Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHagel: Game, set, and match!
I don't know how anyone could argue with Sec Hagel's opening remarks.
But we know they will.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1301 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hagel: Game, set, and match! (Original Post)
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
OP
Bergdahl hearing, on MSNBC now. Or probably on CSPAN online, though I have not confirmed. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#2
Bergdahl is not currently charged with any crime and that we don't leave anyone behind. I
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#4
not sure what that means - I am referring to the "deteriorating condition" explanation
DrDan
Jun 2014
#7
panader0
(25,816 posts)1. What opening remarks?
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)2. Bergdahl hearing, on MSNBC now. Or probably on CSPAN online, though I have not confirmed. nt
warrior1
(12,325 posts)3. what did he say?
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)4. Bergdahl is not currently charged with any crime and that we don't leave anyone behind. I
will keep a look out for video.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)5. so why in the world spin it otherwise . . . . jeez louise
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)6. Three words: black Dem President
DrDan
(20,411 posts)7. not sure what that means - I am referring to the "deteriorating condition" explanation
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)9. Why not? nt
DrDan
(20,411 posts)10. I was referring to the WH "deteriorating condition" explanation as to why the exchange was made
that never made sense to me - simply state, as Hagel has done, we DO NOT leave troops behind . . . . period . . . no more explanation necessary, and who can question that?
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)8. Yep. nt