Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 04:11 PM Aug 2014

No, New York Post, Feminism Is Not Imploding

By Amanda Marcotte

Naomi Schaefer Riley of the New York Post is excited, because she believes that feminism is finally, finally on its last legs. Her piece arguing this, titled “Scenes From the Feminist Implosion,” starts from a strange premise. Riley references a recent New Yorker article by Michelle Goldberg, in which Goldberg chronicles an academic debate between transgender people and a small cadre of self-described “radical feminists” who oppose transgenderism. Riley uses this academic debate to argue that “modern feminism is in crisis” and about to collapse. But there's no real reason to think that Goldberg's story, which chronicles a fight that is basically unknown to the larger public, has any impact at all on what most people think about when they think “feminism.”

Riley writes that you need “look no further” than Goldberg’s piece to see that this obscure battle between two academic feminist factions suggests an impending feminist implosion. Readers who actually bothered to read Goldberg’s piece, however, would get a very different impression. “The dispute began more than forty years ago, at the height of the second-wave feminist movement,” Goldberg writes. If the fight between transgender activists and radical feminists was going to destroy feminism, surely it would have done so long ago. If anything, this debate has only become more marginalized and academic since the '70s. Even Riley admits “the RadFem women are apparently in the minority” and that the transgender activists are winning.

Riley writes that you need “look no further” than Goldberg’s piece to see that this obscure battle between two academic feminist factions suggests an impending feminist implosion. Readers who actually bothered to read Goldberg’s piece, however, would get a very different impression. “The dispute began more than forty years ago, at the height of the second-wave feminist movement,” Goldberg writes. If the fight between transgender activists and radical feminists was going to destroy feminism, surely it would have done so long ago. If anything, this debate has only become more marginalized and academic since the '70s. Even Riley admits “the RadFem women are apparently in the minority” and that the transgender activists are winning. Advertisement

more
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/08/06/the_new_york_post_says_feminism_is_imploding_is_wrong.html?
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. I dont know why any feminist would have problems with Transgender follks
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 04:17 PM
Aug 2014

but maybe a few do based on their belief, so be it.

I think they are in the minority of feminists both male and female...


I tend not to judge people who's shoes I could never even pretend to have walked in.

underpants

(182,850 posts)
3. Getting the truth in the New York Post has been as difficult as finding a good hamburger in Albania
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 04:34 PM
Aug 2014

-Paul Newman

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
4. They were bashing trans women
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 04:43 PM
Aug 2014

Sorry, you can't possibly claim to be supportive of women and then backstab the most discriminated against women, trans women.

Trans people already have it bad enough without being shit on by gender equality activists.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No, New York Post, Femini...