Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kali

(55,014 posts)
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 09:42 PM Aug 2014

Non-disruptive Meta Thread! Dear Hosts,



I did a boo-boo last night and got removed from Hosting a day early. Not complaining, but I didn't get a chance to do a thanks and good-bye thread in there so this will have to do! It is a little disorienting to not have ANY red file folders on the left of the screen on the Latest page. I have been a host pretty much from the beginning and several MIRT terms. Those are always hard adjusting at first but this is my first time not hosting.

I think the new system is working pretty good and want to thank all of you for past, present, and future participation. It seems with my little transgression it will be at least 3 months until I can volunteer for anything, so I will focus on participating "out here" in the main forums and groups.

I already miss working as a group, the tasks, and the links to threads I might not otherwise see.

Thanks again,
Kali
158 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Non-disruptive Meta Thread! Dear Hosts, (Original Post) Kali Aug 2014 OP
We demand that host threads be able to be read by members RobertEarl Aug 2014 #1
meh Kali Aug 2014 #7
+1 SixString Aug 2014 #10
A few hosts have posted threads from the forum RobertEarl Aug 2014 #96
"We demand" zappaman Aug 2014 #11
what's this "we" stuff? hfojvt Aug 2014 #60
Absolutely NOT Omaha Steve Aug 2014 #84
Tell us about openness and transparency, "RobertEarl"...nt SidDithers Aug 2014 #92
You know that is entirely the administrators' call BainsBane Aug 2014 #93
I'm certain that nearly all of their attention is focused on TexasTowelie Aug 2014 #105
Oh dear. NuclearDem Aug 2014 #129
What do you mean a "good-bye thread"? panader0 Aug 2014 #2
no way! just from hosting the main Forums. Kali Aug 2014 #4
So it's a 'Goodbye Cruel Hosts Forum, I'm off to join the circus' post pinboy3niner Aug 2014 #6
Circus, Lounge Kali Aug 2014 #8
Some say that about GD pinboy3niner Aug 2014 #9
Nah, GD is the Colosseum. And the lions are always hungry... NutmegYankee Aug 2014 #57
to be very SERIOUS for a second Kali Aug 2014 #63
What was the hide about? BainsBane Aug 2014 #3
I'll send it PM Kali Aug 2014 #5
You're a good egg, Kali. zappaman Aug 2014 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #13
if it stood Kali Aug 2014 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #17
"Are you going to be mad at juror #1? " was the purpose just for snark? and yet.... seabeyond Aug 2014 #31
omg, how pathetic. Here's her thread title: Non-Disruptive Meta Thread R B Garr Aug 2014 #36
thanks Kali Aug 2014 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #21
And you have Atman's BainsBane Aug 2014 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #24
Your moral indignation toward Kali is ironic BainsBane Aug 2014 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #27
wait, now you insult baines writing style, cause she create informed posts? seabeyond Aug 2014 #33
I'm not concerned BainsBane Aug 2014 #58
One thing a good writer knows BainsBane Aug 2014 #54
of course you are not concerned. who gripes cause you make well informed arguments that actually seabeyond Aug 2014 #65
omg Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2014 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #76
really? you are going to this tired, again. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author BainsBane Aug 2014 #54
"Are you going to be mad at juror #1?" pure snark for no apparent reason. seabeyond Aug 2014 #32
excuse me? Kali Aug 2014 #23
Evidently BainsBane Aug 2014 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #28
I don't get it. Kali Aug 2014 #29
I take the argument to be BainsBane Aug 2014 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #43
i want to know who "they" are. it is all very mysterious. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #46
They are anyone who doesn't do what they are supposed to. BainsBane Aug 2014 #56
Oh, that they BainsBane Aug 2014 #69
for sure. i was more gentle. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #35
Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #37
who is this "they" you are accusing of? and now more insults with grammar. seabeyond Aug 2014 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #49
two minutes, five minutes... no. i am clueless to your "they" . i do not have a clue why seabeyond Aug 2014 #70
you are starting to make less and less sense Kali Aug 2014 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #53
I see you got a hide. I just want to be honest with you... Kali Aug 2014 #87
How long is it going to take you to bring up the Sports Illustrated picture you posted? R B Garr Aug 2014 #48
i woke up the dog, with that burst of laughter. ya. that. lol. me me me, i did it, me. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #67
omg. i have a dog. lying on my floor. i laughed. he woke up.but... now that you remind me, seabeyond Aug 2014 #74
Oh, my. You said dog. :) I see the problem now. R B Garr Aug 2014 #86
you are funny. seabeyond Aug 2014 #89
lol, it really is laughable, especially at this point :) R B Garr Aug 2014 #73
i said dog. that can get any of us in hof, in trouble. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #75
Hey, don't begrudge her claim to fame BainsBane Aug 2014 #59
It's so incredibly pathetic, lol. She doesn't even realize how much power she hands over to you R B Garr Aug 2014 #81
It's wasted energy BainsBane Aug 2014 #83
yes, and look where it got her -- caught in her own web. R B Garr Aug 2014 #95
Did you see the thread in my honor BainsBane Aug 2014 #103
Maybe...? She lashed out at some phantom person...that was you? R B Garr Aug 2014 #106
Yes, and I didn't actually realize it was me right away BainsBane Aug 2014 #107
Ok, now I remember some of that. I never paid that much attention to that PPR'd R B Garr Aug 2014 #110
awesome gaspee Aug 2014 #135
A couple of others have gone since BainsBane Aug 2014 #137
She doesn't need to! You did. Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #114
Well, it did earn her this BainsBane Aug 2014 #116
Isnt that the same picture? Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #118
Did you post the moon bombing thread? BainsBane Aug 2014 #119
Actually, what i remember was people asserting there was some nefarious conspiracy to get her to Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #120
Well, we did have a certain host of a safe haven group BainsBane Aug 2014 #121
The ratio was one picture, followed by 3 weeks of flippin' out over it. Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #122
Three weeks that went according to plan BainsBane Aug 2014 #123
Personal attacks are generally considered bad form here, no matter the context. Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #125
The jury saw it differently BainsBane Aug 2014 #126
Eh. I wouldn't use that word here, no. Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #128
These little chats are so informative BainsBane Aug 2014 #127
Edit (another dupe) BainsBane Aug 2014 #123
i do not think i posted in the thread either. didnt give a shit about it. it was valentines week. seabeyond Aug 2014 #132
Oh, she needs to. And you need to, as well. R B Garr Aug 2014 #138
It is the goal, and then chase me down to brag about it in another thread. Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2014 #144
Yeah, I saw that now. That's just confirmation that anything typed is alerted R B Garr Aug 2014 #156
I don't know... I'm skeptical, when told I need something. I was told I needed a thneed, once Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #150
You weren't the only one to say it. JTFrog Aug 2014 #66
So I got called to jury duty over this post MohRokTah Aug 2014 #136
This message was self-deleted by its author RiffRandell Aug 2014 #18
huh? Kali Aug 2014 #20
you keep waving the white flag and it doesnt seem to be helping. seabeyond Aug 2014 #38
Kali's sigline takes on a new and apt meaning here pinboy3niner Aug 2014 #41
this was bizarre stepping into. and it just keeps on giving, lol. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #44
It's taking all my restraint BainsBane Aug 2014 #102
time for a new sig line? Kali Aug 2014 #50
better? seabeyond Aug 2014 #64
... Kali Aug 2014 #72
bah hahahah. more my style, ok. i gotcha. i tried. lol. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #77
I love Kill Bill, too! R B Garr Aug 2014 #98
it is an excellent movie. the song is a fav. seabeyond Aug 2014 #101
sorry we ruined your nice thread. really. this subthread got the best of me. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #80
doesn't bother me at all. Kali Aug 2014 #85
man! love this whacky place. and waking my dog. lol. i put him to bed. he is safe now. nt seabeyond Aug 2014 #88
but really, i gotta know. seabeyond Aug 2014 #90
I have no freaking idea Kali Aug 2014 #94
ya. that. weird must be explained, lol. i gotta understand. anyway. i am off, to bed seabeyond Aug 2014 #99
Well I love this thread! JustAnotherGen Aug 2014 #131
Overrated, in my opinion.... like a lot of Tarantino's work Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #115
Catch you on the flip side. aikoaiko Aug 2014 #14
Well, this is a nice OP etherealtruth Aug 2014 #30
well, I got that way a couple times last night... Kali Aug 2014 #42
I think its the nature of being human. etherealtruth Aug 2014 #47
thank you! Kali Aug 2014 #52
Short answer BainsBane Aug 2014 #61
Sad n/t etherealtruth Aug 2014 #71
It was a pleasure serving with you. NutmegYankee Aug 2014 #40
You can still sign up for mirt. hrmjustin Aug 2014 #62
yeah, someone mentioned that in a PM Kali Aug 2014 #79
I like mirt better than hosting. when they nuke it is normally over with unless hrmjustin Aug 2014 #82
DU rec... SidDithers Aug 2014 #91
and obviously the hot-heads who argue and get hidden posts not being allowed to host Kali Aug 2014 #97
Meh, I've seen the work you've done for DU on MIRT... SidDithers Aug 2014 #100
BREAKING: "Non-disruptive Meta Thread" opens cosmic portal to the old Meta forum. Details at 11. Electric Monk Aug 2014 #104
Irony, the shackles of youth. Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #109
Lol, dont bring the "kink" in, is not allowed darkangel218 Aug 2014 #111
You mean this opera involves handcuffs? Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #112
Ohh, now you did it! RUN!! darkangel218 Aug 2014 #113
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #108
Locking. Warren DeMontague Aug 2014 #117
Why I oughta! NuclearDem Aug 2014 #130
Rec for thanking other hosts, unrec for those turning it into disruptive meta. uppityperson Aug 2014 #133
I'm sure the other hosts will appreciate your farewell post. MineralMan Aug 2014 #134
you? Kali Aug 2014 #139
I didn't keep a record of the link. MineralMan Aug 2014 #140
It was bullshit, friend. I nearly got one, too. nt msanthrope Aug 2014 #141
As Skinner says: MineralMan Aug 2014 #151
This thread is like swiss cheese... lot of holes boston bean Aug 2014 #142
"it's the right thing to do" Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2014 #143
Really? This, from you? pintobean Aug 2014 #145
are you saying I should have deleted? really? This, from you? Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2014 #146
Woooshhh pintobean Aug 2014 #147
that is the sound of me jetting outta here. Ciao! Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2014 #149
Here's a link to her apology pintobean Aug 2014 #152
what do i need to accept an apology for. is one owed to me? boston bean Aug 2014 #153
No, resume kicking her. pintobean Aug 2014 #154
ive done something wrong, now!? boston bean Aug 2014 #155
Sorry to hear that Kali. ScreamingMeemie Aug 2014 #148
For some reason mimi85 Sep 2014 #157
hi mimi85! Kali Sep 2014 #158
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. We demand that host threads be able to be read by members
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 09:49 PM
Aug 2014

Hiding host threads from the People is not in good keeping with openness and transparency. All but hosts can be blocked from posting in those threads and there is no reason for us to not be able to read what the hosts are saying about the members.

Thanks.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
7. meh
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:12 PM
Aug 2014

it would just cause worse meta crap - if your record is clean and you have a star you can sign up and read all you want.

most of the alerts lately have just been repeated attempts to post gun threads in GD. those and the folks who can't follow directions for posting in Latest Breaking News, - it is pretty mellow now that the crew is thinned out a bit and the GD guidelines are more clear.

SixString

(1,057 posts)
10. +1
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:36 PM
Aug 2014

The DU3 promise of transparency is pretty much like the Obama admin. promise of transparency.

Practically nonexistent.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
96. A few hosts have posted threads from the forum
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:53 AM
Aug 2014

And you might not believe the caterwauling that a few of the hosts spew.

Hence the idea that if they knew, and we knew, what the hosts had to put up with, it just might clean the place up.

It is admitted that the place is cleaner these days. I wonder who else they booted because of the caterwauling?

Kali

(55,014 posts)
4. no way! just from hosting the main Forums.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 09:58 PM
Aug 2014

I was planning to say adios to the host crew today, as it was supposed to be my last day.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
57. Nah, GD is the Colosseum. And the lions are always hungry...
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:57 PM
Aug 2014

I swear every time I enter GD I almost have to chant "We who are about to die salute you".

Kali

(55,014 posts)
63. to be very SERIOUS for a second
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:03 AM
Aug 2014

the Lounge gets more respect from me than just about any part of DU, and I know that you know why.

OK enough of that, pants off and back to the absurdity, (and I think I may have to thank someone in this thread for providing just a bit of that, even if it was not entirely intended to be absurd)

Response to Kali (Original post)

Response to Kali (Reply #15)

Response to RiffRandell (Reply #16)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
31. "Are you going to be mad at juror #1? " was the purpose just for snark? and yet....
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:40 PM
Aug 2014

you feel in a position to lecture kali?

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
36. omg, how pathetic. Here's her thread title: Non-Disruptive Meta Thread
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:44 PM
Aug 2014

which you immediately use as an opportunity to be disruptive and to pat yourself on the back about how you almost got a hide. Almost! Wow.

It's getting pretty easy to see why people just want a safe place to talk without the hysteria of those that can't accept that their disruption is not wanted because it's just a way to get posts hidden. How lame.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
19. thanks
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:17 PM
Aug 2014

no, not mad a juror 1. sorry your alert failed, I sort of expected I might get a hide on that. guess most of them could see what was going on in the thread.

Response to Kali (Reply #19)

Response to BainsBane (Reply #22)

Response to BainsBane (Reply #25)

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
58. I'm not concerned
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:58 PM
Aug 2014

When her writing brings in millions of dollars for an organization, then I'll worry about her critique of my style.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
65. of course you are not concerned. who gripes cause you make well informed arguments that actually
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:05 AM
Aug 2014

take more than a sentence or two. or a picture.

i mean.

really

reading is a good thing. in my house anyway.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #54)

Response to RiffRandell (Reply #27)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
32. "Are you going to be mad at juror #1?" pure snark for no apparent reason.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:41 PM
Aug 2014

i thought so too.

funny.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #26)

Kali

(55,014 posts)
29. I don't get it.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:39 PM
Aug 2014

the jury was stacked by my loyal friends? who are they? the Lounge? HoF? can't be you guys, you are all in the thread.

I don't know who the hell she could be referring to. sounds downright paranoid. anybody reading the thread can see he needed to STFU, it was only a matter of time before somebody said it.

guy whining for 30 or 40 posts about something that didn't even happen the way he thought and using the exact term he THOUGHT got him in trouble in every freaking reply while insisting he only used it once - ever - and it was for a good reason, dammit!....talk about some strange, possibly Freudian shit there

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
34. I take the argument to be
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:42 PM
Aug 2014

that the jurors could not have voted on content but must have voted based on the fact they like you, given she thinks your post so egregious. Not only did she alert on it, but unsatisfied that the alert failed, she feels compelled to bring it up here in an entirely unrelated context.

He may have needed to shut up, but Kali, you said the f word. You musn't say the f word to boys. It's not ladylike.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #34)

Response to Kali (Reply #29)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
39. who is this "they" you are accusing of? and now more insults with grammar.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:49 PM
Aug 2014

you know how totally counterproductive your lecture to kali is becoming?

Response to seabeyond (Reply #39)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
70. two minutes, five minutes... no. i am clueless to your "they" . i do not have a clue why
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:07 AM
Aug 2014

you feel i should know. so, i take it, you are just sticking with your vague "they".

Response to Kali (Reply #45)

Kali

(55,014 posts)
87. I see you got a hide. I just want to be honest with you...
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:26 AM
Aug 2014

it wasn't an alert from me. I got locked out of alerting for 24 hours early this morning.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
48. How long is it going to take you to bring up the Sports Illustrated picture you posted?
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:52 PM
Aug 2014

Wow! You posted a picture, and were thrilled with your disruption. Thrilled, don't ya' know. So fucking lame.

Response to seabeyond (Reply #51)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
74. omg. i have a dog. lying on my floor. i laughed. he woke up.but... now that you remind me,
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:11 AM
Aug 2014

i can see how you would take it that way. no. i have a dog. i laughed loudly and woke my four legged dog up....

courgie/pomeranian.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
86. Oh, my. You said dog. :) I see the problem now.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:23 AM
Aug 2014

You can just feel the desperation in trying to get one of your posts hidden. Family dog reference = run to the jury! Run!

omg. You hang in there. They are really working you, big time.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
73. lol, it really is laughable, especially at this point :)
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:09 AM
Aug 2014

It looks like they "them", lol, are stepping it up after redqueen's departure thread like it's some notch in their collective belts. And always with you, sea. You're always hunted down. It gets really old to see people deliberately pick and pick just to try and get posts hidden. Omg, so transparent.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
81. It's so incredibly pathetic, lol. She doesn't even realize how much power she hands over to you
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:17 AM
Aug 2014

LOL, and do they rotate their nit-pick shifts on you all? Holy crap! I can see getting heated about issues, but even without issues, they just stalk and stalk and stalk. It's really, really pathetic, hysterical even They are just obsessed.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
83. It's wasted energy
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:21 AM
Aug 2014

because truthfully I think very little about them.

Yeah, it's the absence of issues that is especially ridiculous. It's a lot of angst about nothing. So what if someone doesn't like a random stranger on the internet? It's easy enough to ignore the person. I certainly can get wound up from time to time. I did early this morning, but you have to let it go and move on. It's self-destructive to hold on to that stuff.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
95. yes, and look where it got her -- caught in her own web.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:51 AM
Aug 2014

Yet, you can tell she was shamelessly gunning for a hide on one of you, especially sea. You handle it really well, I must say. It's impressive, but I'm sure it's tiresome at times, and that's what they play to. They just keep up the barrage of nonsense, and sooner or later, they'll get lucky and get a post hidden. Except tonight it backfired on her, LOL.


BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
103. Did you see the thread in my honor
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:13 AM
Aug 2014

She posted in GD a couple of months ago? That was quite the spectacle.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
106. Maybe...? She lashed out at some phantom person...that was you?
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:37 AM
Aug 2014

I mean, usually it is you, so that's gotta be a given. I forgot what was behind that fit, but it's obvious it doesn't take much. There's no logic to it, just emotional fits.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
107. Yes, and I didn't actually realize it was me right away
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:45 AM
Aug 2014

Until everyone said it was definitely about me.

As for what prompted it, I couldn't say for sure. It did happen the day (or day after) Quinnox was PPR'd though.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
110. Ok, now I remember some of that. I never paid that much attention to that PPR'd
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:01 AM
Aug 2014

poster until it was obvious he started posting inappropriate personal threads as if he was daring someone about something...

But now it makes sense that she had a reaction because that poster harassed all the right people, so to speak, you obviously being one of them.

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
135. awesome
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 10:21 AM
Aug 2014

I had no idea that guy got ppr'd - I've been avoiding DU for a couple of months - just popping in here and there when I wanted a quick rundown of news. He made DU suck for me with his nastiness and deliberate provoking of feminists.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
114. She doesn't need to! You did.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:15 AM
Aug 2014

And i suspect that clusterfuck of a month-long meltdown which followed the posting of that picture, will be what people remember most about DU in 2014, in years to come.

It's firmly ensconced in legend, right up there with the moon bombing.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
116. Well, it did earn her this
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:20 AM
Aug 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1114&pid=12921
So it would seem all went according to plan.

The joke, which you clearly didn't get, is that she does bring it up all the time. "It was me. It was me." She likes to take credit for it, so we should respect her agency. Don't you think?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
118. Isnt that the same picture?
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:24 AM
Aug 2014


I bring up the moon bombing all the time, too.

Both are clear examples, of my mind, of the tendency of some folks in this place to get real weird about real weird stuff. For weeks, even.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
119. Did you post the moon bombing thread?
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:28 AM
Aug 2014

That was before my time.

Yes. It's the same photo. That's the point. It was expressing approval for her having posted the thread.

She likes to talk about how everyone gave her shit, when of course virtually no one mentioned her during that period, which clearly she found frustrating since she ran around telling everyone "it was me." I certainly am not one to deny another woman's agency. Her choices and what she claims as her successes are hers to make.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
120. Actually, what i remember was people asserting there was some nefarious conspiracy to get her to
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:36 AM
Aug 2014

Post it. That the posting was a deliberate attack on women on DU, and that the posting was done specifically with the knowledge that it would precipitate 3 weeks or more of complete shit-losing in GD, over it.

When, after all, previous swimsuit issues had been posted, in previous years. What sort of Nostradamus- like prognostication skills were required to predict what would happen with this one?

And of course, all of the "disruption" could have been avoided if folks hadn't spent 3 weeks flippin' out over that one picture of women on a beach.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
121. Well, we did have a certain host of a safe haven group
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:50 AM
Aug 2014

Claim it was a form of protest against . . . what was it . . . "mean girls," the wrong kind of "feminism," political correctness or something along those lines, so that certainly played into the notion it was a joint operation, as does the post I just linked to. But she posted it, and she claims credit for the whole thing, so far be it from me to belittle her successes.

The disruption could have been prevented if people had remembered they were in the 21st century instead of 1962. That of course is impossible for some.

It is hardly surprising that your solution to problems is for "feminists" to keep their mouths shut and let their betters control public space.

I myself avoided what clearly was deliberate flamebait. Now you insist the fault lies not with the person who posted the flamebait or even those who responded, but with people who did not post in that thread. It must be awful to have to share the planet with women who don't accept our responsibility for the decline of Western civilization that has accompanied our refusal to stay in our place.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
122. The ratio was one picture, followed by 3 weeks of flippin' out over it.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:55 AM
Aug 2014

And again, like i said, the SI swimsuit issue was posted in previous years as well.

But if my goal is supposedly to get people to keep their mouths shut, i must be doing a crap job.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
123. Three weeks that went according to plan
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 03:08 AM
Aug 2014

Indeed, you aren't doing a very good job of it, but that doesn't stop you from trying. Actually the escapade had the opposite effect. It allowed more than hundred members to witness misogyny in action through the continued dismissive and hostile responses to women who raised concerns about objectification. They then spoke out and said they finally understand that HOF had not been exaggerating the prevalence of misogyny.

Now tonight we had another stunt out of outrage that a man who had referred to women as "skanks" dozens of times in a thread had been told to "shut the f up." That didn't turn out quite as planned either. Thems the breaks.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
125. Personal attacks are generally considered bad form here, no matter the context.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 03:17 AM
Aug 2014

Which is, as it should be.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
126. The jury saw it differently
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 03:22 AM
Aug 2014

I'm guessing because they shared the sentiment.

But yeah, calling women "skanks" wouldn't' be a personal attack. That's "freedom of speech." What people do get exercised about does reveal a great deal about who they are. Naturally someone who refers to women in the most vulgar ways must be held in esteem above the rest of the DU membership.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
128. Eh. I wouldn't use that word here, no.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 03:25 AM
Aug 2014

Despite my apparent reputation as all manner of foul things, I don't think I ever have.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
132. i do not think i posted in the thread either. didnt give a shit about it. it was valentines week.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 08:46 AM
Aug 2014

people were getting along. it was too peaceful. and it was her way of stirring shit. and instead of warrens mythical three weeks, it was a couple days. and instead of people giving shit about the OP it was thread after boob thread (until skinner and earl stepped in) to put women in their place, cause the place was united and happy and feeling good.

that is her.... it was me.... she is so proud of.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
138. Oh, she needs to. And you need to, as well.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 11:36 AM
Aug 2014

How else are you going to get posts hidden? That seems to be the goal. Look at the glee in which you talk about a "month-long meltdown" as if it's "Mission Accomplished." So transparent.

Moon bombing? Someone posted about the moon for the sole purpose of being disruptive and getting posts hidden? Really?

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
144. It is the goal, and then chase me down to brag about it in another thread.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 06:08 PM
Aug 2014

yes.

this is what is going on.

grade school crap.

pure and simple.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
156. Yeah, I saw that now. That's just confirmation that anything typed is alerted
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 09:30 PM
Aug 2014

which is too pathetic for words.

But I did see Riff's apology thread, and I do feel bad for her if she is hurting. Sometimes you can do things and then look back and realize that what you did is not how you want to present yourself or have others view you. I feel bad, too, because this was Kali's thread and the apology thread is for Kali, too. But I do feel bad for my involvement as well.

It just gets really frustrating seeing some of the posters I have grown to really like and admire get harassed just to try and silence them! So frustrating. I see how you are also hunted down (like in this thread even!). Hang in there. I really love your sense of humor!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
150. I don't know... I'm skeptical, when told I need something. I was told I needed a thneed, once
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 07:11 PM
Aug 2014

and next thing I knew all my barbaloots had crummies in their barbaloot suit tummies, and the pond for the swommee-swans was full of gluppity-glup and shluppity-shlupp.

No, no. There's only one person's advice I will take, when told what it is, what all I need.



 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
136. So I got called to jury duty over this post
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 11:00 AM
Aug 2014

I canceled my way out of it halfway through. This is completely silly on both sides and proper adjudication would remove this entire sub thread, possibly the entire thread.

Response to Kali (Reply #15)

Kali

(55,014 posts)
20. huh?
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:17 PM
Aug 2014

If I was acting like a total asshole and somebody told me to shut the fuck up I think I would probably just continue being an ass, but I would still deserve it.

The next morning I would hope that I would have enough self-awareness and shame to apologize for being such a jerk. I have no idea if he has done that. I suspect not.

Hope that answers your question, if not you will have to clarify. I am not sure I got your comment correctly or not.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
102. It's taking all my restraint
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:07 AM
Aug 2014

to not post what passed through my head when I read your post. It would have been good though.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
85. doesn't bother me at all.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:22 AM
Aug 2014

seems kind of enlightening, really. funny how it all happens around here. I figured that would get hidden way before the bot one and then it turns out I get to see the failed alert on it, the alerter, and some strange kind of flamey meta meltdown in my non-disruptive-meta meta thread. man! love this whacky place.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
90. but really, i gotta know.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:36 AM
Aug 2014

who is they. who do you think they is. cause there was strong reference to this... they. we, were all in the thread with you. riff was sure i know the they. i am clueless. i wont be able to sleep, wondering who "they" are. lol. who?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
99. ya. that. weird must be explained, lol. i gotta understand. anyway. i am off, to bed
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:58 AM
Aug 2014

you kali, have a good night.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
131. Well I love this thread!
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 07:01 AM
Aug 2014
And - I saw the post in question - and rolled over it because you were right. Maybe the "shut the . . ." wasn't the wisest course of action or choice of words to begin with -

But it was a post filled with awesome sauce and truthiness!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
115. Overrated, in my opinion.... like a lot of Tarantino's work
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:19 AM
Aug 2014

Really, they could have killed Bill in half the time. No one likes to wait.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
30. Well, this is a nice OP
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:40 PM
Aug 2014

it was good hosting with you for the short overlap we had. I think we all make mistakes ... or lose it every now and again.

I do not have a clue why ugliness showed up in such a nice thread ....? I think some folk are just combative ... or something

Kali

(55,014 posts)
42. well, I got that way a couple times last night...
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:50 PM
Aug 2014

sometimes you just let things out when maybe you shouldn't. other times it might be worth the trouble. funny how this one turned out.

I learn new things every time I read GD!

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
47. I think its the nature of being human.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:52 PM
Aug 2014

I am glad we had a little over lap ... although the truth is, not much goes on.

I thought it was a really lovely post ... still don't understand why anyone would want to disrupt a warm message, but i guess I don't have too!

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
40. It was a pleasure serving with you.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:49 PM
Aug 2014

I'm almost at mandatory retirement myself. As Labor day fades to night and the classic summer season comes to an end, so too will my duty as a host. I guess I'll have the time to focus on the foliage this fall.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
62. You can still sign up for mirt.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:03 AM
Aug 2014

I decided against signing up as a host for now. If I sign on I would be starting just before my mirt term ends and to be frank I detested the host forum and locking threads. Besides I like the 3 months off of mirt. 6 months in a row on mirt is a lot.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
79. yeah, someone mentioned that in a PM
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:14 AM
Aug 2014

I didn't realize you could have hides there. then I remembered there were a few who had a lot, even like 4!

hosting is much gentler now. I wouldn't worry about going ahead and trying it now. since the format change I think there was only one event that generated a longish thread or two, and it was still pretty dang civil.

the hard part for me was trying to help with the LBN alerts - I evidently do better with more flexible rules. LOL

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
82. I like mirt better than hosting. when they nuke it is normally over with unless
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:19 AM
Aug 2014

we get some of returning champions pissed.

I might sign up next year. I am looking foward to the quiet after the election.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
91. DU rec...
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:41 AM
Aug 2014

It appears to me that the new system for Hosts is working really well. I'm glad to see Hosts jump in to keep GD on track, and to not let disruptive threads fester.

Maybe it's just this particular group of Hosts, and the ones who used to cause much of the previous drama are not currently Hosting, but I want to add a big thumbs up for the Forum Hosts.

Keep up the great work!!

Sid

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
100. Meh, I've seen the work you've done for DU on MIRT...
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:01 AM
Aug 2014

"Hot-head" isn't a word I'd use to describe you.

Sid

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
104. BREAKING: "Non-disruptive Meta Thread" opens cosmic portal to the old Meta forum. Details at 11.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:18 AM
Aug 2014

Now, here's Tom with the weather

Response to Kali (Original post)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
117. Locking.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:22 AM
Aug 2014

I kid, i kid!

I know DU thanks you for your service.

It's funny that even non-disruptive meta is disruptive meta waiting to happen. Ah, this place.

It's like that book, "don't think of a heirophant"

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
133. Rec for thanking other hosts, unrec for those turning it into disruptive meta.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 08:56 AM
Aug 2014

delete rather than post to several replies to not add to it.

It is odd I bet, having no red folders. Thank you for volunteering your time.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
134. I'm sure the other hosts will appreciate your farewell post.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 10:16 AM
Aug 2014

I'm very sorry some turned it into something else. Like you, I recently had a post hidden, the first one in years. So, I won't be able to host, either for a while. I'll try even harder not to say anything that would cause another hidden post. I like the new rules for hosts. They make excellent sense. Only those who can disagree without becoming very disagreeable will be able to host. That's good, I think.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
139. you?
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:35 PM
Aug 2014

I need a link!

I certainly haven't gone years, but I do try to stay sane. Sometimes it is just worth it, though. And sometimes the ones you think might get hidden don't.

Hosting is kind of thankless, and it irks me when they get accused of things they don't even have the power to do by people who could just sign up and experience it for themselves. Of course that was even easier before the new requirements and the waiting list but still, to not avail oneself the means of examining the situation one is paranoid about seems kind of disingenuous.

I will definitely sign up again if and when my "record" is clean again. As a mostly Lounger, I benefited from occasionally following alerted links to threads I would normally never see. I am copmfortable and like working with consensus, and I like the teamwork it fosters between folks who rarely interact or are even antagonistic "out here." That happens with MIRT even more, so I continue to urge members to volunteer for both!

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
140. I didn't keep a record of the link.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:47 PM
Aug 2014

It was a 4-3 hide, and I don't feel it was justified, but there it is. I try very hard not to write anything that might get hidden. I'm disappointed in myself for failing in that case. Won't happen again, at least for a few years, I'm sure.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
146. are you saying I should have deleted? really? This, from you?
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 06:19 PM
Aug 2014

Honey. I am light years ahead. Don't even try to catch up.

*yawn*

mimi85

(1,805 posts)
157. For some reason
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 12:43 AM
Sep 2014

I've read two of these threads, going back and forth, and still don't have a fucking clue as to what they were about and why I give a shit. Apologies to all, for existing. Adios.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
158. hi mimi85!
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 11:59 AM
Sep 2014

I am not sure which other thread you are referring to, but my OP in this thread was aimed at the Hosts of DU. I had been one myself until the other night and just wanted to tell them thanks and good bye for a while - until such time as I can volunteer again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Non-disruptive Meta Threa...