General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConfirmation that Nixon Scuttled the Vietnam Peace Talks
Absolutely, says Tom Charles Huston, the author of a comprehensive, still-secret report he prepared as a White House aide to Nixon. In one of 10 oral histories conducted by the National Archives and opened last week, Huston says there is no question that Nixon campaign aides sent a message to the South Vietnamese government, promising better terms if it obstructed the talks, and helped Nixon get elected.
Nixons campaign manager, John Mitchell, was directly involved, Huston tells interviewer Timothy Naftali. And while there is no evidence that I found that Nixon participated, it is inconceivable to me, says Huston, that Mitchell acted on his own initiative.
Hustons commentstranscribed and publishedon the web site of the Richard Nixon Presidential Library in Yorba Linda, California on Wednesdayare the latest twist in a longstanding tale of political skullduggery involving Nixon and his predecessor, Lyndon Johnson. It is a tale that features a secret X-file, a mysterious Dragon Lady and reports of wiretaps and bugging that has captured the imagination of scholars and conspiracy theorists for half a century.
Like many of Nixons actions, this particular transgression was born of paranoia. As the 1968 election approached, Nixon and his aides feared that Johnson would try to help the Democratic nomineeVice President Hubert Humphreyby staging an October surprise. When LBJ announced to the nation, just days before the balloting, that he was calling a halt in the bombing of North Vietnam to help fuel progress in ongoing peace talks, the Republicans thought their fears were realized.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/yes-nixon-scuttled-the-vietnam-peace-talks-107623.html#ixzz34HFM2z46
rurallib
(62,414 posts)Thom Hartmann plays the tape of LBJ talking to Ev Dirksen about this.
about 40 seconds in
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)when I heard the news earlier today.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)What can be done?
90-percent
(6,829 posts)That's easy.
Look forward, not backward.
-90& snarky jimmy
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)if he wasn't already dead.
tclambert
(11,085 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)We need to dig up Nixon's grave and fill his casket with bullshit.
Then we need to dig up Reagan's and fill his with horseshit.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)well, it was a tape released by the 'LBJ library recently, but its UTTERLY CHILLING!
If you wanted to prosecute Richard Nixon posthumously for treason, this one tape alone would do it.
It is an utterly remarkable historical artifact that could be considered more historically important than the secret tapes that broke the watergate scandal.
-90% Jimmy
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Same people, same playbook.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)...Gulf of Tonkin for the War Party.
btrflykng9
(287 posts)it's not exactly a surprise.
QC
(26,371 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)The papers Nixon sought concerned his effort to sabotage the peace talks. I believed it from the first moment I heard it.
Sam
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)well documented, in the past 15 years through FOIL, that Nixon was after material related to his role in planning the Bay of Pigs, and related materials.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)and saved a million people. He chose to be president instead.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Boomerproud
(7,952 posts)Watergate was only partly about political dirty tricks. Only Carl Bernstein will admit it, Woodward is still protecting a Republican.
DirtyDawg
(802 posts)...damn war went on another four years and another 20,000 American soldiers, sailors and airmen died...and the tapes/transcripts that Johnson had of Nixon's conversations that confirmed his treason in this peace sabotage were what the Watergate burglars were looking for when they got caught. Damn Republicans.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)JFK until 1969 and RFK until 1977.
The world would have been completely different and better.
Johnson and Nixon...
tclambert
(11,085 posts)super high-speed trains, most electric power plants would run on hydrogen fusion (and the hydrogen would come from seawater, so no wars for oil), the working poor could live on minimum wage without food stamps, NO REAGAN, air traffic controllers would still have a union, Wal-Mart would be unionized, no S&L bailout, no Wall Street bailout, we would have gotten out of the Vietnam War years earlier--before the massive escalation, so no John McCain or Sarah Palin, electric cars would be everywhere, the remaining oil companies would be little boutique operations, no fracking, we would still believe "no one is above the law," no Nixon, no Bushes, no Cheney, Gorbachev would have ended the Cold War much sooner, peace would guide the planets, and love would steer the stars.
erronis
(15,242 posts)Unfortunately, I had to come back to our sordid little reality. Thanks, anyhoo.
tclambert
(11,085 posts)That song "Age of Aquarius" from 1967, the musical Camelot (and we called Kennedy's administration Camelot), and Star Trek--we used to dream of beautiful futures. Now our visions of the future look like Elysium and Ender's Game and The Terminator. The masses will live in sordid slums. The super rich will live lives of luxury, but always afraid of the others who live outside their guarded gates. That is, if the killer robots don't annihilate us.
Sometimes I wonder if a parallel universe exists in which Kennedy ducked that day in Dallas. What would it be like? And who do I see about submitting my transfer request?
erronis
(15,242 posts)Building 3684A, wing E, cell 42, bunk D.
I liked your combination of our dreamy-eyed view of utopia from the 60's and the dystopian view of a scorched earth with walled communities of the blessed few afraid to venture out because of the ruin they have brought to the world. Of course we had our own hells (thanks to many greedy bastards like Nixon) in the 60s and 70s. Kennedy was not totally stinkless but might have had a lot more vision and less paranoia. I had the dis/pleasure of meeting both of these men and can attest to a visceral difference in how they affected people.
Sounds like you've read a bit of Stephenson and Atwood. I had to visit the dystopian wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dystopian) for reference. It reminded me of so many great works of science fiction that predicted the present and will likely be considered prescient by future generations, if there are any.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,361 posts)Thanks for the thread, phantom power.
G_j
(40,367 posts)many already knew this. I've posted about it in the past