General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTwitter Suspends Anonymous's Account for Posting Photo of a Ferguson Police Officer
Twitter suspended an account affiliated with the Internet group Anonymous on Thursday after the group posted a photo claiming to reveal the identity of the police officer who killed unarmed teenager Michael Brown over the weekend in Ferguson, Mo.
St. Louis County Police Department denied that the photo belongs to the officer who shot Brown. The department has thus far refused to publicly disclose the identity of the officer who fired at Brown, citing concern for his safety.
Twitter declined to comment on the matter, noting its general policy to not discuss individual accounts "for privacy and security reasons."
But a spokesman did point to the site's published rules, which state:"You may not publish or post other people's private and confidential information, such as credit card numbers, street address or Social Security/National Identity numbers, without their express authorization and permission."
http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/twitter-suspends-anonymous-account-for-posting-a-photo-of-ferguson-police-officer-20140814
https://twitter.com/account/suspended
https://twitter.com/feministabulous/status/499973149686259712/photo/1
ancianita
(36,161 posts)name on, too?
Also, the name's been posted on Facebook.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The horse has left the barn on that policeman. Once the name was out, it was easy to find out a great deal about him.
ancianita
(36,161 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)Every single one should have been shut down.
Oh look, the alleged rapist's account is still active
twitter.com/WhiteboyLaflare
You know all his buddies who also tweeted her pic still have their accounts too.
Rape culture doesn't exist though.
procon
(15,805 posts)Twitter is wrong. These are not ordinary "private" citizens like you or me. A police badge and ID includes a name and photo. It s a legal public record which is supposed to be produced on demand to prove their legitimate authority.
I suspect someone in power called Twitter and asked for a favor.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's a service that you sign up for and you agree with their tos to use it, much like DU. If they don't like you, they can dump you--it's not like a you have a "right" to a twitter account--they have the right to refuse service to anyone they'd like.
Twitter's lawyers probably looked at the context of the situation and decided that they didn't want to be an unwitting accessory to murder, so they took down the pic and closed the account to limit their liability. I don't think they were reacting to "higher authority," I think they were reacting to their bottom line. By doing that, they shield themselves from liability if anyone goes after that policeman.