General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIraq: Reality eclipses hope
From the front page of today's Times.
The journey from then to now is a tale of premature celebration and dashed hopes. A president who thought he had set Iraq on a more stable course that could be sustained without American help has now determined that American diplomacy and power are critical to saving it. Tired of war, like most Americans, he found his aspiration to move on bedeviled by forces tearing across a region in a story punctuated by miscalculation and missed opportunities.
The withdrawal ceremony on that winter day in 2011 was, in the end, the result of a failed negotiation. In theory, both Mr. Obama and the Iraqi leadership wanted a small American detachment to stay behind. In reality, neither side was enthusiastic and seemed just as happy that a dispute over legal conditions scotched the deal.
The residual troops would not have been a combat force, but might have mounted counterterrorism missions and helped Iraqi forces gain better intelligence on the militants. Whether it would have made a difference is impossible to know, but will be a subject of debate for a long time
Botany
(70,501 posts)n/t
pscot
(21,024 posts)we have a moral obligation to those poor bastards, but it's a clusterfuck for sure.
bradla
(89 posts)I am sure Americans would be happy about troops continuing to die in Iraq. Screw that place.