Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBusiness group sez Seattle's minimum wage law violates their free speech.
Industry Group Files Lawsuit Seeking to Kill Seattle's Minimum Wage, Claiming It Violates Their Free Speechhttp://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/315-19/24218-industry-group-files-lawsuit-seeking-to-kill-seattles-minimum-wage-claiming-it-violates-their-free-speech
Last week, Seattle Mayor Ed Murray (D) signed a bill that will eventually raise his citys minimum wage to $15 an hour. It took eight days for a lobbying group representing major employers like McDonalds and Taco Bell to file a lawsuit asking the courts to repeal the legislation.
In a sensible world, this lawsuit would have no chance of prevailing. Many of its claims are frivolous and comically so. The lobbying group argues, for example, that Seattles new minimum wage violates the First Amendment because by increasing the labor costs of franchisees, the Ordinance will reduce the ability of franchisees to dedicate funding to the promotion of their businesses and brands. In other words, the law requires businesses to spend money paying workers a living wage that they could otherwise spend on advertising, and this somehow violates the Constitutions guarantee of free speech. If this were actually what the Constitution required, then any law imposing costs on anyone would be unconstitutional, including all taxes. After all, every dollar paid in taxes is a dollar that cant be spent to buy an ad promoting the deliciousness of the Big Mac.
The crux of the lawsuit, however, is rooted in the way Seattles minimum wage ordinance treats franchised businesses as opposed to other employers. The ordinance contains two different schedules for large and small businesses that phase in the higher minimum wage at a different pace. Many large businesses, defined as all employers that employ more than 500 employees in the United States, are required to pay a $15 minimum wage by 2017, while smaller businesses do not not reach this milestone until 2021. Franchises, such as an individual McDonalds restaurant, are treated as part of the larger company. So, because McDonalds as a whole employs over 500 employees, each individual McDonalds franchise is also subject to the same schedule that applies to large employers.
The lawsuit primarily objects to this decision to classify individual McDonalds restaurants and other franchises as part of the whole, and it offers several legal challenges to this classification that can generously be described as imaginative. It argues for example, that, by treating franchisees of out-of-state companies like McDonalds differently than mom-and-pop hamburger shops, the Seattle law violates a constitutional doctrine prohibiting states from discriminating against out of state businesses. This argument would have merit if franchisees of in-state companies like, say, Starbucks were treated differently under the minimum wage ordinance than McDonalds franchisees. They arent. This claim has no merit.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 670 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Business group sez Seattle's minimum wage law violates their free speech. (Original Post)
eridani
Jun 2014
OP
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)1. And what about the free speech of employees?
By underpaying their workers, they deny them free speech through participation in donating to candidates.
Turn about is fair play.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)2. money=speech denying the workers money is denying speech
this is why most lawyers should be fed to the sharks