Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Ultimate Guide to Shutting Down Conservative Anti-Piketty Hysteria
http://www.alternet.org/economy/ultimate-guide-shutting-down-conservative-anti-piketty-hysteria***SNIP
Claim: Piketty is a dirty Marxist
There are two Marxes. One, a scholar of capitalism of repute, put forward testable hypotheses, some of which you may accept, some of which you may reject. The other is a conservative boogeyman, the human representation of all they find evil. If they dislike something, it must be Marxist.
James Pethokoukis, a formidable writer, went full hack for his National Reviewreview,
Thanks to Piketty, the Left is now having a Galaxy Quest moment. All that stuff their Marxist economics professors taught them about the inherent contradictions of capitalism and about historys being on the side of the planners all the theories that the apparent victory of market capitalism in the last decades of the 20th century seemed to invalidate well, its all true after all.
How to respond: Most times someone drops the M-Bomb, he is intending to be provocative. With enough effort, you can make almost anything Marxist. While Marxists dont agree on everything, and the term is very nebulous (Marx once said he wouldnt describe himself as a Marxist), there are some pretty established rules for determining if someone is, indeed, a Marxist. First, he generally doesnt write things like,
Marxist analysis emphasized the falling rate of profit a historical prediction that turned out to be quite wrong (Capital in the 21st Century, page 52)
Marx usually adopted a fairly anecdotal and unsystematic approach. (Capital in the 21st Century, page 229)
Marx evidently wrote in great political fervor, which at times lead him to issue hasty pronouncements from which it is difficult to escape. That is why economic theory needs to be rooted in historical sources (Capital in the 21st Century, page 10)
Marx totally neglected the possibility of durable technological progress and steadily increasing productivity. (Capital in the 21st Century, page 10)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 631 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Ultimate Guide to Shutting Down Conservative Anti-Piketty Hysteria (Original Post)
xchrom
Jun 2014
OP
daleanime
(17,796 posts)1. I simply ask.....
have you read the book?
No? Then your not qualified to judge it.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)2. James Pethokoukis is an AEI wonk and a CNBC favorite.
Not exactly what you call "unbiased", there . . .