Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:27 PM Jul 2014

Obama Admin Debates Whether Assad Really Must Go

If you thought politics made for strange bedfellows, wait 'til you see what war brings.


Obama Admin Debates Whether Assad Really Must Go
Now that the U.S. government and the Syrian regime are both fighting ISIS in Iraq, the faltering U.S. drive to topple Assad is in even more peril.

There’s a battle raging inside the Obama administration about whether the United States ought to push away from its goal of toppling Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and into a de facto alliance with the Damascus regime to fight ISIS and other Sunni extremists in the region.

As President Obama slowly but surely increases the U.S. military presence on the ground in Iraq, his administration is grappling with the immediate need to stop the ISIS advance and push for a political solution in Baghdad. The 3 1/2-year grinding civil war is Syria has been put on a back burner for now. Some officials inside the administration are proposing that the drive to remove Assad from power, which Obama announced as U.S. policy in 2012, be set aside, too. The focus, these officials argue, should instead be on the region’s security and stability. Governments fighting for survival against extremists should be shored up, not undermined.

“Anyone calling for regime change in Syria is frankly blind to the past decade; and the collapse of eastern Syria, and growth of Jihadistan, leading to 30 to 50 suicide attacks a month in Iraq,” one senior Obama administration official who works on Iraq policy told The Daily Beast.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/03/iraq-crisis-pushes-u-s-closer-to-assad-the-dictator-it-said-must-go.html?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=cheatsheet_morning&cid=newsletter%3Bemail%3Bcheatsheet_morning&utm_term=Cheat%20Sheet
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Admin Debates Whether Assad Really Must Go (Original Post) Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 OP
Josh Rogin basically works for McCain and the GOP Senate. TwilightGardener Jul 2014 #1
I'm sure McCain's bloodlust remains unsated. I, however, see no reason for the US to get involved Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #2
Announcing "Assad must go" was super-dumb. That was a TwilightGardener Jul 2014 #3
No arguments here. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #4

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. Josh Rogin basically works for McCain and the GOP Senate.
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:34 PM
Jul 2014

I have noticed this since he was at Foreign Policy. Notice the extensive quotes of McLame here. All of Rogin's "scoops" are tailored to help bash Obama.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
2. I'm sure McCain's bloodlust remains unsated. I, however, see no reason for the US to get involved
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:39 PM
Jul 2014

with Syria or against Syria.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
3. Announcing "Assad must go" was super-dumb. That was a
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jul 2014

Clinton/Petraeus/Panetta idea that I'm sure Obama has regretted adopting ever since. We should have basically stepped back and let the Arab Spring blow up and then flame out without any encouragement from us. Trying to effect regime change (including Qaddafi) was stupid and created a vacuum for jihadist activity.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Admin Debates Wheth...