Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSen. Udall: "CIA should not face its past with a redaction pen, and the WH must not allow it"
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
Mark Udall, who serves on the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, welcomed Chairman Dianne Feinstein's decision today to push the White House to ensure the fullest possible declassification of the committee's ground-breaking study of the CIA's detention and interrogation program.
"I share Chairman Feinstein's concerns about the excessive redactions proposed by the White House to the executive summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee's study on the CIA's detention and interrogation program, especially given the president's unequivocal commitment to declassifying the Senate Intelligence Committee's study. I promised earlier this year to hold the president to his word and I intend to do so," Udall said.
"The president's acknowledgment last week that the CIA tortured detainees in the course of this program underscores the importance of making the committee's study accessible to the public and highlights the importance of taking the time the committee needs to negotiate redaction changes with the White House. While Director Clapper may be technically correct that the document has been 85 percent declassified, it is also true that strategically placed redactions can make a narrative incomprehensible and can certainly make it more difficult to understand the basis for the findings and conclusions reached in the report. I agree wholeheartedly that redactions are necessary to protect intelligence sources and methods, but the White House must work closely with this committee to reach this goal in a way that makes it possible for the public to understand what happened.
"I am committed to working with Chairman Feinstein to declassify the Senate Intelligence Committee's study to the fullest extent possible, correct the record on the CIA's brutal and ineffective detention and interrogation program, and ensure the CIA learns from its past mistakes. And in light of the importance of the work the Senate Intelligence Committee has undertaken, I believe that the chairman should take all necessary time to ensure that the redactions to the executive summary are appropriate not merely made to cover up acts that could embarrass the agency.
"The CIA should not face its past with a redaction pen, and the White House must not allow it to do so."
read: http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=4453
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 967 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Udall: "CIA should not face its past with a redaction pen, and the WH must not allow it" (Original Post)
bigtree
Aug 2014
OP
It's Republican plot to disparage the prez! Oh, wait...they're Democrats.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2014
#4
grasswire
(50,130 posts)1. excellent nt
Uncle Joe
(58,378 posts)2. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, bigtree.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)4. It's Republican plot to disparage the prez! Oh, wait...they're Democrats.
Good work, Big Tree. We're supposed to hold our public servants accountable. All of them.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)5. Agreed
Thanks to bigtree for all the information on this subject.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)6. No Brainer
We don't want to be ruled by spies.