General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRedefining 'school shootings' so they don’t count
http://www.theguardian.com/news/oliver-burkeman-s-blog/2014/jun/12/gun-lobby-tactic-redefining-school-shootingsThe gun lobbys new tactic: redefining 'school shootings' so they dont count
If youd lost the capacity to be appalled by those opposing reform of Americas gun laws, their latest effort should fix that
The drumbeat of news about gun violence in the United States is so steady and rhythmic these days that its starting to fade into the background. Another week, another school shooting. One of the biggest risks now is of a population-wide numbness, eroding the will to tackle the crisis. So perhaps we should be grimly grateful whenever the gun lobby demonstrates that it retains the power to horrify.
Case in point: this sequence of tweets by the conservative journalist Charles C Johnson, featured on Glenn Becks website The Blaze and on Hot Air, and being forwarded enthusiastically everywhere among pro-gun tweeters and bloggers. (I found it via Quinn Norton.)
Johnson takes it upon himself to debunk the claim, made by the gun reform group Everytown for Gun Safety, backed by Michael Bloomberg, that there have been 74 school shootings since Adam Lanza killed 20 children, six adults and himself at Sandy Hook elementary School 18 months ago. In fact, Johnson concludes, there have only been seven. How does he manage this feat of mathematical magic? Simple: by narrowing the definition of school shooting so far that almost none of them count.
Lets be fastidiously fair to Johnson and his supporters by acknowledging that a handful of the incidents he identifies do seem misclassified. Most people, for example, would surely agree that a shooting that doesn't happen on a school campus isnt a school shooting. But the rest of his alleged debunkings offer a truly depressing glimpse of how pro-gun argumentation works these days.
..more..
90-percent
(6,829 posts)In this age of everybody is entitled to their own facts, it gets exasperating to determine what those facts actually are!!!! My opinion is that progressives are in favor of facts, and conservatives tend to be just fine with truthiness. But I'm a big fan of facts and logic and I dont want our side practicing any of the misleading half truths that have wrecked our national discourse.
Wierd this really perturbs me and my DU community doesn't seem alarmed? I was daydreaming about doing "oppo research" posts on DU, but the last time I tried, I think I got voted off, as most of the jurors determined that I was a misinformation spreading right wing troll.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025088746
-90% jimmy
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)The right-wing gun lobby is very adept at manipulating "statistics," and have been doing so for ages.