the naming names part, I mean.

Dang!

embarrassed when you tell me, but I've really no clue!

Judge on 5th Circuit Court of Appeals panel, just hearing oral argument in an 'Obamacare' appeal, who told counsel for government to explain, in writing, within 48 hours, 3 pages, single-spaced, President's (administration's) position on 'judicial review,' after judge heard POTUS' statement about role of Supremes in reviewing Affordable Care Act.

Story's in here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/101489399

Judge Smith engaged in abuse from the bench.

I'm not sure what you are talking about
but I know he called you out on his show.

so sic'em!!

I hope to respond to his criticism, beyond his complaint that I referred to wiki, which, in this case, had it right, of course. Been out of town, so need a couple days to get back into things.

He called out your DU moniker, that's hardly calling out names. I've got to admit you were included in a list of not so cool DUers so maybe that's why you are miffed.

I'm angry that he was as wrong as he was, having thought he was well-respected for a reason.
I was #1 in his rant. I'm not 'miffed,' its more important than that.

DUers, but it's my private list and I don't share it with anyone. However, have you tried to call into his show or show up on his website message board to address this and tell him directly? He has named DUers names in the past, but only in praise so I guess him being critical was a departure, so call him and talk to him directly.

I'm an attorney, and I plan to educate him, in a 'lawyerly' way, in writing.

Maybe you can give me links? E.mail address? Website?

I will not aid and abet you on this. You are being childish. Since you are a lawyer, do your research.

of the facts, or lack thereof, of something he said, loud, on the public airwaves???
Thanks

If you write him, most likely someone else on his staff will read and reply. But it's up to you.

You've really got it wrong, Cleita; I'm seeking to educate Hartmann.

When lawyers talk about "educating" it usually means sue. Perhaps you need to pull back your rhetoric. If you really want to educate Hartmann, call into his show. He will talk to you. He talks to all kinds of people who disagree with him. He is respectful. He is heard all over the country and overseas, so if you want to put him down and educate him, that's the way to do it.

so he can understand the way the legal system works, and use his knowledge usefully, in the future. This will require, imo, something like a legal brief; I will make it brief. Not conducive to a phone call.

However on the air you usually are allowed a few minutes so it will be brief anyway. Try mail if that's what you really want. I doubt if you will convince him though. A polite confrontation voice to voice would be more effective IMHO. It's your choice.

I may post what I write to him, after I've written it, but I plan to write him directly, and inform him about the law. I don't want to discuss or debate with him.

Or is it a private thing to Thom?