Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,033 posts)
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 12:54 PM Aug 2014

Why are NYT/Wapo etc paywalled while TPM/Rawstory etc free?

Anyone noticed that traditional news sources like NY Times, Washington Post, heck even your local news sites get paywalled after a certain # of articles? Yet there are Internet news sources whether on the left like Think Progress/TPM/Raw Story or on the right like Breitbart/The Blaze/Daily Caller that are free to read. I think the reason why the public is so misinformed is that the primary news providers (as opposed to the sites like Think progress that re-report and provide commentary on the primary sources) can't keep up with the times.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are NYT/Wapo etc paywalled while TPM/Rawstory etc free? (Original Post) alp227 Aug 2014 OP
Because original reporting costs money, stolen content and sideboob are free. nt LeftyMom Aug 2014 #1
Think Progress and Raw Story steal content? alp227 Aug 2014 #4
Raw Story, yes. Think Progress would improve quality if they did. mathematic Aug 2014 #6
Different business models. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #2
True. It used to be that print subscribers subsidized the websites enough alp227 Aug 2014 #3
I got a PasadenaTrudy Aug 2014 #5

alp227

(32,033 posts)
4. Think Progress and Raw Story steal content?
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 02:10 PM
Aug 2014

Think Progress I know is a nonprofit backed by the Center for American Progress, hence why they are free access. Ditto with NPR or other nonprofit media. Maybe it's time that news orgs should be nonprofits instead of commercial enterprises.

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
6. Raw Story, yes. Think Progress would improve quality if they did.
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 02:27 PM
Aug 2014

I don't mean literally steal, though. Just a sleazy repackaging.

Raw Story will write an extremely sensationalist, out-of-context, misquoting headline and opening paragraph and then get on with the story everybody would have been better served reading straight from the AP.

Think Progress isn't a news source. It's a talking points distribution platform. Yes, I realize that's what Think Progress readers say about mainstream sources. That's one of the talking points.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. Different business models.
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 12:57 PM
Aug 2014

News providers that evolved from old school print media generally still want you to actually pay them to give you their product.

alp227

(32,033 posts)
3. True. It used to be that print subscribers subsidized the websites enough
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 01:09 PM
Aug 2014

for websites to be free. But in any time, the news services get the money where the readers are, and in modern times it's mostly digital.

PasadenaTrudy

(3,998 posts)
5. I got a
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 02:17 PM
Aug 2014

digital subscription to the NYT. It does get frustrating trying to read my local LA Times and Pasadena Star News. I can't subscribe to all of them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are NYT/Wapo etc payw...