General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWikiLeaks Cables Reveal U.S. Gov't Planned To “Retaliate and Cause Pain” On Countries Refusing GMOs
Arjun Walia July 31, 2014
Studies that link Genetically Modified (GM) food to multiple human health ailments are not the only thing that has millions of people questioning the production of GM food. The fact that previously classified secret government documents show how the Bush administration developed ways to retaliate against countries that were refusing to use GM seeds is another.
If documents regarding our food are required to be concealed from the public domain, something is not right, and its great to have an organization like WikiLeaks shed some light into the world thats been hidden from us for so many years.
Targeting Certain Countries
The cables reveal that the State Department was lobbying all over the world for Monsanto, and other major biotech corporations. They reveal that American diplomats requested funding to send lobbyists for the biotech industry to meet with politicians and agricultural officials in target countries. These included countries in Africa, Latin America and some European countries.
A non-profit consumer protection group called Food & Water Watch published a report showing the details of the partnership between the federal government and a number of biotech companies who have pushed their GMO products on multiple countries for a number of years.The United States has aggressively pursued foreign policies in food and agriculture that benefit the largest seed companies. The U.S. State department has launched a concerted strategy to promote agricultural biotechnology, often over the opposition of the public and government, to the near exclusion of other more sustainable, more appropriate agricultural policy alternatives. The U.S. State department has also lobbied foreign governments to adopt pro-agricultural biotechnology politics and laws, operated a rigorous public resoulations campaign to improve the image of biotechnology and challenged common sense biotechnology safeguards and rules even including opposing laws requiring the labeling of genetically engineered (GE) foods. (source)
HERE is one cable (out of many) from Morocco.
Full Article: http://www.naturalblaze.com/2014/07/wikileaks-cables-reveal-us-govt-planned.html
Trillo
(9,154 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)They are just a thuggish, criminal gang fronting for corporations. That's their main priority. Let's take it back...For And By The People. These corporatists should be on trial.
conservaphobe
(1,284 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...since the issue at hand is not science, but government bullying tactics on behalf of large multinational corporations.
Amazing the things that will cause certain people to clap and cheer these days.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)Should be embarrassing. But there's no limit anymore.
"Do the Limbo- How Low can You Go"
Rex
(65,616 posts)One can only guess at to why.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)Look, low-info person, most folks are not opposed to *all* GMO, but to the blind, undifferentiated acceptance of the GMOs that put pesticides into our food supply via modifying plants to accept pesticides.
See: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017202953
Down thread, blkmusclmachine calls this administration's position "Corporate fascism" and it is!
Please read more and take your blinders off.
(And, btw, in order to fend against any personal attack, you should know that I am not some neo-Luddite - there are 2 phd scientists in my immediate family.)
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Something to bulk up the roots of plants with above-ground fruits, grains and vegetables with water storing nodules to enable them to withstand droughts and dry spells better.
What's not useful GM? GM that enables farmers to essentially sterilize enormous tracts of land except for their herbicide-resistant GM crops.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Or how about creating machinery that can harvest crops that are not monocrops which leads to widespread disease and insect attack?
How about water-efficient planting that produces the most food without poisoning the medium or the water?
How about not making super-weeds and super-bugs?
How about worrying about human and animal health before mega corporation profits?
That is science I support. Anyone who acts like those who resist GMOs are Luddites are outright lying.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)That is VERY conservative. There might be another name for it too....
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)But it goes further than that...
it means our government is against us having a healthy world, healthy food.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)"Citizens United?"
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)to lobby on behalf of its citizens...in other words, we don't have a voice, they don't work for us.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Really have been in the process since Ike warned us about the MIC. People are now just human capital.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Next will we find that the great scientific consensus is more of a carefully framed, highly controlled, exclusionary, and limited by controlling industry political stunt? Maybe.
The tactics of advocates are not encouraging and the outright arrogance and disdain many display is surely off putting.
I smell another in a long, long series of hand wringing and "who could have ever guessed" already in the pipeline.
Maybe it is all fine but bullying rather than education doesn't support that. Most likely some methods and combinations are fine and other less so while still others are an actual improvement and ever modification should be evaluated individually and tested freely which means the health of the people and the food supply takes precedence over patent security and when completed and found safe then the consumer still has the right to know, it is their money and their body.
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)I mean other than the obvious, that Monsanto bought the whole government lock, stock, and barrel. But they are one company. There are lots of interests competing with Monsanto/GMO. Why does the gov't want to push this? This makes no sense to me.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The reason is always money, as Michael Douglas said in Haywire (chance to plug a fun movie).
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)It should be expanding funding to public university biosciences, not welding itself to corporate concerns.
arikara
(5,562 posts)and they should be funding universities to test these things properly and honestly. Which neither corporation or government does at this time. And the universities go to the highest bidder... well I guess the politicians do too.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Sadly, it doesn't.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)GMO and more broadly the system of food production and delivery of which it is a part are a matter of power, money, politics and control: economics.
Parallel thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025321673
Duppers
(28,125 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)to force products on other nations, particularly questionable ones?
TIMETOCHANGE
(86 posts)The 1% needs to sell their seeds. They call their whores in government to make it happen. Commerce at the end of a gun barrel.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I thought I'd heard it all...but missed that one. OMG...
Thanks for the info. I know he was going to "revisit NAFT" and "Transparency in Government" and so many other things. I didn't catch the one about the GMO's.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)had ideas and products that were good enough to sell themselves, no arm twisting or threats required.
PatSeg
(47,501 posts)that was referenced in the Wikileaks Cables is available on YouTube.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)it was a good reminder of how disgusting monsanto really is
PatSeg
(47,501 posts)after encountering some pro-GMO people on another thread. Basically if you're anti-GMOs, you're anti science---very aggressive and rude. Not exactly what I was expecting at DU.
Ohio Joe
(21,756 posts)What does the cable say the US should do? Lets take a look...
"¶6. Action requested: While Country Team is not inclined to directly rebut the film thereby giving it credence, we believe there is a role for public diplomacy, mainly focusing on the rigor of the U.S. regulatory system and the positive role ag biotech can play in meeting world food needs, particularly in the developing world. At the same time, it would be useful for Emboffs to have talking points."
Wow... Such retaliation...
It really bothers me when not only is science ignored but then out right lies are spread to try and back them up. None of this has anything to do with forcing anyone to use GMO's, it has to do with backing up the US regulatory system.
Pure Grade-A Bullshit.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)As usual.
indepat
(20,899 posts)heaped on you.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)It's like Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.