General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama Admin Readies Response to Upcoming Torture Report - Says 'Americans Can Take Pride' in End
from MintPress News:
A State Department document obtained by the Associated Press reveals part of the Obama administrations attempt to ready its public relations response to an upcoming Senate report on the CIAs torture program.
Due to be declassified in the coming days, the report is said to criticize the agency for its post-9/11 illegal torture of detainees in secret prisons. The document details some of the administrations prepared talking points to be used once a White House-approved version of the report is released.
Reportedly sent by accident via email to the AP, the State Department memo describes the report as a demonstration of American democracy, rather than as an indictment of the CIAs torture practices. The document states that no American is proud of the CIAs tactics, but that the story of illegal, indefinite torture and imprisonment is part of a larger message, one in which Americas democratic system worked just as it was designed to work in bringing an end to actions inconsistent with our democratic values. That story, the document proclaims, is one in which Americans can take pride.
. . . The Senate report is also said to confirm what the public has long known about the RDI program that in addition to torturing detainees, the agency lied to Congress about the programs efficacy, claiming it was essential to gather information about al-Qaeda. The document states that the report leaves no doubt that the methods used to extract information from some terrorist suspects caused profound pain, suffering and humiliation. It also leaves no doubt that the harm caused by the use of these techniques outweighed any potential benefit.
The document also writes up questions from the press and members of Congress that are likely to be asked after the report is released:
Isnt it clear that the CIA engaged in torture as defined in the Torture Convention?Doesnt the report make clear that at least some who authorized or participated in the RDI program committed crimes?
Now that the report is released is the White House prepared to concede that people were tortured or will these be like the non-coup in Egypt where you wont admit the obvious?
Will the Justice Department revisit its decision not to prosecute anyone?
What are you still trying to hide?
read more: http://www.mintpressnews.com/state-dept-torture-talking-points-reveal-white-house-pr-machine-ahead-of-senate-report/194799/
related:
Let's talk a little more about why the CIA was 'spying' on the Senate Intelligence Committee
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025320097
[link:http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=4444|
Sen. Udall(D)- CIA IG Report Raises Grave Concerns About Constitutional Separation of Powers]
Spied On Committee's CIA Torture Report Wont Call Interrogations Torture But It Will Show Horrors
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Are they arresting everyone who committed these crimes, or ordered them committed?
Unless that's the case, I see very little of which to even potentially be 'proud'.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts). . . in both renditions and approving or looking the other way in tortures overseas in our behalf.
Of course, they won't, but I'm still hoping we can force them to.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)And are pursuing many of the same policies as BushCo did.
Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Lord Acton
elias49
(4,259 posts)what timing! Wink.wink.
Joe six-pack won't give 2 shits about CIA rendition.
conservaphobe
(1,284 posts)The American public does not like those kinds of games in politics.
I don't take anyone seriously who thinks we should make people with which we disagree political prisoners.
bigtree
(85,998 posts). . .those practices were actually illegal when they were used and the interrogators knew that.
It's curious that you think prosecuting them would be 'game playing' and not the Yoo memos which gave them cover.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Your logic stinks as far as I can tell. What is the purpose then of codification of law? What is the purpose of the law if it is not applied to the powerful and the powerless alike?
What the fuck is the purpose of signing treaties and conventions that do not apply to the only people in a position on to violate them?
How dare we execute and call for the execution of others for crimes that when we commit the very same crimes it is labeled a "political disagreement"?
There is no political disagreement, torture is a crime against humanity and it doesn't matter an iota if you don't believe prosecution will be popular.
deminks
(11,014 posts)When was the effing system invoked???????
When Buchco, et al, is behind bars with the key thrown away, then I will be proud. Until then, crime pays, and pays well. We are a banana republic.
Don't tell me it's raining when you are standing there micturating on my head.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)Takes a warped person to spin it that way. Sick fucks think that way.