General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren Finally Speaks on Israel/Gaza, Sounds Like Netanyahu
/snip/
During her time in the national spotlight, Warren has focused overwhelmingly on domestic issues, rarely venturing into foreign policy discussions. Many of those domestic views, particularly her strident-for-D.C. opposition to banks, have been admirable, elevating her to hero status for many progressives.
But when Warren has spoken on national security, she has invariably spouted warmed-over, banal Democratic hawk tripe of the kind that she just recited about Israel and Gaza. During her Senate campaign, for instance, she issued wildly militaristic and in some cases clearly false statements about Iran and its nuclear program that would have been comfortable on the pages of The Weekly Standard.
Even as conservative Democratic Senate candidates from red states such as Nebraskas Bob Kerrey were vehemently condemning the threat of war against Iran during their campaigns, Warren was claiming (contrary to the U.S. Governments own assessment) that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons, adding: I support strong sanctions against Iran and believe that the United States must also continue to take a leadership role in pushing other countries to implement strong sanctions as well. Those claims about Irans pursuit of nuclear weapons remained her position even after she was told that they squarely contradict the U.S. intelligence communitys clear assessment of Irans actions.
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/25567-focus-elizabeth-warren-finally-speaks-on-israelgaza-sounds-like-netanyahu
---(not that any of this will stop "progressives" from pushing her as the "progressive" candidate.)
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)To accept an endorsement from someone who believes that as a woman, she is "compelled" to get with barbarous man, and that Eliot Rodgers "had valid complaints"?
Laelth
(32,017 posts)I changed the word "compelled" to "driven" in the post in question (and even apologized for the use of the word "compelled" because I really was talking about a drive and not a compulsion, but I believe what I believe. I think humans are animals--that we have hormones, and that hormones affect our behavior (not control but affect).
I certainly hope that my noting that a broken clock can be right twice a day doesn't bar me from supporting Elizabeth Warren. I hope it doesn't bar me from being a Democrat. I hope it doesn't bar me from posting on DU.
Is that what you want?
-Laelth
7962
(11,841 posts)Man, this place has gone off the rails in the past couple years.
Chemisse
(30,813 posts)That's one reason I haven't hopped on the Warren bandwagon.
The true test of a politician is what they say and do AFTER they've wised up to the money/politics dynamics.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)I'm not sure that Bernie will however.
If they get old and crusty enough, they stop caring about the money - lol.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)yellowwoodII
(616 posts)That does it for her.
7962
(11,841 posts)Next thing you know, she'll come out against Russia annexing neighboring countries by force! Thats'll piss off some DUer's too!
Here's a news flash: Hamas just accepted the same proposal brokered by Egypt back when the war first started. THEY couldve saved all those lives lost by just being civilized. But they're NOT. Stop firing rockets and digging tunnels and you dont get the hell blown out of you.
Oh, and Iran IS pursuing nuclear weapons. Just watch and see how trustworthy they are with their word.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)but would have no problem voting for Warren if she wins the nomination.