Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stinky The Clown

(67,818 posts)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:17 PM Apr 2012

Yesterday Biden said the Supremes would keep ACA. Now Obama says he thnks so, too.

Obama made a fairly broad and sweeping statement that was a good way to frame the notion of the Supremes voting on a popularly passed law.

He pointed out that conservatives don't appreciate activist judges and that to overturn ACA would be unprecedented activism.

All very good.

Are Obama and Biden confident in their predictions or whistling past the graveyard?

I can't stop thinking back to the lesser bushbaby and the unbridled activism of the Felonious Five.







Whenever I talk about ACA I think about how the repubs like to tell us how unpopular it is when polled.

That's a specious argument. While there are right wingers who hate any attempt to help those with less than them, there are also those of us who don't like ACA because it didn't go far enough. For those of us in the latter group, we mostly don't want it overturned so much as expanded. Why can't the right wing poll on a question framed *that* way? It is likely impossible to find a wider chasm than the one that exists between me and the right wingers who want this bill overturned.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yesterday Biden said the Supremes would keep ACA. Now Obama says he thnks so, too. (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Apr 2012 OP
The supreme court has always considered themselves above the will of the people. seattleblah Apr 2012 #1
Because the majority are Republican political hacks, they will rule, not for Obamacare, but Old and In the Way Apr 2012 #2
Their government provided insurance is Blue Cross Blue Shield. RC Apr 2012 #3
Aha. They got a sign from one of the supremes flamingdem Apr 2012 #4
They're working the refs pscot Apr 2012 #5
They are as clueless as any of the pundits ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #6
 

seattleblah

(69 posts)
1. The supreme court has always considered themselves above the will of the people.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:24 PM
Apr 2012

I wouldn't be so sure they wouldn't rule against it just to exert their power.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
2. Because the majority are Republican political hacks, they will rule, not for Obamacare, but
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 11:33 PM
Apr 2012

for corporate health ins, care. They know the system is broken and can only be addressed by universal mandate. It's either by government or private ins. They opt for private insurance for us...but they'll keep their gov. provided ins., thank you very much.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
3. Their government provided insurance is Blue Cross Blue Shield.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 11:39 PM
Apr 2012

A private company. and They pay part of the premiums.

flamingdem

(39,320 posts)
4. Aha. They got a sign from one of the supremes
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 11:41 PM
Apr 2012

They voted yesterday, so just guessing that there was an...indication made.

Good news.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
6. They are as clueless as any of the pundits
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 10:12 AM
Apr 2012

Otherwise the integrity of the court's deliberation process has been compromised. Not a good thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yesterday Biden said the ...