Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 05:12 AM Jun 2014

Should Wind Turbines Be Allowed To Kill Eagles? Debate Ratchets Up With Bird Group Lawsuit

An ongoing debate among U.S. environmentalists over whether wind turbines should be allowed to kill eagles ratcheted up a notch this week.

The American Bird Conservancy sued the Obama administration Thursday over a new federal rule that the group says could threaten already vulnerable populations of bald and golden eagles. The rule allows wind energy companies to obtain 30-year permits to kill or injure eagles without fear of prosecution, extending previous permit limits by 25 years, the Associated Press reported.

The U.S. Interior Department announced the extension in December after wind energy developers sought the change to reduce their liability. Officials reasoned that longer permits would simultaneously promote wind energy development and reduce impacts on federally protected eagles. They “will help the renewable energy industry and others develop projects that can operate in the longer term, while ensuring bald and golden eagles continue to thrive for future generations,” Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell said at the time.

But more than 100 wildlife and conservation groups, along with the U.S. National Park Service, railed against the changes. “It is entirely conceivable, and probably even quite likely, that mortality impacts to eagles will get far worse” under 30-year permits, George Fenwick, president of American Bird Conservancy, said in a December statement.

link:
http://www.ibtimes.com/should-wind-turbines-be-allowed-kill-eagles-debate-ratchets-bird-group-lawsuit-1607240

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Wind Turbines Be Allowed To Kill Eagles? Debate Ratchets Up With Bird Group Lawsuit (Original Post) rpannier Jun 2014 OP
Ugh. I have such mixed feelings about wind in my neck of the woods cali Jun 2014 #1
It is a difficult thing rpannier Jun 2014 #2
You can have wind power.. sendero Jun 2014 #3
The Only Two Options rpannier Jun 2014 #4
"strikes against building windows alone account for anywhere from 97 million to nearly 976 million" Chathamization Jun 2014 #14
I have to agree, imthevicar Jun 2014 #7
I hate wind power. Slaughtering innocent birds is vile. Vattel Jun 2014 #5
And I agree we're in a problem situation rpannier Jun 2014 #6
Eagles? no. Cats? Absolutely! nt Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #8
How many eagles are killed by wind power vs the number killed by other energy sources liberal N proud Jun 2014 #9
No it isn't. Stop pretending and trying to lump it in with crazy rpannier Jun 2014 #10
But no one wants to compare the mortality of the traditional sources of energy liberal N proud Jun 2014 #11
Yeah, it is. Scuba Jun 2014 #12
How many animals are killed each day by the trucking industry? CBGLuthier Jun 2014 #13
All human activities affect the environment. MineralMan Jun 2014 #15
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. Ugh. I have such mixed feelings about wind in my neck of the woods
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 05:26 AM
Jun 2014

I dislike the NIMBY stuff, but there's been alarming info that I believe stands up to scrutiny. I don't think these guys should be permitted to kill and injure eagles with impunity- or bats.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
2. It is a difficult thing
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 05:29 AM
Jun 2014

ON the one hand, wind power is better than fracking and fossil fuels, but it does create environmental problems by potentially damaging native animal populations.
Pr4oviding these companies with long term protection against the damage they cause is not one of the solutions (IMO)

sendero

(28,552 posts)
3. You can have wind power..
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 05:39 AM
Jun 2014

... and kill some birds, or fossil fuels and kill...... everything.

There is no free lunch.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
4. The Only Two Options
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 05:57 AM
Jun 2014

There couldn't be an endless sea of options available?
There are only two?!

A recent study by federal and state scientists found that U.S. wind turbines could kill up to 1.4 million birds of all species per year by 2030 as the wind energy industry continues to expand.
An AP investigation in 2013 documented dozens of eagle deaths at wind farms.

Maybe looking at the whole environmental situation instead of throwing out bumper sticker slogans is a better way to handle it.
I would have hoped that concerns raised by the U.S. National Park Service, conservation and wildlife groups might at least cause you to take some pause at the idea of giving these companies 30 year permits to kill or injure without fear of prosecution



Chathamization

(1,638 posts)
14. "strikes against building windows alone account for anywhere from 97 million to nearly 976 million"
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 08:00 AM
Jun 2014

"The government estimates that strikes against building windows alone account for anywhere from 97 million to nearly 976 million bird deaths a year."

"Nationally, domestic and feral cats kill hundreds of millions of birds each year, according to the government."

"The government estimates that strikes against building windows alone account for anywhere from 97 million to nearly 976 million bird deaths a year. Cars kill another 60 million or so. High-tension transmission and power distribution lines are also deadly obstacles. Extrapolating from European studies, the Fish and Wildlife Service estimates 174 million birds die each year by flying into these wires. None of these numbers take into account the largest killer of birds in America: loss of habitat to development."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/science/18birds.html

But don't pay any attention to those! What you should really worry about are the much smaller fraction killed by wind turbines. Eh...

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
5. I hate wind power. Slaughtering innocent birds is vile.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 06:25 AM
Jun 2014

In the long run, I hope solar saves the day, but right now our options suck.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
6. And I agree we're in a problem situation
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 06:29 AM
Jun 2014

The 30-year protection is way too much
5 years is enough and they can reapply later
The country keeps getting into this long term contract nonsense with these companies because the companies complain that they need long-term protections -- which has essentially meant anything goes

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
9. How many eagles are killed by wind power vs the number killed by other energy sources
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 06:50 AM
Jun 2014

Nuclear, Oil, Coal?

This is an insane attempt to stop the rise of green energy.

Next thing they will try and tell you is that wind turbines cause hurricanes and tornados.

I actually did overhear some crazy old lady once telling her friends that there was never any windy days until they put those windmills up. This was in NW Iowa where there are hundreds of wind turbines scattered across the region. My only guess was that she watched FOX.


rpannier

(24,329 posts)
10. No it isn't. Stop pretending and trying to lump it in with crazy
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 07:05 AM
Jun 2014

Conservationists, environmentalists and the National Park Service are all weighing in on this and oppose giving these companies a 30-year protection from any liabilities

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
11. But no one wants to compare the mortality of the traditional sources of energy
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 07:12 AM
Jun 2014

Only to criticize that which threatens those traditional big energy sources.


"Fatalities of golden eagles at modern wind facilities represent only two percent of all documented sources of human-caused eagle fatalities, while only a few bald eagles have died in collisions in the history of the industry."

Other studies have found that wind farms are responsible for a variety of bird deaths, but ultimately concluded that their avian death toll is negligible when compared to that of other power plants.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/13/wind-farms-eagle-deaths_n_3915629.html



CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
13. How many animals are killed each day by the trucking industry?
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 07:50 AM
Jun 2014

Should we shut down interstate commerce and go back to hauling freight on barges because of the mortality rate of animals?

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
15. All human activities affect the environment.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 09:28 AM
Jun 2014

There is no technology that does not harm something, and wind power is no exception. We must balance benefits against harm, and compare one means of power generation with another. Power lines kill eagles. People with guns kill eagles. Trucks kill eagles. People doing things kill eagles and have other deleterious effects on the environment.

That's the bottom line.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Wind Turbines Be A...