Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 04:47 AM Aug 2014

Robert Parry: Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts


Still, there's the issue of motivation. It's the rebels, after all, who are being bombed.

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/25147-focus-flight-17-shoot-down-scenario-shifts

Despite U.S. spy satellites positioned over eastern Ukraine, U.S. intelligence agencies have released no images of a Buk system being transferred by Russians to rebel control, shipped into Ukraine, deployed into firing position and then being taken back to Russia. Though the Obama administration has released other images of Ukraine taken by U.S. spy satellites, the absence of any photos of a rebel-controlled Buk missile battery has been the dog not barking in the strident case that Official Washington has made in blaming the rebels and Russia for the July 17 shoot-down that killed 298 people.

Given the size of these missile batteries – containing four 16-foot-long missiles – the absence of this evidence prompted caution among U.S. intelligence analysts even as senior U.S. officials and the U.S. mainstream media rushed to judgment blaming the rebels and Russians.

In making that case, Kerry and other senior officials relied on claims made by the Ukrainian government along with items posted on “social media.” These snippets of “evidence” included ambiguous remarks attributed to rebels who may have initially thought the shoot-down was another of their successful attacks on lower-flying Ukrainian military aircraft but who later insisted that they had not fired on the Malaysian plane and lacked the longer-range Buk missiles needed to reach above 30,000 feet.

If the U.S. intelligence analysts are correct – that the rebels and Russia are likely not responsible – the chief remaining suspect would be the Ukrainian government, which does possess Buk anti-aircraft missiles and reportedly had two fighter jets in the vicinity of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 at the time of the shoot-down.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Parry: Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts (Original Post) eridani Aug 2014 OP
Is absence of evidence evidence of absence? HereSince1628 Aug 2014 #1
Yes, IF you are claiming you have it. IF they are telling the truth, then where is sabrina 1 Aug 2014 #5
So Ukrainian fighters mistakenly shot down MH17 in broad daylight? KeepItReal Aug 2014 #2
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh malaise Aug 2014 #3
Good read.... KoKo Aug 2014 #4
It's like deju vu regarding the build up to Iraq, and definitely has a sabrina 1 Aug 2014 #6
:facepalm: jeff47 Aug 2014 #7
Parry. LOL...nt SidDithers Aug 2014 #8

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
1. Is absence of evidence evidence of absence?
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 07:51 AM
Aug 2014

This opinion piece seems to be situated well within the arena of Rummyspeak and Cheneythink.

And as this is about the shadowy world of leaked intelligence opinion and limited physical evidence there is quite a lot of room for speculative maneuver.

Can you imagine Ukraine risking what would surely be high levels of retaliation for shooting down a plane with Putin on it? I find the suggestion of national-suicide well beyond the question of motivation.

I can't even muster imagination for Ukraine risking world opinion for shooting down a commercial jet flying in closed airspace.







sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
5. Yes, IF you are claiming you have it. IF they are telling the truth, then where is
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 10:04 AM
Aug 2014

the evidence? What I saw as supposed 'photos' reminded me of Colin Powell's trailors which he claimed were proof of Saddam's WMDs. As it turned out those of us who found those 'blurry', they're always 'blurry', images laughable, turned out to be right.

So, since the US is making the claims, it is incumbent on THEM to provide the evidence, no?

Robert Parry is one of our best investigative journalists btw.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
2. So Ukrainian fighters mistakenly shot down MH17 in broad daylight?
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:03 AM
Aug 2014

Or a traitorous Ukrainian Surface-to-Air Missile operator fired on the the plane?

Which is it?

Who has been shooting down the Ukrainian ground attack fighters and transport aircraft, then?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. Good read....
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 09:50 AM
Aug 2014

Last edited Wed Aug 6, 2014, 11:28 AM - Edit history (1)

Rush to judgement that Kerry and Obama made seems to point to them being pushed to blame Russia.

Given the Business News which has Putin ready to march into Ukraine and hoopla from American Enterprise Institute and other interested Think Tanks outraged that we don't have enough sanctions on Russia and that we must get Nato involved in Ukraine to stop Putin...I'd say the rush to judgement was Wall Street and Neocons who want to make sure that Obama/Kerry don't stray off the script they've been given by those special interests.

Reminds me of the build up to Iraq Invasion and forces into Syria we just went through when the MSM Usual Sources start hyping Putin as an "Evil Power Hungry Wanna Be Dictator" who is dead set on rebuilding the former Soviet Union and must be stopped immediately. Same script all the time and hopefully people will wake up and see it for what it is.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
6. It's like deju vu regarding the build up to Iraq, and definitely has a
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 10:07 AM
Aug 2014

neocon flair to it. Looking at the disastrous results of the rest of their so-called wars, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Libya, ANYONE who pushes for this latest 'war', deserves to be locked up with the war criminals if we ever return to the Rule of Law in this country.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
7. :facepalm:
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 11:39 AM
Aug 2014

SAMs don't have infinite range.

The plane was over rebel territory. It was out of SAM range from Ukrainian territory.

So either the rebels shot the plane down, or the Ukranians managed a large-scale invasion into rebel territory in order to set up a SAM launcher, shoot down a plane, and then retreat from rebel territory. All without the rebels saying a peep. Or any civilians saying a peep as the heavy equipment drives on by.

After the shot down, the rebels tried to block access to the site. If the Ukrainian government shot the plane down, why on Earth would they do that? The rebels would be giving guided tours to all comers in order to hurt the Ukrainian government.

Forget the bullshit about intelligence and satellite photos. Look at things that are beyond question: the location of the shoot-down, and the public actions of the two groups after the shoot-down.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Parry: Flight 17 S...