General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCharles Pierce: The Bowtied Monster (George Will)
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/24162-the-bowtied-monster-george-will
n 1977, while awarding him that year's prize in distinguished commentary, the Pulitzer committee said about George F. Will that he was "at home with a wide variety of topics, from international relations, campaigns, and urban problems to the history of machine guns and the vagaries of the press." This was before Will was recognized as the thoroughgoing disgrace to the craft of journalism that he is, before we knew that he was a working advisor to the Reagan campaign in 1980 while masquerading as an independent observer in his column and for ABC. It was before he proved himself to be a big old 'ho for the crooked Conrad Black. It was before he proved himself to be a smug, petulant dilettante who is willing to flirt with racism -- Go back and study his coverage of the Jesse Jackson campaign in 1988 -- and who is willing to throw himself whole hog into climate change denialism, and, now, today, at Hiatt's House Of Hacks, George Will is someone who has nothing better to do than mock the current movement on America's campuses to try and cope with the problems of rape and sexual assault, and trolling its victims while jacking it into his dogeared copy of Bartlett's. For laughs.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)brer cat
(24,565 posts)txwhitedove
(3,928 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)maindawg
(1,151 posts)but George Will has a pole in his ass that goes right into his brain ! That is why he cannot turn his head.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Glenbeckistan.
Kr for someone finally taking on Poindexter
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Gives off kind of a pervy vibe.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)in Washington DC, and in the years I worked there I saw and waited on many Politicos.
At the time George Will's mother lived in a city we flew to so I saw him a couple of times when he came in to meet her. He was simply the crabbiest human being I'd ever met. Just not very pleasant at all.
I know this isn't a profound insight, but I can still see all too clearly his sour, self-involved expression.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)...that's very interesting. Who and how he is when he thinks no one is looking.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)people who are more or less invisible to him, such as an airline ticket agent.
Over the years I saw or waited on lots of politicians and other public figures. I will say that the very nicest one ever was Jay Rockefeller. He had a somewhat complicated change to make in a multi-part ticket, back when they were still all written by hand. He came up to the counter by himself, explained what was happening, and behaved like some otherwise ordinary citizen while I changed his reservation and rewrote the ticket. I'm so sorry he never had a serious run for President.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)...would have better than Reagan or Bush 1. But I'll never trust a Rockefeller. Scratch one and you get Mitt Romney.
Nice observation though. Hope you write your memoirs.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I worked from January, 1969 to August, 1979. It was the best possible time, in my opinion, to have worked. We were decently paid. Flights were rarely full and so it was possible to non-rev (fly for free as an airline employee) most of the time. I also worked for a small airline where I had far better travel benefits than if I'd worked for one of the big ones. I took full advantage of the travel benefits, and I'm very glad I did. Oh. And we were almost always boarded in First Class. Nice.
I will say that my memoirs would only touch a little on the well-known people I encountered, although they would be included. I'd like to try to convey a sense of what that job was like. It was brutally difficult in many ways, and it got a lot harder after deregulation. These days it's much worse than when I worked, and because flights are always full the employees who want to travel can't do so, certainly not in the way I could. I would never recommend the job to anyone these days.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)...stands for a much bigger story about work in America and the plight of working middle class people. Hope you'll give it a try because you describe the non-measurable quality of relationships between people in general and between (some) employers and employees back in our very brief golden age: 1950 until Reagan. Life was more livable and that's hard to describe, but stories like yours capture some of it. ^^
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)people were part of the middle class. We really were working class, passing for middle class because we wore shirts and ties, dresses for the women. We didn't get our hands dirty, although we were shift workers. It was the golden age. We sort of knew it even then. One of my co-workers said more than once that no matter how hard the job was (and it was often very hard) so long as he wore a shirt and tie to work he knew he had it good. His perspective helped me understand what we had.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)That's what working people have---mostly only oral history. Their lore and spirit. Studs Turkel would love it.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I said that we airline employees would gather in bars late, after work, and share our worklore with each other. In many ways the stories we told each other involved archetypes and such.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Or co-write it. Or group-write it. Start a blog for the lore and wisdom of working people. Or maybe it already exists and you could add on. I have to research this myself 'cause I'd like to read it.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)But maybe that's the approach I should take to my memoir, treat it as worklore.
Several years ago I tried writing it and it was truly awful. I was too smugly inside the experience to shape it in any sort of interesting way. Perhaps I should try it as fiction.
tblue37
(65,357 posts)toward those who served them their food and drink--had something to do with the willingness of a server to use his phone to videotape Romney's 47% remark. I remember reading that the guy who taped Romney was offended by his snooty, dismissive attitude. Obama, on the other hand, is often seen smiling at and shaking hands and chatting with doormen, wait staff, etc.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)He told that lie for the first 2 years of the Tea party's existence.
Paladin
(28,257 posts)GreatCaesarsGhost
(8,584 posts)Blew up an outhouse and a teacher's car. IIRC.
Source: "The Clothes Have No Emperor" by Paul Slansky
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)He finally fell off the cliff.
He's always been one first class asshole.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)mountain grammy
(26,621 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
Asshat's also good........
JHB
(37,160 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Appreciate Pierce bringing up his Reagan con, Conrad Black and Jesse in this piece. To hell with George Will then and now!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)include stats on violence that had been derived from "capacious" definitions of sexual assault:
Combine this with capacious definitions of sexual assault that can include not only forcible sexual penetration but also nonconsensual touching. Then add the doctrine that the consent of a female who has been drinking might not protect a male from being found guilty of rape. Then comes costly litigation against institutions that have denied due process to males they accuse of what society considers serious felonies.
Now academia is unhappy about DOEs plan for government to rate every institutions educational product. But the professors need not worry. A DOE official says this assessment will be easy: Its like rating a blender. Education, gadgets whats the difference?
For shits and giggles, if a DUer wanted to see who else on DU is decrying this new rating system, and blaming the President, the Secretary of Education, and the DOE, they could google the phrase I have bolded in the helpful little box up at the right that admin has provided.
To the Jury...it's not against the TOS to refer to prior postings....the admin gave us a helpful little search box to do so.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)This post was from May. Your PM today referred to it and said that I would be quoted in your new post whether I responded or not. I never read George Will's post about rape. My post was about academics not rape or violence. I do not think reports on rape and violence should be kept secret, but they should be separate from academic performance reports.
This is a stretch I think.
You said:
For shits and giggles, if a DUer wanted to see who else on DU is decrying this new rating system, and blaming the President, the Secretary of Education, and the DOE, they could google the phrase I have bolded in the helpful little box up at the right that admin has provided.
To the Jury...it's not against the TOS to refer to prior postings....the admin gave us a helpful little search box to do so.
Yep that's me and lots of others join me in protesting the way schools and colleges are being "graded" and "evaluated."
So go ahead and have your "shits and giggles". The new intense education reforms are opposed by many on both left and right. That is no secret. I try to mind my business here, I do not attack others. But I will speak up in my own defense.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)I do not think reports on rape and violence should be kept secret, but they should be separate from academic performance reports.
Really? I find this viewpoint abhorrent, madflo. It allows administrators to escape responsibility for how women and minorities are treated on their campuses....and still get federal funding. Are you really advocating that places that are unsafe for women should get rewarded by retaining their ability to offer student loans?
President Obama's reform would take away money from campuses that do little about racial violence, sexual assault, and hazing. That's a damn good thing, and any Democrat should be proud of that.