General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums(California) Tea party lawmaker's agenda suffers another blow
The outspoken Republican from San Bernardino was elected to the Legislature two years ago on a pledge to rein in regulations and shrink the bureaucracy that he said was strangling the state's economy. So far, his signature initiatives -- importing Arizona's controversial immigration law to California and rolling back state financial aid to undocumented students -- have failed.
On Monday, he returned to the Capitol from the spring recess with a more modest goal: streamlining smog checks.
Under current law, most car owners must get a smog check every two years, receiving a certificate that is considered valid for 90 days. If owners want to sell or transfer a vehicle outside that 90-day window, they must obtain a new smog certificate for the buyer. Donnelly's bill, AB 1613, would eliminate that requirement, extending the certificate until the car's next scheduled inspection.
He pitched it to the Assembly Transportation Committee as a common-sense measure that would save Californians time and money while maintaining environmental protections. Donnelly, who often rails against the California Air Resources Board, tried to appeal to his Democratic colleagues.
Democrats were not convinced. They cited concerns about weakening the state's smog check program and harming air quality. The bill died, 3 to 8.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2012/04/from-immigration-to-smog-checks-tea-party-lawmakers-agenda-suffers-another-blow.html
The tea party seems to be having some difficulties in California.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)I wasn't aware of the current smog check requirements when selling a car, but it sounds less like an air quality measure than an attempt to glom onto a few more bucks when somebody sells their vehicle. After all, if a car passes a smog check and it's good for two years, the condition of that car doesn't change just because it's sold.
Traffic tickets exist primarily as a revenue producing program, not as a safety measure, and it sounds like somebody figured out a way to squeeze some money out of car sales as well.
Even a douchebag can be right once in awhile.
frylock
(34,825 posts)never understood why a vehicle would need to rechecked before selling, other than to generate revenue for the state.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)California also has a law where sometimes you have to get a smog check and you're not allowed to know what went wrong if you fail. You have to go get repairs from someone else, and hope for the best when you get your smog check again.
This offers no environmental benefit and I am surprised an initiative hasn't been passed to stop this.