Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,003 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 09:05 PM Aug 2014

Billions for domination, not one cent for decency.

TUE AUG 05, 2014 AT 05:57 PM PDT
Billions for domination, not one cent for decency.
byarendt


No fact is of any value except insofar as it is useful to someone's agenda.



We will spend hundreds of millions without hesitation to send weapons to Israel, military advisers to the Ukraine, non-lethal aid to the completely compromised Syrian resistance (a creature of the Saudis from day one). We will waste close to half a trillion dollars on the F-35 - a turkey that only seems to win in the cost-overrun and failure categories. We will hand out surplus military vehicles and communications intelligence equipment like party favors to our increasingly militarized internal security forces. We spy on everyone; vacuum up every phone call. Supposedly we do this in the name of "security", but it is really in the name of domination.

OTOH, we let Katrina drown; and we will let Detroit rot. We will let our infrastructure crumble. We will let veterans starve and beg for medical care. We will deny Obamacare to half the country out of pure spite. We will cut already threadbare SNAP programs. This civic neglect is malign. It is designed to induce compliance to the corporate agenda.

We have been immersed in an anti-democracy propaganda bubble for over a generation now. It's gotten to the point where people do not even understand that you cannot have a democracy when every interaction between citizen and increasingly-fused government/corporations is reduced to domination by the powerful and compliance by the powerless. You cannot have a democracy or honest diplomacy when no divergence from the "party line" is allowed, when those who diverge are verbally savaged as traitors, subversives, and perverts (or when those epithets are laughably counter-factual, as wimps, bleeding hearts, purists, sanctimonious people, hippies, socialists, etc.).

..........


and yes there is MORE:
http://www.dailykos.com/blog/classwarfarenewsletter

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Billions for domination, not one cent for decency. (Original Post) kpete Aug 2014 OP
just waiting MFM008 Aug 2014 #1
Started already.......... Amonester Aug 2014 #6
Great graphic! emsimon33 Aug 2014 #8
Yes. Two other craters blew up last week near that one. Amonester Aug 2014 #9
You cannot have a democracy or honest diplomacy when no divergence from the "party line" is allowed, noiretextatique Aug 2014 #2
hi rodriguez53190 Aug 2014 #3
, blkmusclmachine Aug 2014 #4
And it keeps getting worse because we don't learn our lessons very well. DeSwiss Aug 2014 #5
K&R emsimon33 Aug 2014 #7
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2014 #10
K&R! This post deserves hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Aug 2014 #11

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
9. Yes. Two other craters blew up last week near that one.
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 02:43 AM
Aug 2014

It's over. Nothing will get done in time to prevent it.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
2. You cannot have a democracy or honest diplomacy when no divergence from the "party line" is allowed,
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 09:54 PM
Aug 2014

afngmen!

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
5. And it keeps getting worse because we don't learn our lessons very well.
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 12:02 AM
Aug 2014
- There is nothing new under the sun......

K&R

on....''The Law of Civilization and Decay'' by Brook Adams

Adams’ chosen time-span begins and ends with the same arc of the cycle: the collapse of the Roman Empire and the threatened collapse of Western Civilization. Without subscribing to the inevitability structure inherent in cyclical theories of history, one nevertheless reads Adams’ description of societal fragmentation in Rome with a certain feeling of déjá-vu: the accelerating centralisation of money and agriculture; the dependence of status on wealth; the impoverishment of the small farmer; and especially the migration of the poor to the big cities. If you substitute the growth of automation for the influx of foreign slaves, the points of similarity with modern America are particularly striking. Both slaves and machines provide a cheap, depersonalized energy source, whose productivity enriches the entrepreneur rather than the worker who has been displaced. Adams had no illusions about the relationship between law and justice:
    ''. . . as {the usurer} fed on insolvency and controlled legislation, the laws were as ingeniously contrived for creating debt, as for making it profitable when contracted. . . As the capitalists owned the courts and administered justice, they had the means at hand of ruining any plebeian whose property was tempting.''

    Nor was Adams’ perception of the nature of law confined to ancient Rome. He was able to see, clearer than his contemporaries, that it is no mere coincidence, nor a lex naturae, that the modern legal system is concerned mostly with the protection of property rights:

      ''Abstract justice is, of course, impossible. Law is merely the expression of the will of the strongest for the time being, and therefore laws have no fixity, but shift from generation to generation. As competition sharpens . . . religious ritual is supplanted by civil codes for the enforcement of contracts and the protection of the creditor class. The more society consolidates, the more legislation is controlled by the wealthy, and at length the representatives of the moneyed class acquire that absolute power once wielded by the Roman proconsul, and now exercised by the modern magistrate.''

    Thus the modern legal system is infinitely subtle, and its enforcing officers equally efficient, in punishing those forms of theft which are not practiced by the ruling class; but robbery in the market-place is governed by primitive controls which lag far behind the sophisticated mechanisms which company lawyers contrive to circumvent them. One measure of a society is the problems it chooses to solve.

    ''Rome’s ruling class was unable to restrain its rapacity, even in its own ultimate interest. Adams saw what liberals are rarely willing to admit—namely, that a system based on corrupt practice cannot be saved merely by tinkering with it.''

    'The Economics of Human Energy' in Brooks Adams, Ezra Pound, and Robert Theobald - by John Whiting, London University
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Billions for domination, ...