Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 02:42 PM Jul 2014

Oil refinery threatened by sea-level rise, asks government to fix problem (not The Onion)

Here’s an ironic case in point, via the Sierra Club’s blog: An oil refinery in Delaware is asking taxpayers to pay for protecting it from rising sea levels. The refinery is on the waterfront, and rising tides and extreme storms could threaten it. The federal Coastal Zone Management Act provides grants to states for projects such as building out natural barriers, like dunes, to protect against storm surges. Delaware has such a program in place. And now the oil refinery, after contributing to climate change for more than 50 years , is coming with its hand out.

http://www.grist.org/climate-energy/oil-refinery-threatened-by-sea-level-rise-asks-government-to-fix-problem/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oil refinery threatened by sea-level rise, asks government to fix problem (not The Onion) (Original Post) WilliamPitt Jul 2014 OP
I get irony and understand that mitigation might make shore erosion worse bigtree Jul 2014 #1
Oh really, travesty of outcomes mrdmk Jul 2014 #2
kick / rec think Jul 2014 #3
Let 'em have the money. But first deduct every penny they've spent denying climate change. LiberalEsto Jul 2014 #4
LOL. nt conservaphobe Jul 2014 #5
During the BushCo years this would have been handled with a phone call. lpbk2713 Jul 2014 #6
Two words for PBF Energy gratuitous Jul 2014 #7
Holy Muthah Pussbucket! MohRokTah Jul 2014 #8

bigtree

(86,008 posts)
1. I get irony and understand that mitigation might make shore erosion worse
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 02:49 PM
Jul 2014

. . . I do wonder, why we can't demand these companies pay for their own protective measures or cease operations. Lacking any such responses, I can't help think we'd wish we'd either demanded those actions or even supplied the resources if something catastrophic did occur.

mrdmk

(2,943 posts)
2. Oh really, travesty of outcomes
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 02:53 PM
Jul 2014
Irony Alert: A Delaware Oil Company Feels Threatened by Sea Level Rise

Oil companies seem to think they have the most to gain by denying climate disruption. Just look at the lengths that the oil-rich Koch brothers have gone to in order to suppress climate action, spending and saying anything to derail any policy tackling the climate crisis.

Why? Well, carbon pollution caused by burning fossil fuels is a key cause of the climate crisis -- and without action, they’ll be free to drill, extract, frack, refine, transport, and burn oil as much as they want. Apparently, it’s easy for them to ignore the cascade of problems their polluting behavior creates when they’ve got profits to be made. But, as it happens, such irresponsible, deeply flawed logic eventually comes full circle.

In Delaware, severe storms are eroding the shoreline and affecting homes and businesses up and down the coast - including the business of an oil refinery. The functioning of the Delaware City Refining Company property just south of New Castle, a division of PBF Energy, is threatened by increasing extreme weather. In other words, climate disruption is hitting the doorstep of its source.

link: http://sierraclub.typepad.com/compass/2014/07/irony-alert-a-delaware-oil-company-feels-threatened-by-sea-level-rise.html
 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
4. Let 'em have the money. But first deduct every penny they've spent denying climate change.
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 04:43 PM
Jul 2014

Any money they've spent on buying ads, supporting climate change-denying politicians, hiring lobbyists, etc.

lpbk2713

(42,769 posts)
6. During the BushCo years this would have been handled with a phone call.
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 04:49 PM
Jul 2014



Cheney would have personally seen to it Halliburton would
have been awarded an emergency no-bid contract.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. Two words for PBF Energy
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 04:56 PM
Jul 2014

The second one is "you." Time for the Almighty Free Market to intervene here, methinks. Those stalwart captains of industry shouldn't be looking for handouts. Makes 'em all dependent and stuff. Maybe next time they'll make better choices on siting their refinery and putting such a heavy carbon load in the atmosphere. It's for their own good, really.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oil refinery threatened b...