Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 06:24 PM Jul 2014

O.C.G.A. § 16-5-25 (2014): "...any opprobrious or abusive language used by the person..."

In reference to: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5258397

I got to thinking of this Georgia law, that I learned about in 1981. Here's the citation:

§ 16-5-25. Opprobrious or abusive language as justification for simple assault or simple battery


A person charged with the offense of simple assault or simple battery may introduce in evidence any opprobrious or abusive language used by the person against whom force was threatened or used; and the trier of facts may, in its discretion, find that the words used were justification for simple assault or simple battery.

HISTORY: Laws 1833, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 786; Code 1863, § 4576; Code 1868, § 4597; Code 1873, § 4694; Code 1882, § 4694; Penal Code 1895, § 103; Penal Code 1910, § 103; Code 1933, § 26-1409; Code 1933, § 26-1306, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1.


http://web.lexisnexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&view=full&interface=1&docinfo=off&searchtype=get&search=O.C.G.A.+%252525A7+16-5-25

Of course, the father beating up the accused rapist is not directly analogous to this, but I thought of this law.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»O.C.G.A. § 16-5-25 (2014...