Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:40 PM Jun 2014

Human Rights Watch’s Revolving Door

[font size="2"]Human Rights Watch’s Revolving Door
Group’s edicts and positions have often been suspiciously in line with US policy
by Belén Fernández


Kenneth Roth, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch, speaks during
the annual press conference of the non-governmental organization in Berlin, Germany,
Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2014. (Credit: AP Photo/Michael Sohn)


Let’s pretend that we want to start an organization to defend the rights of people across the globe that has no affiliation to any government or corporate interest. Which of the following characters should we therefore exclude from intimate roles in our organization’s operation? (You may choose more than one answer.)


  • An individual who presided over a NATO bombing, including various civilian targets.

  • An individual who was formerly a special assistant to President Bill Clinton, a speechwriter for Secretaries of State Warren Christopher and Madeleine Albright and a member of the State Department’s policy planning staff who in 2009 declared that, under “limited circumstances, there is a legitimate place” for the illegal CIA rendition program that has seen an untold number of innocent people kidnapped and tortured.

  • A former US Ambassador to Colombia, who later lobbied on behalf of Newmont Mining and J.P. Morgan — two US firms whose track records of environmental destruction would suggest that human wellbeing falls below elite profit on their list of priorities.

  • A former CIA analyst.


If you answered “all of the above,” you’re one step ahead of Human Rights Watch, which has played institutional host not only to persons matching descriptions A–D but to many others with similar backgrounds.

Javier Solana, for example, was NATO secretary general during the 1999 assault on Yugoslavia, an event HRW itself described as entailing “violations of international humanitarian law.” Solana is now on the group’s Board of Directors.[/font]

Continued at commondreams.org:
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/06/09-5
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Human Rights Watch’s Revolving Door (Original Post) newthinking Jun 2014 OP
What better way for the corporate State to confuse human rights than by taking over what are seen to newthinking Jun 2014 #1

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
1. What better way for the corporate State to confuse human rights than by taking over what are seen to
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 03:06 PM
Jun 2014

be trusted organizations acting in the public good?

Do we get how dangerous things are getting yet? Organizations like HRW can be used to muddle and confuse people and disconnect them from very real human rights issues and crisis.

What happens when a corporate money "cabal" runs all three branches of government as well as major international rights organizations? Is there really any objectivity left in such a situation? Especially when the revolving door includes the Military industrial complex?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Human Rights Watch’s Revo...