Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,749 posts)
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 09:30 PM Jul 2014

"New Military Testimony Suggests Different Attackers In Benghazi Assaults"

New Military Testimony Suggests Different Attackers In Benghazi Assaults

AP at the Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/09/benghazi-attack-suspects_n_5572481.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

"SNIP.......................


WASHINGTON (AP) — Newly revealed testimony from top military commanders involved in the U.S. response to the Benghazi attacks suggests that the perpetrators of a second, dawn attack on a CIA complex probably were different from those who penetrated the U.S. diplomatic mission the evening before and set it ablaze, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens and another American.

The second attack, which killed two security contractors, showed clear military training, retired Gen. Carter Ham told Congress in closed-door testimony released late Wednesday. The assault probably was the work of a new team of militants, seizing on reports of violence at the diplomatic mission the night before and hitting the Americans while they were most vulnerable.

The testimony, which The Associated Press was able to read ahead of its release, could clarify for the first time the events of Sept. 11, 2012, that have stirred bitter recriminations in the U.S., including Republican-led congressional investigations and campaign-season denunciations of the Obama administration, which made inaccurate statements about the Libyan attacks. The testimony underscores a key detail that sometimes has been lost in the debate: that the attacks were two distinct events over two days on two different buildings, perhaps by unrelated groups.

The U.S. government still has not fully characterized the first attack in which, according to Ham and eight other military officers, men who seemed familiar with the lightly protected diplomatic compound breached it and set it on fire, killing Stevens and communications specialist Sean Smith. A disorganized mob of looters then overran the facility.




.......................SNIP"
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"New Military Testimony Suggests Different Attackers In Benghazi Assaults" (Original Post) applegrove Jul 2014 OP
Sounds like the military is really not sure. Why the hell should the WH be sure in weeks 1 to 3 applegrove Jul 2014 #1

applegrove

(118,749 posts)
1. Sounds like the military is really not sure. Why the hell should the WH be sure in weeks 1 to 3
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 09:37 PM
Jul 2014

after the event.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"New Military Testim...