Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPrivatiation failed Britain - Sale of the century: the privatisation scam - Good Read (Long)
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/22/sale-of-century-privatisation-scam<snip>
Privatisation promised to turn the UK into an island of small shareholders. It failed: the faceless state bureaucrats have been replaced by faceless (better-paid) private bureaucrats and big foreign corporations. How did we get to this point?
Privatisation failed to demonstrate the case made by the privatisers that private companies are always more competent than state-owned ones that private bosses, chasing the carrot of bonuses and dodging the stick of bankruptcy, will always do better than their state-employed counterparts. Through euphemisms such as "wealth creation" and "enjoying the rewards of success" Thatcher and her allies have promoted the notion that greed on the part of a private executive elite is the chief and sufficient engine of prosperity for all. The result has been 35 years of denigration of the concept of duty and public service, as well as a squalid ideal of all work as something that shouldn't be cared about for its own sake, but only for the money it brings. The magic dust of the market was of little use to the bosses of the newly privatised Railtrack in the mid-1990s. They thought they could sack people with impunity not just signalling and maintenance staff but expert engineers and researchers and carry out a massive line-upgrade cheaply with the most advanced new technology. Unfortunately the people who could have told them that the new technology didn't exist were the people they had sacked. As a result, the company went bust in 2002, and had to be renationalised.
A Royal Mail passes the Houses of Parliament behind it, in central London, September 12, 2013. A Royal Mail passes the Houses of Parliament behind it, in central London, September 12, 2013. Photograph: EDDIE KEOGH/Reuters
Privatisation failed to make firms compete or give customers more choice said to be the canonical virtues of privatisation. Pretty hard, you would think, to privatise water companies, when they are all monopolies, with nobody to compete with, and can't offer customers a choice neither the choice of which supplier to use nor the choice of whether to take a service or not. And yet the English water companies were privatised, and in such a way that customers have been overcharged ever since. The privatisers loved competition, but the actual privatised competitors hate it. The competitive vision of those who designed Britain's electricity privatisation a rumbustious, referee-supervised free-for-all between sellers and makers of electricity old and new, large and small has degenerated into an opaque oligopoly of a handful of giant players.
The impression grows, on reading Thatcher's autobiography, that she believed the transformational effect of privatisation was such as to turn executives into self-consciously moral, patriotic, civically minded entrepreneurs like her father; as if a monopoly on water supply for several million people were a local grocery shop in a small English town in the 1940s. Privatisation, she claimed, was "the greatest shift of ownership and power away from the state to individuals and their families in any country outside the former communist bloc". The reality is that the faceless state bureaucrats of the old electricity boards have been replaced by the faceless (and better paid) private bureaucrats of the electricity companies. Not only are the privatised utilities big, remote corporations; most of them are no longer British, and no longer owned by small shareholders. Indeed electricity and water privatisation could not have failed more absolutely to foster the emergence of world-beating, innovative British companies. Most of the electricity made and sold in England is now owned by dynamic, tech-savvy companies from western Europe, a region doomed, Thatcher thought, by creeping socialism. As a direct result of the way electricity was privatised, much of it has now been renationalised but by France, not Britain. Of the nine big English water and sewerage firms, six have achieved the seemingly impossible feat of being privatised a second time, delisted from the stock market by east Asian conglomerates or by private equity consortia. Today much of England's water industry is, it is true, in the hands of individuals and their families, but they don't use English water; they are millions of former civil servants in Canada, Australia and the Netherlands, investing, unwittingly, through their pension funds. The National Health Service is a special case. It hasn't been privatised, and the political parties vie with each other to show that it's safest in their hands. Yet it has been commercialised and repeatedly reorganised, with competition introduced, in such a way as to create a kind of shadowing of an as-yet-unrealised private health insurance system. The story of the transformation of the NHS is part of the wider story of the inheritance of the Thatcher legacy by a Blairite Labour administration over-filled with politicians who struggled to separate their ambitions for Britain from their ambitions for their own and their families' ascent into the six-figure-income class. After their Sisyphean struggles with the Tories and the conservative socialists in their own party, New Labour in power yielded with all too apparent relief to the charms of the business world. It wasn't the creation of foundation trusts for hospitals or academy schools, or support for housing associations that was the mistake, rather a lack of awareness that without elaborate safeguards these structures might prove mere waypoints to the next set of privatisations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 699 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Privatiation failed Britain - Sale of the century: the privatisation scam - Good Read (Long) (Original Post)
malaise
Aug 2014
OP
failing here too but dems/repubs elected officials & friends are making too much $$ to stop nt
msongs
Aug 2014
#1
K&R. We need to fight against it. Too many Dems supporting privitization these days.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Aug 2014
#2
msongs
(67,433 posts)1. failing here too but dems/repubs elected officials & friends are making too much $$ to stop nt
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)2. K&R. We need to fight against it. Too many Dems supporting privitization these days.
That too many Rs and Ls do so, could go without saying.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)3. Kick and Rec for truth
Privatization kills people and enriches the pigs at the top. And almost always results in unregulated and unaccountable monopoly since antitrust laws are no more. Democratic socialism is the only sensible way.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)4. Privatization has never failed
to give to the rich what used to belong to all of us.
That's all it was ever really expected to do.
JEB
(4,748 posts)5. Privatization is scamming the public to get the Government funds.
I don't think the fucking army can peel a potato without giving some corporation a shitload of money.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)6. K & R and thank you for posting about privatisation. n/t