General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPutting women's faces on US Currency? President Obama wants it.
Here's my suggestion of a subject for the first bill, perhaps the $10 bill, complete with an image suitable for use as an etching. The subject? Harriet Tubman, someone whose name is known for her work in the area of human rights. I think she'd be a great first choice.
Response to MineralMan (Original post)
Post removed
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)I believe that women should be represented on our currency, so I suggested a women who would be an excellent choice. The added benefit of tweaking the noses of the right-wingers with my suggested image is not accidental, either.
One of the rules is that no living person can be depicted on US currency.
I'm not much interested in sarcastic humor about this issue, frankly.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You learn something new every day.
Personally, I think your suggestion is a sound choice.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)because living royalty in England was always on the currency there at the time. The rules were set because of that. No Kings or Queens in the United States.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)They were:
Alabama Governor Thomas E. Kilby (1921 Alabama Centennial commemorative half dollar, issued 2 years after the actual centennial)
President Calvin Coolidge (1926 US Sesquicentennial commemorative half dollar)
Arkansas Senator Joseph T. Robinson (1936 Arkansas Centennial commemorative half dollar, 2nd version)
Virginia Senator Carter Glass (1936 Lynchburg, Virginia commemorative half dollar)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver (1995 Special Olympics commemorative dollar)
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)Harriet Beecher Stowe.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Sarcasm is not always the best response to a serious thread, I think.
Harriet Beecher Stowe, however, is a worthy suggestion. Thanks for moving back on topic.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)Though I agree Tubman is an excellent choice.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)in general. That factor always plays a role in such selections.
yesphan
(1,588 posts)Reagan be put on paper money long before any woman. I believe they want to replace Roosevelt on the dime with his "beloved" image.
alp227
(32,055 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)And that the second must be as well shows just how much resentment there is toward something so basic.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)first replies to a serious proposal bothers me, too.
Too bad. But there are also serious replies.
I started a new thread to give the subject another chance, and began with an actual suggestion of a person to honor to help get it off on a good start.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)If so, I'd recommend you edit your post.
Response to KitSileya (Reply #21)
Post removed
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)And did you not mean it as a put-down of current American society, saying that Americans are too stupid to agree with the President, and that a 'mongo' would be a more fitting choice to represent said stupid people?
No, I think I read you correctly. And I think those of us that try to make it socially unacceptable to use slurs, such as those used against people with Down's Syndrome, would agree that you have shown your true colors.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)doesn't list the meaning you infer. The word "mongo" is generally used as an adjective meaning "very large." The meaning provide isn't really in common use at all, as far as I know.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)Which was a derogatory term used for people with Down's syndrome. In the context, I did not read it as 'very large the Kardashian', but as a reference to intelligence, and hence read it as the slur.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)way in the United States. It's really not.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)Speaking 4 languages, and working on the fifth, a bit of bleed-off is to be expected.
However, I believe I reacted appropriately, by asking instead of alerting. It is not over-sensitivity to be aware of words that are slurs, even if it is in comparable languages.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)heard or seen the word used that way. So, no, it's not in common use, as you suggested.
Orrex
(63,224 posts)When I read "Mongo" my first thought was "Ming the Merciless."
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)I looked it up. It is exactly as Kit describes. It means idiot, as derived from the term mongoloid. She knows our language better than we do.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)yesphan
(1,588 posts)of a great Tumbador.
http://www.allmusic.com/artist/mongo-santamaria-mn0000591104
zappaman
(20,606 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)I knew the other existed, but don't think I've ever heard or seen it used.
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)in this context.
At any rate, a jury found it to be offensive and over the top, and I for one agree with that decision.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)What does your creative writing skills say about my suggestion of Harriet Beecher Stowe ? She's white so am I just being racist now too ? -or- are you so target fixated on me that you missed it ?
I said it to put mock the ridiculousness of the American gluttony and desire for material wealth and fame. If I've insulted you by mocking the American dream family "Kardashian", then I just feel sorry for you.
just when I thought you couldn't miss the point any more you think it's about Obama and/or people with down syndrome ? Like I said, you are too sensitive, and WAY to anxious.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)As for your suggestion, I think Harriet Tubman or Sojourner Truth are better suggestions - they risked their lives to free slaves. Harriet Beecher Stowe played a huge role in the abolition movement, but I think that as part of a privileged class in the matter or race, if not in gender, she is not the first choice when it comes to honoring those who fought for abolition.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)President Obama wants to put women on dollar bills - the first real woman to be put on a dollar bill in the US - and your reaction was to suggest a fantasy female member of the Kardashian family? Way to start a serious discussion.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)That's the problem.
A-Schwarzenegger
(15,596 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)huge. Short for humongous. ◦See more words with the same meaning: abbreviations (list of).
◦See more words with the same meaning: big, large.
noun
an unintelligent person. From "Mongoloid idiot".
The insult is not to the Kardashians. It's to women and to the importance of honoring women of historical importance. Mongo is not a term I was familiar with so I looked it up. Both meanings are offensive.
As for Stowe, I think if one is to honor an abolitionist, I think a black abolitionist is a better choice.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)rather than the adjective. I don't think I reacted inappropriately either - asking whether it was an ableist slur and recommending an edit if it was. Of course, the response was an accusation of over-sensitivity, which is very par for the course.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)Anything that does not affirm absolute privilege is "over-sensitive."
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)with sarcastic "disclaimers" to ridicule those who believe that words and language actually matter, and has an effect on society. That slurs matter.
I once read a comparison of the use of slurs with Chinese water torture - each slur is but a small drop on the forehead, innocuous in itself, something so many of us experience should we happen to be outside when it starts to rain. But while the rest of us can go inside when it rains, minority groups are forced to experience drop after drop after drop after drop on their forehead, being unable to do anything about it except speak out against the use of slurs. So you can be darned sure I will speak out when I see slurs, because as an able-bodied white woman, I have privileges disabled people, and people of color do not have. I would rather use my privileges to make this world a better one for everyone in it, as a true progressive, rather than sneer, make fun, and ridicule.
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)I look forward to the time when people using these slurs will be made to feel at least as uncomfortable as the people confronting them on it.
Best wishes.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)By that logic, no "man" would be a worthy choice for showing leadership nor sacrifice in the fight against sexism.
read the rest of my posts, or not. Doubt you would understand what I said anyway.
take care.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)and those who experienced it, escaped bondage, and continued to fight for the freedom of others did more for that cause. They also know what it was like to live under bondage, hence Harriet Tubman or Sojourner Truth.
I know of many men who are allies against sexism and misogyny. I would not, however, elevate them above those who experience it to single out for honor.
I understand determination to uphold privilege very well. Should I forget, there are always many intent on reminding me.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The only time I've ever heard it used was the large brute of a man in the movie 'Blazing Saddles'. I've never heard anyone ever use it to refer to a person with Down's Syndrome.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)Never expected to be taken as a slur against Obama or those with down syndrome. But that's what keeps me here "you never know what you're gonna get"
***disclaimer***
That quote is pulled from a movie about an inspirational, fictitious movie character and in no way is meant as a slur against any and all human, plant nor any animal populations, that may have been inadvertently insulted or made to feel inferior as a result of my message board comment.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)(Edit, oh, Kardassian? Now that I see the titles of other comments, that might be the 'K' in question.)
obliviously
(1,635 posts)Is color something distasteful to you? 2014 and we are somehow aloof to color. Despicable!
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Would be funny as hell and just plain feel right to replace that racist genocidal asshole Andrew Jackson with a black woman.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)You make an excellent point, and Harriet Tubman would be an excellent replacement for Jackson. No question about it. Plus, right wing heads would explode colorfully, I'm sure.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Now that would really be poetic justice.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)What with his likeness on a piece of currency issued by a central bank.
He would have challenged someone to a duel over that.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)They could just move that image onto the $20. I thought it was lovely and very apt.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)First, I think 20s are used far more often, and second, I'll link to someone who tells it better than I can - http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/03/andrew_jackson_should_be_kicked_off_the_20_bill_he_ordered_a_genocide.html
(Edit, my link wasn't displaying, so I took it out of site format.)
The man was and is unworthy of being on our currency. Having him there is a stain on the country.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Someone else also suggested the $20 bill. Let's push for it.
There are other women who could be first, of course, but I think Harriet Tubman represents the very best of American history, and deserved that kind of recognition.
geardaddy
(24,931 posts)Jackson needs to go.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Still, there are many possibilities, and I'm glad the subject has been started. It's about time.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)niyad
(113,576 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)There are many good choices, I think.
One thing in Harriet Tubman's favor is that she is taught about in every grammar school. Kids know about her. That's a big plus, I think. Besides, I like her face in the image I posted.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)She deserves to be honored, and US dollar bills need some diversity on them.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)If I remember correctly from my last trip there, they have a woman on every single banknote denomination.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)the response among a certain group of men was to threaten her with rape, murder, doxxing, and all sorts of nastiness.
That they have Queen Elizabeth II on each note will change in due time, but the reverse has a whole lot of men, and very few women. Since 1970, out of the 12 portraits that have been on the reverse side of pound notes, only 2 have been women, Florence Nightingale on the £10-note from 1975-1994, and Elisabeth Fry on the £5-note from 2002, due to be replaced by Winston Churchill in 2016.
If President Obama goes ahead with his suggestion to replace some of the white old men on the dollar bills with women, and with women of color, even, I am sure the US will have its share of men go berserk. Luckily, the President has the Secret Service to help with the backlash.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)has a law against living persons appearing on currency and coins. A good anti-royalist rule.
"We can never spend royals."
(Say...that'd be a good song...)
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And wasn't Susan B. Anthony on an earlier version?
intheflow
(28,504 posts)Talk about women being freaking invisible - women are already on US currency!
Staph
(6,253 posts)Women are still freaking invisible, because the only currency that they've been featured on is virtually invisible!
Reter
(2,188 posts)However, with dollar value falling, it may be time to create a $250 bill.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I love dollar coins, and use them as often as possible. I refill every time I hit a bank in person.
intheflow
(28,504 posts)I work with the public and handle all kinds of currency all the time. There are a lot of those dollars floating around.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)though. Personally, I liked the Eisenhower dollar. The larger coin size made it easy to differentiate from the quarter, unlike the smaller coins.
It is past time, though, I think, for a woman to appear on paper currency.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I disliked the Susan B. Anthony dollar coin -- no offense to her, but it was just too similar to the quarter.
Inflation is very low right now, but, with time, the dollar will inexorably be worth what a quarter was worth when the Anthony dollar came out (1979). At some point it will probably make sense to phase out the $1 bill and use only the Sacagawea coin for that denomination.
Response to MineralMan (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
intheflow
(28,504 posts)It could be argued that Angelou was political, but she wasn't a political figure.
The only exception I can think of to the "political figure on US currency" rule, though, is Sacagawea. Though Lewis and Clark's expedition could be seen as political, and therefore, her service on that journey might be interpreted as political, as well.
Response to intheflow (Reply #28)
Name removed Message auto-removed
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)intheflow
(28,504 posts)I said her service to the US on the Lewis & Clark expedition might be interpreted as political. I did not say she was a politcal figure, but rather the exception to the political figure rule. Reading comprehension is a beautiful thing.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)We tend to go with tradition and long-dead people on currency. I doubt that will change.
wryter2000
(46,082 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)Not knocking your choice, but I'd be shocked if more than 15% of the population knows who she is.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)They've been teaching about Tubman for a long, long time now. I think you'd be surprised.
Reter
(2,188 posts)I'd be surprised if you get more than 3. Ask 10 HS kids. I'd be surprised if more than 1 know who she is. I'm not gonna lie. I didn't.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Eleanor Roosevelt would also be a good candidate.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)I'd bet more people know about Harriet Tubman than they do Hamilton.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)He founded the U.S. financial system and wrote a majority of the Feralist Papers, not to mentioned being killed in a dual with a VP Aaron Burr.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)A good number of people can't even name the current VP, let alone know who Hamilton was -- as important as he was.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)School children learn about Harriet Tubman.
kcr
(15,320 posts)You're the first person I've ever heard claim they never heard of her.
Courtesy Flush
(4,558 posts)before she was pictured on the dollar coin?
Harriet Tubman has always been taught in schools.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)but then I am in Central New York, Syracuse/Auburn area.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)You win the Internets.
Response to Fuddnik (Reply #35)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to 8_Point (Reply #53)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)and reveals a great deal about how people see women.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #54)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)She's a handsome woman, but I don't want her on our currency.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Emily Dickinson, maybe.
randys1
(16,286 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)sad for you" if you don't care for, say, John Donne? Or Chaucer in the original? Or Henry James? Or Lord Byron? Or....whomever?
I have a degree in the subject; I've taught the subject; I am more than knowledgeable enough to have legit opinions on the subject of poetry, TYVM.
such anger over my suggesting a wonderful, cherished Woman like Maya...wonder what that is about
Peregrine
(992 posts)Beginning of the environmental movement
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)More evidence that it's past time.
Staph
(6,253 posts)Clara Barton, who worked as a patent clerk and probably the first woman to hold a federal government job, served as a Civil War nurse who was put in charge of all hospitals for the Army of the James, set up a hospital for those who had been held at the infamous Andersonville Prison, ran the Office of Missing Soldiers after the war, and, oh yeah, started the American Red Cross after working with the International Red Cross while helping to set up hospitals during the Franco-Prussian War.
She's been on a postage stamp in 1948, so there's already a nice etched version of her face!
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Tribalceltic
(1,000 posts)Although the charity she founded is mired in corruption, Her work does stand out.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Probably not politically prominent enough for a currency choice, though.
Tribalceltic
(1,000 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)GMTA just means Great Minds Think Alike. It happens on DU more often than you'd think.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Although Harriet Tubman is a good one too.
kickitup
(355 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Sacagawea Dollar Coin:
Susan B. Anthony Dollar Coin:
The problem seems to be more with acceptance of a dollar coin than who is on it.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)Swipe of a card and you're through the line pretty fast. What would people want with another coin?
I was in Guatemala for two months and their "dollar" coins came in handy. But that's the thing there, you can't ever really get away with not handling cash or coins. Almost impossible actually, you had to be in a very fancy resturant to get away with that. Here? Even a free-standing jewelry/purse stall has a swipe plug-in for their iPhones.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Although the more frequent issue is that nearly everyone else has gone to smart cards, and they are positively puzzled by cards which don't have them, even those most POS terminals have a swipe slot on the side.
What's really weird these days is leaving the country with no more than a couple of dollars in cash and an ATM card in your pocket.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)You can't eat fame, nor feed it to your children, nor pay the IRS or the student loans...
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)...
Helen Keller on the reverse of the Alabama quarter: 2003
Sacagawea on the dollar coin: 1999-Present
Susan B. Anthony on the dollar coin: 1979-1981
Uh, yeah, three isn't very many. Took until 1979 to get the first one (though Anthony's postage stamps appear in 1936 and 1955). First woman on a stamp was Queen Isabella in 1893; took another 9 years before Martha Washington.
Yup, time to get some ladies on some folding. I'd like to suggest my wife for the $1,000,000.00 bill.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Emily Dickinson is another great American woman.
Jane Addams has been one of my heroes since I was a child.
Jane Addams (September 6, 1860 May 21, 1935) was a pioneer settlement social worker, public philosopher, sociologist, author, and leader in women's suffrage and world peace. In an era when presidents such as Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson identified themselves as reformers and social activists, Addams was one of the most prominent[1] reformers of the Progressive Era. She helped turn the US to issues of concern to mothers, such as the needs of children, public health, and world peace. She said that if women were to be responsible for cleaning up their communities and making them better places to live, they needed the vote to be effective in doing so. Addams became a role model for middle-class women who volunteered to uplift their communities. She is increasingly being recognized as a member of the American pragmatist school of philosophy.[2] In 1931 she became the first American woman to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and is recognized as the founder of the social work profession in the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Addams
She nominated Theodore Roosevelt to be the candidate of the Progressive Party. One amazing woman.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)There are many women I'd like to see on our currency. Maybe we should use them all, and issue currency with different faces on it for different printings. I don't know.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Late 1800's feminist badass.
"When America passed the fugitive slave law compelling men to catch their fellows more brutally than runaway dogs, Canada, aristocratic, unrepublican Canada, still stretched her arms to those who might reach her. But there is no refuge upon earth for the enslaved sex. Right where we are, there we must dig our trenches, and win or die!"
"Who thinks a dog is impure or obscene because its body is not covered with suffocating and annoying clothes? What would you think of the meanness of a man who would put a skirt upon his, horse and compel it to walk or run with such a thing impeding its limbs? Why, the "Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals" would arrest him, take the beast from him, and he would be sent to a lunatic asylum for treatment on the score of an impure mind. And yet, gentlemen, you expect your wives, the creatures you say you respect and love, to wear the longest skirts and the highest necked clothing, in order to conceal the obscene human body. There is no society for the prevention of cruelty to women."
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)anyone who's going on US currency is going to have to be a well-recognized name, I'm afraid.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)already on coins. This country has an immense and diverse history of people, would be good to see more of the uncommon, yet impactful historical figures.
But you are right, Voltairine wouldn't really be a good choice for say, the 20$ bill.
kickitup
(355 posts)savalez
(3,517 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)warrant the honor of being on US currency. Now had she been a principle force in the underground railroad system and had she fought for the end of slavery, I might reconsider. But...
savalez
(3,517 posts)Point taken. She's still one of my heros.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)savalez
(3,517 posts)I'm down with that.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Hands down winner. I'd even give her the fifty.
But the ten is more frequently used, so this will keep her in the mind of the public.
On the obverse, A border of broken chains with 1: A confederate flag thrown down. 2: A wide landscape of the crowd at the Lincoln Memorial for the "I have a Dream" speech.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)pissing on the confederate flag.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)Sojourner Truth. Those are my choices.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)Thanks for this thread.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Martha Washington was on $1.00 silver certificates (paper currency from the government) in the late 1800s.
Both Sacagawea and Susan B Anthony have each been on the $1 coin.
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)to the White House?
It's always worth a try.
In any case, thanks for an excellent OP.
think
(11,641 posts)It's 10:27 pm est now. guess we'll see who he picks.
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)I promise you more people are concerned about the denominations they have on hand than who's picture is on it.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)You can start a new thread to discuss the one you want to discuss, if you choose.
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)that can turn into a political anchor around the neck on a dime if it is perceived to be a diversion of focus from the primary.
You really want to hear "Democrats care more about who has a picture on your money than how much money you have in your pocket" over and over?
It is an odd point of focus when folks are struggling and have been struggling for years with a "recovery" that cannot match the aftermath of the first Bush Recession. Remember the "salad days" of running against the Bush economy and all the hardship caused, well that world of shit is halfway an unobtainable dream now and we are supposed to be focused on who appears on bills that we can barely put enough of together to make it?
Good idea but approaching an absurd and tone deaf point of focus circumstantially.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)so would
Eleanor Roosevelt and Sybil Ludington