Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 07:28 PM Jun 2014

ISIS Claims Massacre of 1,700 Iraqi Soldiers

New claims circulated on the radical militant group's Twitter and social media accounts purport to detail mass graves and brutal killings, in a gruesome propaganda campaign

Aryn Baker @arynebaker
3:04 PM ET

New claims circulated on the radical militant group's Twitter and social media accounts purport to detail mass graves and brutal killings, in a gruesome propaganda campaign

In a series of tweets and shocking photos posted to their social media sites, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is boasting to have slaughtered 1,700 Iraqi soldiers in the past week as the militant Islamist group continued its blitzkrieg towards Baghdad.

The alleged massacre, as well as the body count, has not yet been verified, but if proved true it would be the single largest act of mass killing in a war that now spans Syria and Iraq. Even if exaggerated, the claims are potent propaganda designed to terrify their opponents and pre-empt resistance as the al-Qaeda inspired group consolidates control in Iraq’s Sunni areas.

It also may be designed to inflame sectarian tensions, all but demanding a response from the country’s Shiite militias in an effort to launch a sectarian war that could end up redrawing the map of the Middle East.

The photos, some 60 in all, start with rather benign images of loot — ammunition, Humvees, trucks and weapons — captured from Iraqi army bases that were abandoned by fleeing soldiers. It appears that they were taken over the past week in Salahuddin Province. Tikrit, the principal city (and former President Saddam Hussein’s hometown) was captured by ISIS on June 12.

The photos go on to show a grim slide show of men described in taunting captions as soldiers caught “trying to flee the battles in civilian clothing.” Bloodied corpses stain the ground in at least five different locations, and several of the photos document firing squads garlanded with the black ISIS flag preparing to kill scores of handcuffed men packed in shallow graves.

more...

http://time.com/2878718/isis-claims-massacre-of-1700-iraqis/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ISIS Claims Massacre of 1,700 Iraqi Soldiers (Original Post) Purveyor Jun 2014 OP
more proof of the true value of religion nt msongs Jun 2014 #1
"Religion" per se doesn't mean "Not cruel or evil." And "Islam" doesn't mean "peace," either. WinkyDink Jun 2014 #2
Katyn'. Igel Jun 2014 #3
Aren't these guys nilesobek Jun 2014 #4
These are the folks Samantha Powers wanted to arm last year AngryAmish Jun 2014 #5
No telling where the arms end up. moondust Jun 2014 #6
It looks like we are arming both sides in any conflict for profit. nilesobek Jun 2014 #7
Kind of like the Iran/Iraq War back in the 1980s? bullwinkle428 Jun 2014 #10
The question is malaise Jun 2014 #8
I doubt it. nilesobek Jun 2014 #9

Igel

(35,307 posts)
3. Katyn'.
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jun 2014

Proof of the true value of ideology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

By that measure, ideology trumps religion 10 to 1.

Or if you don't like that it was "leftist" forces perpetrating the massacres and war crimes, you can look to nationalist forces of Japan in China or elsewhere. Or the fascist forces of Hitler. Or the populist forces of Pol Pot.

Suddenly this seems to be a human trait, not a religious one, or a leftist one, or a rightist one. Unite a strong belief system with a sense of moral righteousness of your cause and the moral wrongness of the other guy's cause, and you're set up for massacres.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
4. Aren't these guys
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jun 2014

our "Syrian resistance allies," or some other neo-con truthspeak? Apparently, according to news reports, they have been supplied American weapons.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
5. These are the folks Samantha Powers wanted to arm last year
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 08:36 PM
Jun 2014

Get that Butcher out of our government.

moondust

(19,981 posts)
6. No telling where the arms end up.
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 08:50 PM
Jun 2014

Even if you have the best intentions and want to arm the "good guys":





I guess the MIC makes its profits no matter who ends up with the weapons.

ISIS has also apparently overrun some Iraqi military bases and now they're riding around in Humvees and who knows what else after robbing a bank for $425 million.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
9. I doubt it.
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 08:59 PM
Jun 2014

When they are making obscene profits from arming both sides in a conflict then why would they care who wins or loses? They will just await the next rounds of conflict, arm both sides and count the money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ISIS Claims Massacre of 1...