South ain't just Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, The Carolinas & all that.
Southerners carried that culture out West as they killed off the natives.
That guy on the 20-dollar bill—Andrew Jackson, a big general who participated in the Trail of Tears that moved Natives from their homelands over to Oklahoma.
He's from the Carolinas, a Southern area.
Missourians took over Texas & fought the Alamo battle because the Mexicans wanted to outlaw slavery.
Missouri, a Southern state.
The whole Mexican War was pretty much a land grab by Southern slaveowners presided over by James K. Polk, the 11th President of the United States.
Incidentally James Polk was from North Carolina, a Southern state.
The spoils from the Mexican War resulted in the State of California, the New Mexico Territory (New Mexico & Arizona), & the Utah Territory (Utah, Nevada, & Colorado).
The cowboys of Texas & Oklahoma ran them cattle all the way up to Montana & back.

The South™ is the South, Southwest, & West.
Add Alaska to it too because the gold rushers of California & company ran all the way up to that icebox just as well.
It's no surprise that you see the usual suspects if you trace back the lineage.

I put together a post detailing the whole reason why our political parties formed.
It's called A long story about the Southern Strategy.
Our entire political system is based on the status of Black people & money.

So when you see a Black President, you can't be surprised with the usual suspects showing up in different guises.
Some call themselves Oathkeepers. Some call themselves Libertarians. Some call themselves Evangelical Christians.
Some call themselves Klansmen. Some call themselves Skinheads. Some call themselves Quiverfull.
Different strategies, same goal.
White Dominion. That is exactly what the Confederates themselves said as they broke off from the Union in the 1860s.

The John Birch Society? Started in 1958 in Indianapolis, Indiana by Robert W. Welch Jr.
Robert W. Welch Jr. was born in North Carolina, a Southern state.
Indiana was a stomping ground of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1910s & 1920s.

Robert Welch Jr.'s brother James O. Welch had a candy company which made Junior Mints, Sugar Daddys, Sugar Mamas, Sugar Babies, & Pom Poms.
The National Biscuit Company bought 'em out in 1963 (that's Nabisco by the way) but before then James worked for his brother Robert Jr. in the sweets game.
Robert was a candymaker too. James made his own company in 1925.
Robert later joined his brother James's company after his own company collapsed in the Great Depression (nice return of the favor) & stayed there until 1956 right before he started this John Birch Society.
From what I'm reading it's said that James distanced himself from Robert Jr.'s views.
Maybe that's why he left brother James's company.

Oh & that John Birch guy the society's named after?
A Baptist zealot who grew up in Georgia, a Southern state.
By the way country music star Charlie Daniels (The Devil Went Down to Georgia) had a song called Uneasy Rider in 1973 with a line saying "I'm a faithful follower of Brother John Birch".
The line references an outsider trying to prove that he belongs in a Mississippi redneck bar.
Incidentally Charlie Daniels of North Carolina, a Southern state, is one of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.
And you know how Charlie Daniels has spoken on the subject of Obama.

No coincidences here.
This whole country was SPECIFICALLY founded on the hierarchy of "race".
Why are people surprised by the aftereffects?
John Lucas

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
45. I heard someone call it the northernmost southern state
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:18 PM
Jun 2014

Maybe it's a wannabe southern state? It was admitted to the Union as a slave state, but didn't secede. Although, it required considerable pressure from Washington to keep it from joining the Confederacy.

 

johnlucas

(1,250 posts)
71. Yeah it's the borderline one now but historically it was Southern
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:27 PM
Jun 2014

Yeah I see there's a tug-of-war going on with Missouri.
I'll let the voices from the forums & comment boards in these links tell the full story.

From SECRant.com
Missouri is a partially Southern state

From Yahoo! Answers
Is Missouri considered a southern state?

From City-Data.com
Missouri...Southern or Midwestern?

From DixieDining at WordPress.com
Is Missouri a Southern State?

From Southern Food & Beverage at Blogspot.com
Is Missouri a Southern State?

John Lucas

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
76. A local sociologist said it's culturally more representative of the US than any other state
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:14 AM
Jun 2014

Southern MO is very much the south.
There is a big difference between the Southeast and the Southwest. Southwest being much closer sulturally to OK and TX. STL is much more eastern in architecture and linguistics than KC. KC is a midwestern cow town. The northern portion is plains.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
58. I don't know about your political theory, but it's a strange
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:20 PM
Jun 2014

brew to liberalize gun laws in order to preserve "white supremacy." Look at the history of Southern gun laws, nomore: Flashing neon prohibition for generations, followed by non-discriminatory shall-issue?? My, my.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
64. I wasn't referring to Southern states specifically. Nor even necessarily to government policy.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:38 PM
Jun 2014

Rather saying that the sort of people described in the OP are driven in large part by racial paranoia and hatred. You would swear some of them are just itching to shoot a person of color - all the more reason, perhaps, for others to promote minority gun ownership as a self-defense measure.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
72. I think anyone who is in fear for their life should take appropriate
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:33 PM
Jun 2014

measures. Should those include arms, then I will not stand in their way. I wonder if some of our gun-control advocates are so willing?

Do you think armed gangs of white supremacists are now a threat? If so, do you think those threatened should take serious counter-measures?

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
74. I think they're always a potential threat.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:41 PM
Jun 2014

And as I just said, anyone who feels they need a gun for self-defense - provided they can pass a basic background check - should be able to have one.

 

johnlucas

(1,250 posts)
70. You are welcome malaise
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:06 PM
Jun 2014

I love tracing things back to their origins.
It might not paint the whole picture but it can give you a clue on the motivations behind people's stances.

John Lucas

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
75. Definitely quite a bit of truth here.....but with a few caveats.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:24 AM
Jun 2014

Though, TBH, having looked into the Mexican-American War & Manifest Destiny myself, I've found some things that may conflict with your view on that particular thing.

The issue was, to be honest, significantly more complicated than many may realize(heck, I'll admit this was true for me, too). There were, believe it or not, a very large number of pro-slavery Southerners(such as John Calhoun, who basically had become a proto-FireEater before secession was even a thing outside S.C.!) who wanted the U.S. to go no further than just Texas(or even the eastern half of Texas), because they feared, greatly, that if enough territory was taken, that it might lead to the end of slavery(and, luckily, that's exactly what happened; the admission of California tipped the balance in that regard!).....and a significant number of Northerners supported it for that very same reason(amongst others, of course).

Also, Antonio de Santa Anna, unlike Abe Lincoln 25 years later(who, unlike Santa Anna, truly *did* abhor slavery), had absolutely *NO* intention of actually ending slavery in Texas(as wonderful as that would have been). Not at all. In fact, had the Texians not been so insistent on independence, it's quite likely that slavery would have survived for at least as long as Santa Anna, or his cronies, remained in power, possibly even a little longer.

There's also the matter of Polk: many give him credit(or deride him, depending on who one asks) for being the primary force behind annexation. In all honesty, however, this is actually not all that accurate. Polk, more than anything, was merely one who went with the flow. Under the particular circumstances that developed, such annexation really could have happened with just about any President, yes, even Henry Clay, who was originally quite hesitant to follow public opinion, the majority in favor of Manifest Destiny at that time.

So yeah, I hate to seem like I'm endlessly nitpicking, so apologies in advance. Just thought I'd offer my two cents, that's all.






Warpy

(111,255 posts)
22. Hells bells, you knew that right after Trayvon Martin was murdered.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:20 PM
Jun 2014

The NRA echo chamber was silent as a tomb. If Martin had been white, they'd have been shrieking for parents to buy their suburban children guns to protect themselves on Skittles runs.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
33. That'll make most gun fanciers run out and buy more ammo and gunz.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:28 PM
Jun 2014

Would love to see those guys walk into a gun show. That would be a great reality tv bit. Well, until someone gets shot .

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
35. Yeah but they don't want THOSE guys to have guns....that's the difference...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:01 PM
Jun 2014

If those guys showed up at their little restaurant gimmicks.....they would crap their camouflage pants

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
38. Your posts concerning 2A rights and blacks' exercise thereof are quite interesting...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:55 PM
Jun 2014

and should be part of the debate. Please, let's pursue this.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
40. Look at how hard they made a big deal out of the "New Black Panther Party"....they STILL talk
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:12 PM
Jun 2014

about those 2 guys outside the polling station on election day....just those 2 guys who were unarmed if I remember correctly scared the bejeezus out of them so much that they cannot forget them!

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
41. "This Non-Violent Stuff'll Get You Killed," Charles E. Cobb, Jr.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:20 PM
Jun 2014

This book is just now out. Cobb, a former SNCC Field Secretary and Visiting Professor at Brown, recounts the often hidden history of the armed African American defense of civil rights workers in the South, and how terrorists like the KKK were pulled up short by the very real threat of armed resistance. Probably won't fit the narrative around here.

NPR Interviewed him last Friday. Very eye-opening to even this pro-2A Democrat who has taken the time to read some fairly recent history.

If white supremacy is at the core of "gun rights," then it is hugely curious how the South's gun laws have been liberalized!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
43. I know right?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:41 PM
Jun 2014

Just goes to show you how really really nervous they are....and why they manage to fumble and shoot themselves so often!

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
44. I remember as an adolescent Malcolm X coming on the scene.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:00 PM
Jun 2014

I was at first skeptical as to how is approach and that of MLK's would augment each other, so I listened. When the "militant" Malcolm spoke about self-defense in the black community, and the need for arms, I shrugged and wondered what all the fuss was about. Made sense to me.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
51. I have no inherent problem with anyone who feels they need a gun for self-defense.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:53 PM
Jun 2014

They should obtain a CCL. This open carry stuff - especially with assault rifles - is insane.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
57. Because you brought up black people buying guns for self-defense (which is completely legitimate)
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:18 PM
Jun 2014

in response to the OP, which is specifically about people carrying rifles around to intimidate others. Hence, you seemed to be conflating gun owners and "gun rights" in general with the most extreme "open carry" folks.

My mistake, though. I didn't mean to misrepresent your views.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
73. No problem. Guilt by association is a common ploy
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:38 PM
Jun 2014

in these threads.

Some folks should check their logic, however, when it comes to a hated enemy they think is on the brink. If they are that threatening, then it will behoove those threatened to take measures. Some of those threatened may be black.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
37. Doesn't bother me anymore than white women & men carrying...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:51 PM
Jun 2014

Keep in mind the contoversy in Texas is over LONG guns; handguns are regulated by the concealed-carry laws. So the 2 guys in the middle might be subject to arrest in Texas.

BTW, I support concealed and not general open-carry.

moondust

(19,979 posts)
28. A lot of it.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:09 PM
Jun 2014

Descendents of the slave patrols using guns to intimidate and terrorize. See: Django Unchained.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
54. Ha! Well, when the white supremacists go after black people,
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:10 PM
Jun 2014

you should give that little story to those blacks, lest they get the wrong idea about self-defense.



Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
62. I think the "they're (White) racists" game is about played out.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:34 PM
Jun 2014

Hopefully it will soon be completely played out.

I doubt many are left who buy that kind of simplistic bullshit.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
66. This blogger is way off.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:40 PM
Jun 2014

He wonders what happened in the 1960s that gave birth to the gun movement.

I'll tell you -- the 1968 Gun Control Act. It was the beginning of contemporary gun control and ushered in 25 years of restrictions. And then the legislative pendulum swung in the mid 1990s.



Cha

(297,196 posts)
77. "White Privelege" White Supremacy
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:29 AM
Jun 2014

White Privilege on parade..


Casey @pari_passu
Follow

What if this situation were reversed? This is what #WhitePrivilege looks like: #p2 #tcot
12:41 AM - 6 Jun 2014
327 Retweets 184 favorites

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
81. On this one point, firearm history is the exact opposite.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:09 PM
Jun 2014

Gun control really took off when the Black Panthers started openly carrying to protect Civil Rights workers from police abuse in cities in the North.

Conversely, the NRA helped train people in Black communities in the South where the police ignored (or participated in) murderous attacks by the KKK.

Historically, RKBA was on the right side of this fight.


On the other hand ... I don't recall the last time I saw a firearms debate where the RKBA side did not turn racist. Largely, I assume, because "those people" are why they feel the need to be armed at all times in the first place.

That said, the person quoted in the OP was speaking as far from racist as you could possibly get. Noting that Blacks are unfairly treated vis-a-vis RKBA is not campioning that fact. To the contrary. The person quoted in the OP appears to be speaking out AGAINST the unfair treatment of African-Americans. At the very least, he can actually see the racism that is occuring which would be unusual for a racist.

It is unusual to see someone on the Left confusing racial for racist. The other side does that all the time. Which makes sense for them. Noting a simple race based fact, like African-Americans are more susceptible to Sickle-Cell Anemia, is a racial statement. Given that they actually believe their insult, a racist statement, is factual, they are incable of seeing the difference between racial and racist.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
84. It at least involves an assumption of solidarity
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:18 AM
Jun 2014

... with the other "armed citizens," that's for sure. All that mockery of how silly it is for people to be nervous around gangs of rightwing white guys with guns would evaporate pretty quickly were the "Peaceful Islamist Open Carry Club" members to show up at the same Taco Bells and Chili's at some point. Or, needless to say, "the New Black Panthers."

Again, all of this perfect for the gun lobby. At some point, everyone will need to be in own their local, narrowly politically-defined open carry group, like softball teams or bowling leagues, but with guns and strong, conflicting political opinions.

What could possibly go wrong?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Its about white supremacy...