Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 01:28 PM Aug 2014

Twitter Suspends Anonymous's Account for Posting Photo of a Ferguson Police Officer

Twitter suspended an account affiliated with the Internet group Anonymous on Thursday after the group posted a photo claiming to reveal the identity of the police officer who killed unarmed teenager Michael Brown over the weekend in Ferguson, Mo.

St. Louis County Police Department denied that the photo belongs to the officer who shot Brown. The department has thus far refused to publicly disclose the identity of the officer who fired at Brown, citing concern for his safety.

Twitter declined to comment on the matter, noting its general policy to not discuss individual accounts "for privacy and security reasons."

But a spokesman did point to the site's published rules, which state:"You may not publish or post other people's private and confidential information, such as credit card numbers, street address or Social Security/National Identity numbers, without their express authorization and permission."

http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/twitter-suspends-anonymous-account-for-posting-a-photo-of-ferguson-police-officer-20140814

https://twitter.com/account/suspended





https://twitter.com/feministabulous/status/499973149686259712/photo/1



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ancianita

(36,161 posts)
1. Wait. How can Twitter suspend ANON if they're anonymous? Does it suspend all who've passed the
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 01:31 PM
Aug 2014

name on, too?

Also, the name's been posted on Facebook.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. They have a hundred accounts or more--they've suspended that particular one.
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 01:34 PM
Aug 2014

The horse has left the barn on that policeman. Once the name was out, it was easy to find out a great deal about him.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
4. I hope they shut down all the accounts belonging to people who tweeted Jada's picture.
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 01:38 PM
Aug 2014

Every single one should have been shut down.

Oh look, the alleged rapist's account is still active
twitter.com/WhiteboyLaflare

You know all his buddies who also tweeted her pic still have their accounts too.


Rape culture doesn't exist though.

procon

(15,805 posts)
5. Police are public servants
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 01:51 PM
Aug 2014

Twitter is wrong. These are not ordinary "private" citizens like you or me. A police badge and ID includes a name and photo. It s a legal public record which is supposed to be produced on demand to prove their legitimate authority.

I suspect someone in power called Twitter and asked for a favor.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
6. No fan of that cop, but twitter isn't wrong.
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 04:08 PM
Aug 2014

It's a service that you sign up for and you agree with their tos to use it, much like DU. If they don't like you, they can dump you--it's not like a you have a "right" to a twitter account--they have the right to refuse service to anyone they'd like.

Twitter's lawyers probably looked at the context of the situation and decided that they didn't want to be an unwitting accessory to murder, so they took down the pic and closed the account to limit their liability. I don't think they were reacting to "higher authority," I think they were reacting to their bottom line. By doing that, they shield themselves from liability if anyone goes after that policeman.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Twitter Suspends Anonymou...