Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 07:09 AM Aug 2014

Michelle Rhee’s Real Legacy: Here’s What’s Most Shameful About Her Reign

http://www.alternet.org/education/michelle-rhees-real-legacy-heres-whats-most-shameful-about-her-reign



In the last week or so, Michelle Rhee stepped down from StudentsFirst, an education reform organization that she founded four years ago. During her tenure at StudentsFirst, and before then, Rhee meticulously crafted her image as a firebrand who intended to shake up education in the country. Although most of the coverage of Rhee and her departure has focused on her education theatrics, her remarks on the issue of child poverty have been far more troubling.

In debates about education reform, one very common pattern of arguments has emerged. Education reformers like Rhee jump into the forum and confidently proclaim that poor students are failing to acquire good educations because of bad schools and bad teachers. Then, those who actually know things about child poverty respond that poverty, by itself, is a massive impediment to educational attainment because of its damaging effects on human functioning.

On its face, this response should pose no particular problem for education reformers. If they want, they can synthesize these two points by saying that both poverty and bad schools drag down educational attainment, and that we should therefore target both. Under such a synthesis, the reformers would come out in favor of very simple and empirically proven ways (they love data!) to dramatically reduce child poverty, and also make the case for their specific education reforms. But, with few exceptions, they don’t do that.

Instead, would-be reformers like Michelle Rhee totally abandon advocating for poverty reduction in favor of flavorless, politically neutral policies that don’t offend big donors. Generally, the refusal to recognize the role poverty plays in diminishing educational attainment forms three themes. In the first, reformers claim that people who chalk up low educational attainment to poverty are just excuse-making. This is, of course, manifestly absurd: Someone who says educational outcomes are harmed by poverty is not making an excuse out of poverty; they are identifying it as the (or a) cause. To argue such explanations are really excuses is as absurd as saying that Michelle Rhee is using “bad schools” as an excuse for low educational attainment. In other words, the “excuse” gambit is both false and nonsensical.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michelle Rhee’s Real Legacy: Here’s What’s Most Shameful About Her Reign (Original Post) xchrom Aug 2014 OP
This is a very important point about the education "reformers". greatlaurel Aug 2014 #1
AHA! Doctor_J Aug 2014 #2

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
1. This is a very important point about the education "reformers".
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 10:29 AM
Aug 2014

The simple fact is we know how to educate children trapped in poverty. We need to feed them breakfast, lunch and dinner, because children cannot learn when they are hungry. We need to make sure children have a safe place to live, so they are not at risk walking to and from school and are not living with the risk of being homeless. But most importantly, we put all children in classrooms with a ratio of 12 students to 1 teacher. The money and time that is being wasted on the ridiculous testing requirements, useless computer techniques like teaching kindergarteners to do power point and privatizing public schools should be going into reducing class sizes.

Here in Ohio, I know of one poverty stricken rural district that has been slammed by the budget cuts Governor John Kasich's(R) and the GOP controlled legislature have instituted in order to cut the state income tax for the wealthiest Ohioans. Class sizes for 6th graders are going to be between 30 and 40 kids per class.

Ohio has been a leader in moving public tax dollars from public schools to corporations and creepy religious outfits. From Plunderbund "Ohio taxpayers paid $914 million to Gulen-affiliated charter schools last year and school officials used much of the money to hire Turkish teachers and administrators with questionable credentials." http://www.plunderbund.com/2014/07/07/abj-investigation-reveals-more-financial-testing-and-immigration-troubles-at-gulen-charters/ See also this article "Are Religious Charter Schools The New Norm Under John Kasich?" http://www.plunderbund.com/2014/08/28/are-religious-charter-schools-the-new-norm-under-john-kasich/ "A Google search lists an address for FCI Academy as 2177 Mock Road, Columbus, and another Google search for the Living Faith Apostolic Church shows the church being located at the same address. The co-location of the church and the school, along with the fact that the wife of the church’s pastor is president of the charter school’s governing authority, should raise very serious issues with the Ohio Department of Education, State Auditor. Attorney General, and other state monitors related to the legal status of this school as a qualified recipient of state education funds."

How many public school teachers could we hire with $914 million dollars going to this one charter outfit? 16,321 with a salary of $56,000 per year. The theft of tax dollars in Ohio is an outrageous scandal that is being ignored while Kasich is just handed another 4 years as governor to continue his thefts in office for his corporate and religious backers.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
2. AHA!
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 04:02 PM
Aug 2014
would-be reformers like Michelle Rhee totally abandon advocating for poverty reduction in favor of flavorless, politically neutral policies that don’t offend big donors.


That explains why the president thinks highly of her.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michelle Rhee’s Real Lega...