Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 10:57 PM Apr 2012

The Republicans did not want a "conservative alternative" to Romney

A lot of polling showed dissatisfaction among RWers. Romney kept under-performing. A series of utterly absurd figures would rocket ahead in the polls if they said they were "real" conservatives.

But the RW did not want a conservative alternative to Romney. Yes, they were mildly titillated by the idea... it was something to talk to pollsters about. If they could wave a magic wand and resurrect Reagan they would have been pleased.

They wanted a conservative the way I want a pinball machine. It might be fun, but I'm not like I'm actually going to BUY one.

If there had been actual public desire for a conservative then some rank-and-file conservatives would have donated some money to a "real conservative" candidate.

They didn't. Not only were Newt and Santorum outspent by Romney a zillion to one, they were both financed by individual wealthy lunatics. Without Citizens United Santorum and Gingrich would have been lucky to raise a million dollars.

Consider how much money Hillary and Obama both raised in 2008, and that was for two idealogically similar candidates! There was a lot of real excitement. People wanted to donate... to be involved.

Nobody wanted Romney. That's for damn sure.

But the RW Republicans just didn't care. They muttered some pitiful discontent then fell listlessly in line. They never felt like they controlled the process anyway... they were alienated from their own party.

They are depressed. That doesn't mean they aren't dangerous, but that's the term for this whole pug nominating process: Chronic depression.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Republicans did not want a "conservative alternative" to Romney (Original Post) cthulu2016 Apr 2012 OP
This primary season resolved nothing for the future of the GOP. Old and In the Way Apr 2012 #1
Wall Street wanted Mit and they got him. nevergiveup Apr 2012 #2

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
1. This primary season resolved nothing for the future of the GOP.
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 11:05 PM
Apr 2012

And, assuming a Rmoney shellacking in November, there's going to be a huge fight for the soul of the Party. The monied establishment will have to either surrender the Party to the Religious, socially conservative teabbagers who are the vocal face of the Party today...or cut them loose to start a 3rd Party. The Teabaggers are stupid, but even they can see that they were gamed out of many of the primaries in this cycle. A loss by Rmoney will convince them that a moderate can't win and only a true conservative like Santorum or Palin can lead them to the Promised Land. Personally, I'd love to see Big Business Conservatives and Big Religion Conservatives part company. It could neutralize the money advantage that Citizen's United has bestowed on the GOP.

nevergiveup

(4,764 posts)
2. Wall Street wanted Mit and they got him.
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 12:16 AM
Apr 2012

In my mind there was never any doubt he would get the nomination. If Romney goes down, which is likely, Wall Street will once again in 2016 select the Republican candidate. It will be Christie, Jeb Bush or someone similar and you can "bank" on it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Republicans did not w...