General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSpied On Committee's CIA Torture Report Won’t Call Interrogations Torture – But It Will Show Horrors
Eli Lake ?@EliLake 13mFrom @joshrogin and me on forthcoming coming report from Senate Democrats on Bush era CIA black sites http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/31/cia-torture-report-won-t-call-interrogations-torture-but-it-will-show-horrors.html
A long-awaited Senate report wont use the word torture to describe the CIAs interrogations. But it will show abuse that is horrific, systematic, and widespread.
The White House is set to give Congress on Friday the final, declassified version of the Senate Intelligence Committees majority report on CIA interrogation. And according to one person who has reviewed the document and three people who were briefed on its contents, the committees report will reveal new and shocking details about the CIAs detention, rendition, and interrogation program in the years following the 9/11 attacks. But the report will not accuse the CIA outright of torture, an accusation that could have political, diplomatic, legal, and even criminal implications.
Instead, committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein has said, the report shows abuse that is chilling and far more systematic and widespread than we thought.
The redacted, 600-page executive summary of the 6,300-page report is expected to reveal that CIA interrogators abroad misled or failed to properly inform officials, lawmakers, and even the Secretary of State about the use of harsh interrogation techniques against prisoners in CIA prisons around the world. Moreover, the document is expected to say that the use of those techniques was not effective in collecting unique intelligence or thwarting plots.
The release will also include a formal rebuttal from the CIA, which has been in public feud with the committee over the agencys hacking of computers the investigators were using to help research this report. The document will also include a minority dissent from Republicans on the committee, who withdrew from the investigation in protest in the early stages of the process . . .
read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/31/cia-torture-report-won-t-call-interrogations-torture-but-it-will-show-horrors.html
related:
Let's talk a little more about why the CIA was 'spying' on the Senate Intelligence Committee
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Think maybe you should be re-evaluating your see-no-evil position when it comes to the intelligence agencies under your purview? Or, will you be "outraged" for a couple of days and be right back in their pocket when you come back from recess?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025317613
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)going rogue and breaking it in the first place.
Lesser of two evils my ass on this stuff, covering, continuing, and codifying is not some improvement or corrupt lawlessness, it is even more corrupt with a slick smile and some bullshit talk meant to pacify.
Probably the same evil masquerading as greater and lesser but more like two hands working in concert each doing its part in turn but careful to avoid straining the suspension of disbelief too far so one starts and the other finishes but always the same destination.