Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

radiclib

(1,811 posts)
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 10:20 PM Sep 2014

Listen up, spuds. "Wreck havoc" is not a thing

Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:02 PM - Edit history (1)

The word is "wreak". Pronounced "reek". It means to perform, inflict, or execute (something). If one were to "wreck havoc", one would presumably eliminate havoc. Which would presumably be a good thing.
The massacre of the English language continues unabated. I don't know why I bother.

On edit: Mostly intended for the legions of illiterates who are paid big money to write and blather on the TeeVee. "..blahblah Isis wrecking havoc on the Middle East blahblah.."
No offense to you regular plain-speakin' folks. Plus, "spuds" is a Devo thing.
This has got to be the lamest thread ever top make the "Greatest" page. Make the madness stop!

248 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Listen up, spuds. "Wreck havoc" is not a thing (Original Post) radiclib Sep 2014 OP
Thank you! The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2014 #1
That should be: XemaSab Sep 2014 #2
Umm.. radiclib Sep 2014 #3
. XemaSab Sep 2014 #4
Way two subtle Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #34
Msplaced periods lead to manopause. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #68
Or sometimes pregnant pauses. n/t A Simple Game Sep 2014 #178
Indeed. eom littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #179
Punctuation inside or outside of quotes . . . MrModerate Sep 2014 #62
No, it's pretty much a rule. Atman Sep 2014 #107
The New York Times Style Book said it goes inside and the NYT was so respected then that merrily Sep 2014 #133
No, only commas and periods are always inside the quotation marks. SunSeeker Sep 2014 #186
an example? Voice for Peace Sep 2014 #192
Example 1 is correct. Example 2 should not have a period after the quote. SunSeeker Sep 2014 #197
what if the defendant had confessed emphatically? Voice for Peace Sep 2014 #209
Was the defendant heard to say, "I confess!"? SunSeeker Sep 2014 #230
:) Voice for Peace Sep 2014 #232
you have it right demigoddess Sep 2014 #216
It is a rule, but it always looks very odd for a list of things in quotes: Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #210
It doesn't look odd to me. SunSeeker Sep 2014 #214
it is this way demigoddess Sep 2014 #217
"Pretty much" is not very precise. MrModerate Sep 2014 #215
Correct. That's a pet peeve of mine, too. I know the correct way, as you show, but valerief Sep 2014 #127
I hate it when that happens. Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #201
I await with baited breath the affects of your efforts to reign in Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #5
Don't poke the bear! radiclib Sep 2014 #9
That's what they told the horny sourdough Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #11
Their, they're... JHB Sep 2014 #12
their kardonb Sep 2014 #191
Do you think you might loose your cool? a2liberal Sep 2014 #66
Just another looser? Two bad. Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #145
anhh..some of my favorite freeperisms..alongside casting asparagus and SoCalDem Sep 2014 #142
Just don't wait with abated breath n/t krispos42 Sep 2014 #196
Pedant. Warpy Sep 2014 #6
That's it radiclib Sep 2014 #10
You're actually PROUD of your sickening sexual proclivities??? Vine Gatherer Sep 2014 #50
Raining in... leftieNanner Sep 2014 #31
Or in the head of the poster Warpy Sep 2014 #64
A reduplication of redundancies Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #198
The other one that is like nails on the chalkboard is the incessant misuse of "free reign." MADem Sep 2014 #77
Or the misuse of the term "if you will", so overdone with that one Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #174
I keep seeing that one coming down the pipe enki23 Sep 2014 #134
The populous in it's wisdom demands it. Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #148
I say "Wreck Havoc" to my wife, because it pisses her off. grattsl Sep 2014 #7
I could care less. missingthebigdog Sep 2014 #8
Me too. TDale313 Sep 2014 #17
LOL, grammar police are so annoying at times. nt Logical Sep 2014 #13
Only between 12:00a and 11:59p. reflection Sep 2014 #104
Your right. johnp3907 Sep 2014 #14
It might jibe, though, begging your pedant. elias49 Sep 2014 #22
I have a really pretty opal pedant leftieNanner Sep 2014 #33
I see we have something in common pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #15
I knew catchnrelease Sep 2014 #29
It's a mute point. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #16
One of my favorites! Scuba Sep 2014 #20
In that case, let's hear no more of it. merrily Sep 2014 #129
Thank you! treestar Sep 2014 #18
I see that allot. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2014 #19
Was that typo on purpose? Unknown Beatle Sep 2014 #32
That would be a good guess. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2014 #105
So what you were seeing was an allotment or distribution. sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #116
Grammar. . . Gramma littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #21
Until predictive text kicks in. elias49 Sep 2014 #23
And proofreading checks out. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #24
Indeed, littlemisssmartypants! elias49 Sep 2014 #28
Hold up there... Snarkoleptic Sep 2014 #25
I keep a running text file.. X_Digger Sep 2014 #26
Really? Wow, odd. Nt Logical Sep 2014 #30
The George W. Bush Unknown Beatle Sep 2014 #37
Thanks for the come pendulum. JEB Sep 2014 #38
Clever basturd. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #56
You're missing "needs fixed" Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #39
That's just a difference in dialect, right? Not misuse. Unvanguard Sep 2014 #91
It is grammatically incorrect. Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #96
It is grammatically incorrect in "standard English." Unvanguard Sep 2014 #183
Then the entire list should be dumped on the same basis. n/t Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #205
Not so. Most of them are misheard common phrases. Unvanguard Sep 2014 #211
We'll just have to disagree. n/t Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #212
As a native Pittsburgh child... DeadLetterOffice Sep 2014 #193
The interesting thing is that I first encountered it Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #204
It's pretty much only the western half of the state. DeadLetterOffice Sep 2014 #220
My boss was from about halfway between Pittsburgh & Johnstown. Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #221
Well Played, X Digger. Maynar Sep 2014 #46
Great list, but one has me laughing out loud Not Sure Sep 2014 #47
I've used the phrase "pre-Madonna prima donna" ... eppur_se_muova Sep 2014 #181
This message was self-deleted by its author eppur_se_muova Sep 2014 #182
***** radiclib Sep 2014 #63
I think you forgot "pore/pour" kath Sep 2014 #72
Oh, yes. That one makes me gag. I see it all the time. nt Nay Sep 2014 #122
NB re "vise/vice" Spider Jerusalem Sep 2014 #76
The whole -ate thing drives me bonkers.. X_Digger Sep 2014 #89
Sorry to be that guy but can't let that slide whatthehey Sep 2014 #109
"Different to" is common and frequently used in British English Spider Jerusalem Sep 2014 #188
Not in current style manuals it isn't whatthehey Sep 2014 #223
The Telegraph is probably not the place to be looking, they're hardly going to be innovative. Spider Jerusalem Sep 2014 #229
You are citing a dictionary whatthehey Sep 2014 #247
Missed out desert/dessert intaglio Sep 2014 #82
you missed one.... marshal/martial justabob Sep 2014 #90
Pre-madonna treestar Sep 2014 #98
That's an awesome hobby. I build boats. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2014 #110
beyond the pail, on the lamb , A new leash on life snagglepuss Sep 2014 #111
"We are so screwn" deutsey Sep 2014 #113
But "butt" naked seems so appropriate.... Whiskeytide Sep 2014 #114
I knew we could count on you to bemoon that one pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #119
Is that your hobby? How much time do you devote to it? upaloopa Sep 2014 #131
No time, just have a file on my desktop that I add to when I see particularly egregious examples. nt X_Digger Sep 2014 #190
I plan to go through... 3catwoman3 Sep 2014 #208
I always have to think twice with... 3catwoman3 Sep 2014 #222
Another one not on your list- breath/breathe kath Sep 2014 #246
uh no...epic fail VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #27
"wreak" and "havoc" are separate words radiclib Sep 2014 #65
it says right there is is an "idiom" and in the dictionary.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #233
"two words together never have a meaning" radiclib Sep 2014 #238
I believe you THOUGHT you took me too the woodshed with this quote... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #239
Oh, you're right! They're really one word. radiclib Sep 2014 #241
yes you are definitely confused... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #242
Sorry you missed the sarcasm radiclib Sep 2014 #243
Did you ask about "wreck" when you thought you "schooled" me? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #244
Popsicle headache. You win. radiclib Sep 2014 #245
I believe the modern idiom is "f--- up." hunter Sep 2014 #115
Yes that may be so....but it doesn't negate the first usage.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #234
Wreaked is past tense? Mariana Sep 2014 #158
depends on whether it is used as a verb or not. VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #235
I know a dog named Havoc that occasionly reeks. JEB Sep 2014 #35
Some of my favorites: OldRedneck Sep 2014 #36
Wow, I've used "nauseous" incorrectly all this time. reflection Sep 2014 #106
You didn't know my grandma. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2014 #112
We dreaded going to my grandma's house. hunter Sep 2014 #117
I pacifically asked for an expresso... progressoid Sep 2014 #40
That was hilarious! Old Crow Sep 2014 #42
OK, but you should never end a paragraph with a "bang-head". n/t IDemo Sep 2014 #41
Its hard to essentially keep up with grammarly errors. Gormy Cuss Sep 2014 #43
Don't give up. English is worth saving. navarth Sep 2014 #44
And fuck the fucking spelling nazis ! upaloopa Sep 2014 #135
Since you spelled everything correctly in your post, navarth Sep 2014 #149
That gave me the best laugh all day and upaloopa Sep 2014 #157
Ha! navarth Sep 2014 #166
How About All Those Executive Types Saying "VIR-bij" . . . cer7711 Sep 2014 #45
Okay, just please don't go nucular on us pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #49
You bother because you care about the language. bvf Sep 2014 #48
Apparently the poster does. lonestarnot Sep 2014 #51
Which poster? littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #69
Oper. lonestarnot Sep 2014 #207
People also need to learn the difference between "affect" and "effect" Spider Jerusalem Sep 2014 #52
Unless you have a certain "affect" such as schzoid. nt Laffy Kat Sep 2014 #60
I imply what you inferred there. OilemFirchen Sep 2014 #99
I hate "gift" as a verb. cwydro Sep 2014 #237
That's right.. it's "wreak havoc".. thanks for the good ol Enlish Language reminder, radiclib Cha Sep 2014 #53
Apparently a very successful thread! bvf Sep 2014 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger Sep 2014 #55
Careful littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #71
Tell us how you really feel. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #57
Everyone is going to wreak corrections upon you. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #58
Let's not forget that there is no "Democrat Party"! The Wielding Truth Sep 2014 #59
"noone" area51 Sep 2014 #61
Somethin' tells me you're into somethin' good klook Sep 2014 #177
AHHHHGH! 2naSalit Sep 2014 #67
I was raised pronouncing it that way. My community pronounced it that way. Luminous Animal Sep 2014 #199
The terrible butchering of the language - I just can't bare it! kath Sep 2014 #70
Be careful when you play with words. littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #74
These are the threads I live for on DU. littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #73
Thank you! That one drives me nuts. WhiteAndNerdy Sep 2014 #75
I think my insurance company covers Havoc Replacement. Lint Head Sep 2014 #78
Writing for a college newspaper, I once typed 'respectfully' when I meant 'respectively' pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #79
"Wreck Havoc, and Let Slip the Dogs of Grammar!" nt daredtowork Sep 2014 #80
Et two? WinkyDink Sep 2014 #87
Dogs of Usage. merrily Sep 2014 #130
I get frustrated by how often I see "wretch" when the person means "retch," tblue37 Sep 2014 #81
I'm racking my brain but I can't think of a single example of that pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #83
It's "rack one's brains", not "wrack" Spider Jerusalem Sep 2014 #92
Experts seem to be divided on this pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #120
No, they really aren't Spider Jerusalem Sep 2014 #187
Another option would be to appreciate and value the qualities of other people Alkene Sep 2014 #84
Like you are doing, right? tkmorris Sep 2014 #125
If only people would tow the line. Starry Messenger Sep 2014 #85
It's a doggy-dog world. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #86
!. Laughing laughing! Luminous Animal Sep 2014 #200
Your post doesn't pass mustard. wyldwolf Sep 2014 #88
Irregardless and for all intensive purposes, I say that it is. nt Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #93
Oh sure you think, your so smart. You probably the type to reply to any old gammer, eror. Rex Sep 2014 #94
I gnu that. I just wanted to be post #95 on a grammar post. LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #95
I get hung up on hang or hung justiceischeap Sep 2014 #97
Dude, for all intensive purposes, your totally loosing it hear! Zorra Sep 2014 #100
I have no ideal what you're talking about. reflection Sep 2014 #101
Preach it! Iggo Sep 2014 #102
Excuse me, but I am no SPUD.... ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #103
Question: reflection Sep 2014 #108
Whinge, bespoke, aggro, anorak, bollocks, bloody, coriander, bum, aubergine, dodgy, knackered.. X_Digger Sep 2014 #202
thank you reflection Sep 2014 #219
I know. I know. The stuff I've seen, even on a site like this where I Nay Sep 2014 #118
I always say; "Nowadays everyone writes but no one reads." johnp3907 Sep 2014 #154
It used to be a thing -- wreck meant wreak until that usage began to die in the 19th century fishwax Sep 2014 #121
One might also "weck havoc" -- make a sandwich of it on a salted roll with caraway seeds fishwax Sep 2014 #123
I like it. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #160
The last time we went out to dinner, I had a havoc sandwich at a seafood restaurant. George II Sep 2014 #225
While we are at it... Glassunion Sep 2014 #124
that *is* how it's pronounced south of the 39th parallel (and E of Texas) MisterP Sep 2014 #126
With just a hint of "rake." merrily Sep 2014 #132
I don't understand spelling and grammar police. upaloopa Sep 2014 #128
I agree. Some things still merrily Sep 2014 #136
If I can't understand what you are saying I pass it by. upaloopa Sep 2014 #137
I meant in a real life conversation with someone, where it might be more merrily Sep 2014 #138
I learned a long time ago that if we upaloopa Sep 2014 #141
I don't see anyone here going out to "hunt down" people pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #139
I do. Hissyspit Sep 2014 #140
This is not class upaloopa Sep 2014 #143
Not really the point. Hissyspit Sep 2014 #146
I used to teach for a living, but DU is not a classroom. Correcting adults in a classroom is merrily Sep 2014 #144
Humans are social. They learn from each other all the time in all kinds of ways. Hissyspit Sep 2014 #147
That is a different point entirely. merrily Sep 2014 #150
Uh...Who are you calling a "spud"? Blue_Tires Sep 2014 #151
Prescriptionists are fated to lose in the long run. trackfan Sep 2014 #152
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2014 #153
I could care less sammythecat Sep 2014 #155
Wow. 70 wrecks for this post thus far. reflection Sep 2014 #156
LOL! merrily Sep 2014 #159
And this thread in particulates littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #162
I prefer what upaloopa's reply taught. merrily Sep 2014 #163
Indeed, and neither you nor I are spuds. littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #164
aw you are an easy person to be friendly to. Pure pleasure to encounter merrily Sep 2014 #165
And a high velocity crash as well littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #161
Send me a PM if you want me to listen up to something taterguy Sep 2014 #167
What took you so long. We've been covering for you for hours. littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #168
Thank you and never stop correcting Oilwellian Sep 2014 #169
Well. Oil. Deep subjects. littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #171
Up and Adam! chrisa Sep 2014 #170
But but but Wreck havoc has such a dramatic impact Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #172
I had a heated discussion with someone over veranda rights gwheezie Sep 2014 #173
So true....and a few others: George II Sep 2014 #175
Yes! progdog Sep 2014 #180
It appears that you have a problem with what is primarily African American vernacular. Zorra Sep 2014 #213
It appears you have a problem with making sweeping, uninformed, and incorrect assumptions.... George II Sep 2014 #224
"Sometimes I Don't Speak Right... But Yet I Know What I'm Talking About" - WAR WillyT Sep 2014 #176
sea mantics Billy Budd Sep 2014 #184
Pronounced "reek". albino65 Sep 2014 #185
wreck kardonb Sep 2014 #189
Wow, I should of knowed that. Don't loose faith. People like me still write good. Vattel Sep 2014 #194
where did you get the idea it meant to eliminate? niyad Sep 2014 #195
Oh, good grief! radiclib Sep 2014 #203
I did. the definition does not mean "to eliminate". niyad Sep 2014 #236
No shit! radiclib Sep 2014 #240
Kick and wreck. nt eppur_se_muova Sep 2014 #206
I am unhappy and itchy renate Sep 2014 #218
Moran brainiac version: Reek havoc valerief Sep 2014 #226
so many posters here cwydro Sep 2014 #227
"Mute point" YarnAddict Sep 2014 #228
There was a big prison ek-scape yesterday. Kingofalldems Sep 2014 #231
Thanks kaikevin Mar 2015 #248
 

MrModerate

(9,753 posts)
62. Punctuation inside or outside of quotes . . .
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:47 AM
Sep 2014

Is a convention, not a rule.

I happen to follow the convention that punctuation goes inside quotes unless the quoted material has its own punctuation or to do so would be confusing.

But that doesn't make the OP wrong.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
107. No, it's pretty much a rule.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:35 AM
Sep 2014

Punctuation always goes inside quotes. Very few exceptions to the rule...er, convention.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
133. The New York Times Style Book said it goes inside and the NYT was so respected then that
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:11 PM
Sep 2014

it just about did become a rule, as you say.

I don't know if it made into school texts, though.

SunSeeker

(51,564 posts)
186. No, only commas and periods are always inside the quotation marks.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 08:03 PM
Sep 2014

Other punctuation marks are inside the quotation marks only if they are part of the original text.

And yes, it is a rule, at least it is in federal Bluebook and the California Style Manual for legal writing.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
192. an example?
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:31 PM
Sep 2014

1. Are you aware that some punctuators are confused about "quotation marks"?

2. He asked, "Should there be a period at the end of this sentence?". <---?

SunSeeker

(51,564 posts)
197. Example 1 is correct. Example 2 should not have a period after the quote.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:46 PM
Sep 2014

More examples:

Was the defendant heard to say, "I confess"?

The officer shouted, "Halt!"

SunSeeker

(51,564 posts)
230. Was the defendant heard to say, "I confess!"?
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 01:20 PM
Sep 2014

The general rule is you don't double up concluding punctuation marks, but I imagine an exception is made when the concluding punctuation mark within the quote left alone does not reflect the meaning of the sentence. I tried to find the rule for that and couldn't. I suspect that you would need to add a question mark, even though you already have what would otherwise be a concluding punctuation mark in the form of an exclamation point, since without the question mark the sentence would appear to be a declaratory sentence rather than a question.

I imagine most writers avoid this conundrum by just deleting the exclamation point.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
210. It is a rule, but it always looks very odd for a list of things in quotes:
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 01:07 AM
Sep 2014

Did she say, "yes," "no," or "maybe"?

demigoddess

(6,641 posts)
217. it is this way
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 03:33 AM
Sep 2014

Did she say "yes", "no", or "maybe"?
or it could be

Did she say "yes!", "no!", or "maybe"?

the commas are not required in the last two such as

democrats, republicans and independents. can also be
democrats, republicans, and independents.

either one is correct.

 

MrModerate

(9,753 posts)
215. "Pretty much" is not very precise.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 03:02 AM
Sep 2014

And while I haven't looked in my old copies of Chicago Manual of Style, memory tells me that they favored punctuation outside quotes. Certainly my Macquarie Dictionary and style guide (Australia) prefers it that way (calling it the "English" system).

That makes it a convention and not a rule in my book.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
127. Correct. That's a pet peeve of mine, too. I know the correct way, as you show, but
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:01 PM
Sep 2014

so many people write it incorrectly I'm not sure if the rule is changing.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
201. I hate it when that happens.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:10 PM
Sep 2014

For example, so many people use "fulsome" as a synonym for "extensive" (rather than in its correct meaning of extravagant, overdone, offensive to good taste) that it's coming into acceptance for its incorrect usage.

"Doubt" went through the same history, having originally meant to suspect, while "misdoubt" meant something closer to the modern "doubt."

Warpy

(111,268 posts)
6. Pedant.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 10:28 PM
Sep 2014

However, yes, that one drives me nuts, too, along with "reigning in" something or someone, so I'll join you in wearing the pedant's cap.

It's REINING in.

It's time to rein in our militarized police before they wreak more havoc upon innocent civilians.

Warpy

(111,268 posts)
64. Or in the head of the poster
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:03 AM
Sep 2014

I don't know why, but they all seem to laboriously type in "reigning."

My mother used to cringe and whimper at "irregardless" and "consensus of opinion," both corporatespeak that my dad picked up and I was convinced he used when he was home solely to drive her around the bend.

 

grattsl

(63 posts)
7. I say "Wreck Havoc" to my wife, because it pisses her off.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 10:29 PM
Sep 2014

It is great fun in my world. I love getting her excited. Making up is the best. Until next time, have fun and ...

Wreck havoc!!!

reflection

(6,286 posts)
104. Only between 12:00a and 11:59p.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:30 AM
Sep 2014

No actually, I have a weird Rain Man ability to spot a typo in a wall of text immediately. That being said, now I'm sure I have made a typo somewhere recently that will contradict this assertion.

leftieNanner

(15,115 posts)
33. I have a really pretty opal pedant
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:16 PM
Sep 2014

oh wait....

I'm sorry, this is just too much fun. Needed some laughs tonight.

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
32. Was that typo on purpose?
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:15 PM
Sep 2014

Alot? There's no such word as alot. It took a lot for me to write this.

I guess you were being facetious, right?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
105. That would be a good guess.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:32 AM
Sep 2014

But actually there is such a word as allot, it means "to allocate or distribute". i.e. "allotment"

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
26. I keep a running text file..
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:04 PM
Sep 2014

They could barely make mince meat
Low self of steam (Low self-esteem)
Whoa is me (Woe)
He’s in tensive care
Escape goat (Scape)
use to
ad homonym (hominem)
I could care less
Tow the line (toe)
Taken for granite
A mute point (moot)
I did a complete 360 on the issue (180)
Baited breath (bated is correct, but it's common usage)
Chomping at the bit (champing is the correct word, but it's in common usage now)
as a pose to
In one foul swoop (fell)
Butt naked (buck)
Pre-madonna (prima donna)
excedra
expresso
living in squabble (squalor)
supposably
Irregardless (regardless)
Pacifically
vice (-like) grip (Vise)
rediculous
Walla (voilà)
raised to the ground (razed)
Administrate (administer)
Orientate (orient)
try and (try to)
all of the sudden
spaded (spayed)
murial (mural)
Certificated (certify)
Deep seeded (seated)
Could of/ should of/ would of
A new leash on life (lease)
alot
well-healed (heeled)
anyways
down the pipe (down the pike)
libary
beckon call
Febuary
for all intensive purposes
prostrate (prostate)
low and behold (lo)
awhile
contex
conjunctionitis
"up on" instead of "upon"
beyond the pail (pale)
less we forget/unless we forget/least we forget (lest)
per say (se)
alterior motive
Here, here! (hear)
I should have did that
I should've went
Doggy Dog (dog eat dog)
card shark (cardsharp)
blessing in the sky (blessing in disguise)
rod/rot iron (wrought)
rain of terror (reign)
shined instead of shone
Another thing coming (think)
Point of you
tender hooks
contra section
conversate
hisself
noone
fixin' to
exscape
hew and cry
heart-wrenching instead of heart-rending (or worse, heart-rendering)
full proof
"to pay in the rear" instead of "to pay in arrears"
on accident (as a parallel construct to 'on purpose')
world wind (whirlwind)
snuck
hard road to hoe (row to hoe)
cut to the chase (cut through the chafe) *also in common usage now
griss for the mill (grist)
begs the question (misused, not 'wrong')
cut the mustard (muster) *also in common usage
went missing (disappeared)
sneaking suspicion (sinking)
Different than (from)
ice tea (iced)
iced cream (ice)
reign in
epitomy
gotten
flack (flak)
lynchpin
Send in the calvary!
on guard (engargde / en garde)
based off of (based on)
if and when
unless and until
obligated (obliged)
Nauseous (nauseated)
anchors away (aweigh)
meteoric rise (meteors fall)
commander and chief
Free reign
bold faced lie (bald or bare)
almost exactly
drownded
Running the Gauntlet (Gantlet) * common usage these days
Marshall law (martial)
flaunt the law (flout)
between you and I
on the lamb (lam)
in tact
pack (pact)
vocal chords (cords)
the gig is up
nip it in the butt (bud)
one in the same (one and the same)
Statue of limitations (statute)
Extract revenge (exact)
Momento (memento)
Scotch free / scott free (scot)
Hone in on (home)
Feeble position (fetal)
Giving some leadway (leeway)
without further à deux


or confuse these for each other:
Decimate / obliterate
Flounder / founder
Disinterested / uninterested
Loose / lose
dilemma / quandary
to / too
Affect / Effect
weary / wary
marquis / marquee
bawling / balling
piqued / peeked / peaked
eminent / imminent
bearing / baring / barring
flair / flare
exuberant / exorbitant
lay / lie / laid / lain
discrete / discreet
its / it's
there / they're / their
your / you're
oral / verbal
Statute / Statue
threw / though
seen / scene
capitol / capital
goat / goad
good / well
sell / sale
site / sight
faze / phase
tenant / tenet
then / than
jibe / jive
less / fewer
ideal / idea
whenever / when
myriad / many
shined / shone
invite / invitation
moral / morale
weak / reek
brake / break
peddle / pedal
seen / saw
seen / scene
Conscious / conscience
succeed / Secede
imply / infer
drug / dragged
dissent / descent / decent
sleighs / slays
born / borne
compliment / complement
over / more (we've been in business for over 50 years / we've been in business for more than 50 years)
dribble / drivel
diffuse / defuse


redundancy:
Over-exaggerate
Hot Water Heater
PIN number
PC Computer
ATM machine
HIV virus
very unique
the hoi polloi
Fleeting glimpse
extol praise
frozen tundra
tuna fish
with au jus
Free Gift
Added Bonus
"in the process of"
Chai tea ('chai' is Hindi for 'tea')

using an adjective instead of an adverb:
"Drive Safe" instead of "Drive Safely"
"you got here quick"
"Don't take it personal."

penultimate - does NOT mean "the last", but the one before the last.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
39. You're missing "needs fixed"
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:26 PM
Sep 2014

Or any other similarly constructed phrase.

(And everyone from PA, creeping into NE Ohio, is going ?

But very impressive list.

Unvanguard

(4,588 posts)
91. That's just a difference in dialect, right? Not misuse.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:14 AM
Sep 2014

The entries on the list are (predominantly) cases where idioms and common phrases are gotten slightly wrong in ways that render them nonsensical. There's nothing wrong with "needs fixed" if that's the language in the place where you live.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
96. It is grammatically incorrect.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:50 AM
Sep 2014

Here's an explanation of the other variation of the construction "needs fixing"

For example, only one of the following sentences is correct. Which one?

I dislike working late. (???)
I dislike to work late. (???)

When to use the infinitive

The infinitive form is used after certain verbs:
- forget, help, learn, teach, train
- choose, expect, hope, need, offer, want, would like
- agree, encourage, pretend, promise
- allow, can/can't afford, decide, manage, mean, refuse

I forgot to close the window.
Mary needs to leave early.
Why are they encouraged to learn English?
We can't afford to take a long holiday.


https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-m_infinitive-ing.htm

The phrase is missing the to + infinitive "to be." The correct construction would be "needs to be fixed"

There are discussions which describe it as a dialect - so I might place it in the list with the way baited breath and chomping at the bit are: needs fixed (needs to be fixed is correct, but it's local dialect for some)

Unvanguard

(4,588 posts)
183. It is grammatically incorrect in "standard English."
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 07:25 PM
Sep 2014

It is grammatically correct in other dialects of English (one in particular). I'm familiar with the rule you reference, but rules of grammar are not universal objective laws that exist outside of actual usage. There's no reason to stigmatize it as "incorrect" in colloquial usage (like on DU).

Unvanguard

(4,588 posts)
211. Not so. Most of them are misheard common phrases.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 01:16 AM
Sep 2014

That has nothing to do with dialect, it has to do with preserving the connection between the meanings of phrases and the meanings of the words that make them up. That strikes me as worthier than indoctrinating everyone in one particular kind of English's (often artificial) rules of grammar. Though there's plenty of complaints about alleged word misuse that I think are similarly misconceived, like the objections to the figurative use of "literally" (which is an old and well-established alternative usage of the word, and a natural evolution from its non-figurative meaning).

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
193. As a native Pittsburgh child...
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:54 PM
Sep 2014

... raised by eastern Ohio hill farmers, I have absolutely NO idea what you're talking about. Nope. No idea at all.

(Spouse has always said that if I were Shakespeare, Hamlet would have just said "or not." Our first apartment was #2B. Spouse laughed his ass off about that.)

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
204. The interesting thing is that I first encountered it
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 12:01 AM
Sep 2014

teaching in an inner city 99.9% black school - so for years I thought it was an ethnic dialect. Until I worked later for a very well educated white boss who also used it and finally figured out the PA connection.

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
220. It's pretty much only the western half of the state.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 07:22 AM
Sep 2014

People in Philadelphia generally have "to be" as part of their everyday vocabulary.

Not Sure

(735 posts)
47. Great list, but one has me laughing out loud
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:12 AM
Sep 2014
pre-Madonna

Brilliant!

Thank you, whoever came up with that one.

Response to eppur_se_muova (Reply #181)

kath

(10,565 posts)
72. I think you forgot "pore/pour"
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:40 AM
Sep 2014

Things like "she spent the evening pouring over the documents" drive me insane.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
76. NB re "vise/vice"
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:51 AM
Sep 2014

It's "vice" in British English:

vice, n.2


5. A tool composed of two jaws, opened and closed by means of a screw, which firmly grip and hold a piece of work in position while it is being filed, sawn, or otherwise operated upon; used especially by workers in metal or carpenters. Cf. hand-vice.
   The spelling vise is now usual only in U.S.


It's also more commonly "orientate" in British English than "orient". And it's also usually "different to" and not "different than".

"Shined" instead of "shone" makes me grit my teeth, though (I've even seen it in the New York Times; do people have something against irregular verbs?)
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
188. "Different to" is common and frequently used in British English
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 08:27 PM
Sep 2014

And is in fact the original form of the phrase:

When we consult the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) for the broader historical picture, we find that different to predates other phrases, being evidenced from the 16th century; different from is first recorded in Shakespeare’s Comedy of Errors; different than also first appears in writing in the 17th century.

http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2014/01/different-from-than-to/

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
223. Not in current style manuals it isn't
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 10:03 AM
Sep 2014
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/about-us/style-book/1435310/Telegraph-style-book-Dd.html

Lots of things are archaic and/or common without being technically correct. Even in educated circles. For example I've never known anyone, even the most dedicated grammar nerd, get the fewer/less contrast precisely right. Yes it's really 10 items or fewer, but if I have 11 (incidentally whether that should be "eleven" or not depends on whether it's a book or a newspaper style you prefer) and pedantically decide to cast one aside, do I now have one fewer or one less item? Answers on a postcard. ...

There IS a case where different than is technically correct. If the comparison is a clause that has a stated or implied "have" or "do" verb.

John has a different hairstyle than I (have).

Steve does different chores than George (does).

But straight comparisons are different from.

Now of course these kinds of technicalities are fun to discuss when the topic comes up, but in real life I couldn't care less. Well not often. Using adjectives as adverbs bugs me for some reason.

But that's different than caring about 10 items or fewer. I'll try and remember that.





 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
229. The Telegraph is probably not the place to be looking, they're hardly going to be innovative.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 11:06 AM
Sep 2014

They still use asterisks rather than spell out "bloody", for instance.

In current British English, different is followed more or less equally by 'from' or 'to'• • He was, in fact, totally different from Keith • James looked very different from the last time she had seen him • This is very different to the ideal situation • The next day was Christmas Eve, but it was no different to any other day except that the shop was very, very busy.

Note that the verb differ is never followed by 'to'.

In American English, but much less in British English, different is commonly followed by 'than', especially when a clause follows• AmE • It was all very different than they had imagined BrE • It was all very different from / to what they had imagined.

RECOMMENDATION: use different from or different to; avoid different than, which is common in American English.

http://www.chambers.co.uk/search.php?query=differently&title=21st

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
247. You are citing a dictionary
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 11:38 AM
Sep 2014

Dictionaries cite usages, correct or otherwise.

From your same source

http://www.chambers.co.uk/search.php?query=ain%27t&title=21st


I'm not of the opinion that innovation is necessarily desirable. I'm well aware that descriptive linguistics is a valid discipline tracking changes in actual language use, but that doesn't make it the final resource for correct language use. There is a reason reputable news and publishing companies have style manuals and don't just tell editors to use dictionaries.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
82. Missed out desert/dessert
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 03:47 AM
Sep 2014

Obviously eating desert is difficult but "The enemy called for our troops to dessert," takes the trifle

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
113. "We are so screwn"
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:44 AM
Sep 2014

That's my favorite Freeperism.

Of course, this classic is near and dear to my funny bone:

?w=330


Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
114. But "butt" naked seems so appropriate....
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:06 AM
Sep 2014

That phrase always reminds me of the old Jerry Clower routine:

The nurse told me to get undressed, and I asked "buck" nekkid?

She looked at me over her glasses and said "is there a difference between naked and buck naked?"

I said "yes ma'am. You can be nekkid and still have your socks on."

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
190. No time, just have a file on my desktop that I add to when I see particularly egregious examples. nt
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:09 PM
Sep 2014

3catwoman3

(24,006 posts)
208. I plan to go through...
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 12:28 AM
Sep 2014

...your delightful list item by item. Seeing as I have not yet done that, I don't know if it contains one of the latest egregious grammar offenses - making a possessive out of "I". When I hear things like, "John and I's vacation, I want to scream .

3catwoman3

(24,006 posts)
222. I always have to think twice with...
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 08:56 AM
Sep 2014

...denier, as in "climate change denier," because I learned it as a term referring to the gauge/fineness of a knit product, most commonly used when referring to the sheerness of hosiery.

kath

(10,565 posts)
246. Another one not on your list- breath/breathe
Sat Sep 6, 2014, 04:18 PM
Sep 2014

i see that one almost as much as the lose/loose confusion.

And then there's "dinning room" for dining room.

ARGGGGHHH.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
27. uh no...epic fail
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:11 PM
Sep 2014

wreak havoc (with something)
to cause a lot of trouble with something; to ruin or damage something. Your bad attitude will wreak havoc with my project. The rainy weather wreaked havoc with our picnic plans.
See also: havoc, wreak

http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/wreak+havoc

radiclib

(1,811 posts)
65. "wreak" and "havoc" are separate words
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:03 AM
Sep 2014

Your definition requires both words. Why do I need to explain this?
Epic fail indeed. Back to school with you!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
233. it says right there is is an "idiom" and in the dictionary....
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 06:34 PM
Sep 2014

no back to school with YOU!

two words together never have a meaning? ARE you serious?

radiclib

(1,811 posts)
238. "two words together never have a meaning"
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 07:34 PM
Sep 2014

Who ever said that? And your dictionary defined "idiom" does not include the word "wreck". Unless it was written by idiots.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
239. I believe you THOUGHT you took me too the woodshed with this quote...
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 07:36 PM
Sep 2014
"wreak" and "havoc" are separate words

did you not?

radiclib

(1,811 posts)
241. Oh, you're right! They're really one word.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 07:41 PM
Sep 2014

"Wreakhavoc". But why is there a space in the middle? And is it a noun, or an adjective? I'm confused..

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
242. yes you are definitely confused...
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 07:42 PM
Sep 2014
"wreak" and "havoc" are separate words

Your definition requires both words. Why do I need to explain this?

radiclib

(1,811 posts)
243. Sorry you missed the sarcasm
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 07:52 PM
Sep 2014

I didn't want to insult you with the "thingie". I sincerely do not understand where you're coming from. Do you think "wreck" is the same as "wreak"? I DO NOT want to be snarky, but are you dyslexic?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
244. Did you ask about "wreck" when you thought you "schooled" me?
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 07:53 PM
Sep 2014

no you didn't....you were speaking about wreak....

radiclib

(1,811 posts)
245. Popsicle headache. You win.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 08:00 PM
Sep 2014

I'm just sorry that I'll never know what the fuck your problem with the OP was to begin with. Epic fail indeed.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
115. I believe the modern idiom is "f--- up."
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:26 AM
Sep 2014
Your bad attitude will f--- up my project.

The rainy weather f---ed up our picnic plans.

Mariana

(14,858 posts)
158. Wreaked is past tense?
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 04:48 PM
Sep 2014

I learned the past tense of wreak is wrought.

The rainy weather wrought havoc with our picnic plans.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
235. depends on whether it is used as a verb or not.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 06:36 PM
Sep 2014

wreak
[reek] Spell Syllables
Synonyms Examples Word Origin
verb (used with object)
1.
to inflict or execute (punishment, vengeance, etc.):
They wreaked havoc on the enemy.
2.
to carry out the promptings of (one's rage, ill humor, will, desire, etc.), as on a victim or object:
He wreaked his anger on the office staff.


...
Synonyms Expand
1. visit, vent, unleash.

....

...
Word Origin
Old English wrecan; related to Old Frisian wreka, Old High German rehhan (German rächen), Old Norse reka, Latin urgēre to push
....

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/wreaked

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
36. Some of my favorites:
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:23 PM
Sep 2014

"Nauseous" when you mean "nauseated."

"The sight of that makes me nauseous." No, it doesn't. It makes you NAUSEATED. If you say "The sight of that makes me nauseous," you are saying that the sight of something makes you cause other people to be nauseated.



"Anxious" when you mean "eager."

"We were anxious to get to grandma's house." No, you were "eager" to get to grandma's.
"Anxious" means you are looking forward to something and you are concerned it will be bad. "Eager" means you are looking forward to what you expect will be a joyful event.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
117. We dreaded going to my grandma's house.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:37 AM
Sep 2014

So did the police.

I inherited my berserker genes from her.

Fortunately these are kept in check by the depression genes I inherited from my grandfathers.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
43. Its hard to essentially keep up with grammarly errors.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:45 PM
Sep 2014

(I hope that subject line was like fingernails on a chalkboard.)

navarth

(5,927 posts)
44. Don't give up. English is worth saving.
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:46 PM
Sep 2014

You'll get plenty of ignoramuses calling you a 'spelling nazi', etc. Fuck 'em.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
157. That gave me the best laugh all day and
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 04:48 PM
Sep 2014

my wife said a real funny thing this morning.
I told her when I am retired (she will still be working) I'll text her when I make a real great golf shot. She said and I'll text "is the laundry done?"

cer7711

(502 posts)
45. How About All Those Executive Types Saying "VIR-bij" . . .
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 11:58 PM
Sep 2014

. . . instead of "VIR-bee-ij" when mispronouncing the three-syllable word "verbiage"?

Drives me fucking crazy! "We've got to get the VIR-bij right on this," they'll say while I think to myself, "What, you only care about getting the verbs right in this document?!"



 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
52. People also need to learn the difference between "affect" and "effect"
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:19 AM
Sep 2014

If something has an effect on you, you are affected by it. (People also need to stop using "impact" as a verb because they don't know the difference between "affect" and "effect&quot .

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
54. Apparently a very successful thread!
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:21 AM
Sep 2014

Bookmarked for a leisurely read tomorrow.

Thanks, radiclib!

Response to radiclib (Original post)

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
199. I was raised pronouncing it that way. My community pronounced it that way.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:04 PM
Sep 2014

I never heard it pronounced any other way by any person be it neighbor or educator.

It wasn't until I moved to Los Angeles at age 20 and became involved with an anti-nuke organization that I heard it pronounced correctly. (And I was lightly mocked for pronouncing it incorrectly.)

Being a stutterer... regularly as a child, intermittently as an adult, it was a very difficult pronunciation hurdle for me to overcome. I'd panic every time I had to say it and often found myself stuck on the 'k" sound.

Thirty five years later, I've pert near overcome it but every once in a while I find my brain still directs me to mispronounce it and thus, I employ a tactic that my speech therapist taught me to deal with my stuttering. Slow down and imagine saying the word before you say it.

And even then, at times, it does not work so I excuse myself to go to the bathroom.

littlemissmartypants

(22,691 posts)
73. These are the threads I live for on DU.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:40 AM
Sep 2014

They firmly plant us on one side or the other to lie with each other.

WhiteAndNerdy

(365 posts)
75. Thank you! That one drives me nuts.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:47 AM
Sep 2014

Another one I can't stand is when people write "formally" when they mean "formerly." I've seen people write that they were "formally known as X" where "X" was a previous screen name that could not possibly be their formal name.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
79. Writing for a college newspaper, I once typed 'respectfully' when I meant 'respectively'
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:57 AM
Sep 2014

I KNEW the difference, but writing on deadline it just accidentally came out that way. Our student copyreading/editing class missed it and my mistake was published on the front page of the USC Daily Trojan.

That was 40 years ago and I've been doing penants ever since.

tblue37

(65,394 posts)
81. I get frustrated by how often I see "wretch" when the person means "retch,"
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 03:39 AM
Sep 2014

as in "That makes me wretch <sic>."

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
120. Experts seem to be divided on this
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:46 PM
Sep 2014

And some say the two words are now interchangeable in this context. No matter which word you use, you're likely to get an argument.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
187. No, they really aren't
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 08:19 PM
Sep 2014

the etymology is definitely from the rack, the medieval torture instrument. "Wrack" means "wreck or devastation".

Alkene

(752 posts)
84. Another option would be to appreciate and value the qualities of other people
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 06:04 AM
Sep 2014

without being a self-righteous, judgmental prig.

reflection

(6,286 posts)
101. I have no ideal what you're talking about.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:21 AM
Sep 2014

And I don't except your premise. I think this post was merely to illicit a bad response.

reflection

(6,286 posts)
108. Question:
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:38 AM
Sep 2014

In the past couple of years I've seen the word 'whinge' show up in lieu of 'whine.' I realize the word is correct and has merit, but why did it suddenly burst on the scene so quickly? Or has it been used a lot and I just missed it?

My gut tells me with the advent of global communication, all of these subtle English differences between cultures bleed into our vocabularies, either consciously or subconsciously. But that's just a hunch.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
202. Whinge, bespoke, aggro, anorak, bollocks, bloody, coriander, bum, aubergine, dodgy, knackered..
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:25 PM
Sep 2014

All UK English. Cable TV & the internet have made a muddle of english-speaking cultures.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
118. I know. I know. The stuff I've seen, even on a site like this where I
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:34 PM
Sep 2014

expect a modicum of grammatical ability, makes me want to kill myself. I also will say that over the 10 years I have been on DU, grammatical ability has dropped even lower. It's quite obvious that no one reads edited material (like books) any more, so they don't learn the correct spelling of the words they hear, as in your example. Everyone is learning grammar, spelling, and usage from the Internet. Deadly.

johnp3907

(3,731 posts)
154. I always say; "Nowadays everyone writes but no one reads."
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 04:37 PM
Sep 2014

(And now I hate myself because I'm wondering if "nowadays" is a real word!)

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
123. One might also "weck havoc" -- make a sandwich of it on a salted roll with caraway seeds
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:00 PM
Sep 2014

mmm ... havoc on weck

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
124. While we are at it...
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:13 PM
Sep 2014

It's a "moot point" not a "mute point".
"French benefits" do not mean what you think they do, you probably mean "fringe benefits".
There is no such word as "alot".
And FFS! Stop using the word "literally" when you are not being literal.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
128. I don't understand spelling and grammar police.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:03 PM
Sep 2014

I don't get the need to hunt down and correct other people.
I would think you have more important things to do.
I find the older I get the worse I spell and my I-phone self corrects making me seem both smarter and illiterate at the same time.
I suggest you give it a rest.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
136. I agree. Some things still
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:15 PM
Sep 2014
great on me grately grate on me greatly. However, I don't believe you need to--or should--raise the matter with others unless you truly cannot follow what they are saying. And even at that, you can probably find a tactful way to get clarification without shaming or embarrassing them.

I was at a table when someone in my party gave the young waiter a lesson on "I" versus "me." I wanted to leave.

Maybe if it is your own minor child whom you are correcting and you do it in private.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
137. If I can't understand what you are saying I pass it by.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:18 PM
Sep 2014

There are many OPs that make no sense. I go on to the next one.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
138. I meant in a real life conversation with someone, where it might be more
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:24 PM
Sep 2014

respectful and maybe more necessary, to understand what someone means. At that, you are not correcting grammar or usage, only seeking clarification.

On the board, I agree with you totally. Twice in ten years of posting, I mentioned an error to someone, but only in a pm, never on the board. On those two occasions, the misuse or misspelling or whatever it was was connected to the work the poster had mentioned doing in real life. So, I thought sharing info with them might be needed, but for their own benefit.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
141. I learned a long time ago that if we
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 03:53 PM
Sep 2014

both do not have the same idea in our minds then we did not communicate.
So yes if I want to communicate I have to get your idea or thought.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
139. I don't see anyone here going out to "hunt down" people
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:26 PM
Sep 2014

But thanks for your post. Now we've got our eye on you.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
144. I used to teach for a living, but DU is not a classroom. Correcting adults in a classroom is
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 03:56 PM
Sep 2014

perfectly appropriate. That is part of why they are there.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
150. That is a different point entirely.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 04:05 PM
Sep 2014

It s necessary to call out another poster's mistake to teach that poster something, nor is it correct to assume that every poster is here to have grammar, spelling and usage corrected. Some adults very actively do NOT want that. Nor do I think the OP is a great teaching method. I am not even sure that was the intent.

The massacre of the English language continues unabated. I don't know why I bother.


Does that indicate an intent to teach?

I think Upaloopa's post teaches something too-and maybe something far more important than the difference between "wreck" and "wreak."

Response to radiclib (Original post)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
159. LOL!
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:07 PM
Sep 2014

I have to say at least one good thing about threads like this. They tend to attract some cleverly funny replies.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
163. I prefer what upaloopa's reply taught.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:30 PM
Sep 2014


For me, how adults feel about having their grammar, usage and/or spelling corrected publicly when they have not invited anyone to correct them is more important than the difference between "wreck havoc" and "wreak havoc." We all know what a person means when he or she says or posts either one, don't we?

littlemissmartypants

(22,691 posts)
164. Indeed, and neither you nor I are spuds.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:47 PM
Sep 2014

We're misunderstood sweet potatoes. I yam one and you are two.

Jokes aside.

Language is dynamic. When someone criticizes a person's verbal expression it is a personal and intolerant attack with limited empathy and warped perception.

I have never been tickled by an insult whether direct or indirect. Like the saying goes, It's all fun and games until someone gets a eye poke.

Communication is hard. Message scrambling surpasses egg scrambling in message breaks to the bearer.

The battle for understanding leaves hidden wounds but wounds just the same.

Tolerance is a virtue.
Play is essential for survival.
Words are a tricky business.
Just relax and read some Shakespeare.

And merrily, thanks for being a thoughtful friend.

~Love, Peace and Shelter.
Lmsp

merrily

(45,251 posts)
165. aw you are an easy person to be friendly to. Pure pleasure to encounter
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:52 PM
Sep 2014

on this board. I appreciate your humor and your kind words.

Love to you, as well. Smooch!

littlemissmartypants

(22,691 posts)
168. What took you so long. We've been covering for you for hours.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 06:00 PM
Sep 2014

Everyone knows that you are our one and only beloved spud.

littlemissmartypants

(22,691 posts)
171. Well. Oil. Deep subjects.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 06:06 PM
Sep 2014

And purposeful misspelling of a science fiction author's name is forgiven, but only for educational purposes.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
173. I had a heated discussion with someone over veranda rights
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 06:20 PM
Sep 2014

"sir, I demand my right to have a mint julep and fan myself on the veranda"

George II

(67,782 posts)
175. So true....and a few others:
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 06:22 PM
Sep 2014

Using "sht" in place of just "sh", like "Adminishtration", "Air Shtrikes", etc.
Saying "Urbing" in place of Urban
Acrossed in place of Across
And the one that grates on me the most, one that Al Sharpton STILL uses on network television almost every night - "aks"

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
213. It appears that you have a problem with what is primarily African American vernacular.
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 01:48 AM
Sep 2014

Perhaps I can help you understand it better, eh?

African American Vernacular English

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American_Vernacular_English


George II

(67,782 posts)
224. It appears you have a problem with making sweeping, uninformed, and incorrect assumptions....
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 10:15 AM
Sep 2014

Having grown up in NYC, I heard all but the first one as long as 60 years ago, from my white neighbors.

At a bank I worked for we had a programmer who said both "aks" and "acrossed" all the time, even after I pointed out his errors. Surprise - he was Italian raised in Brooklyn!

At my last job we had a guy in our shipping department that said "aks", a white Baptist from Alabama.

Watch CNN some afternoon - the most egregious user of the "shtrikes" vernacular is their current White House correspondent - Jim Acosta. He's not African American.

This discussion has gone over the last few days and more than two hundred responses. Everyone's having fun with it, except for you.

If you want to attach some imaginary racial implication to this, that's fine. Just don't include me in your ignorant assumptions.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
176. "Sometimes I Don't Speak Right... But Yet I Know What I'm Talking About" - WAR
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 06:26 PM
Sep 2014
WAR - "Why Can't We Be Friends"

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I seen you around for a long long time, ya
I really remembered you when you drink my wine

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I seen you walkin' down in Chinatown
I called you but you could not look around

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I bring my money to the welfare line
I see you standing in it every time

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

The color of your skin don't matter to me
As long as we can live in harmony

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I'd kinda like to be the President
So I can show you how your money's spent

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

Sometimes I don't speak right
But yet I know what I'm talking about


Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I know you're workin' for the CIA
They wouldn't have you in the Ma-fi-a

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends...


Link: http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/war/whycantwebefriends.html


 

albino65

(484 posts)
185. Pronounced "reek".
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 07:53 PM
Sep 2014

The nuns always taught us that a complete sentence has a subject and a predicate.

 

kardonb

(777 posts)
189. wreck
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:08 PM
Sep 2014

I am always so frustrated when I hear and read "native" Americans that cannot use their own language properly . Spelling correctly seems a huge obstacle course .
I learned English as a second language , and consider myself pretty versatile in it .

Treat your mother tongue as a treasure , please . English is such a beautiful and rich language . Respect it , and LEARN to use it properly !

niyad

(113,329 posts)
195. where did you get the idea it meant to eliminate?
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:14 PM
Sep 2014

verb (used with object)
1.
to inflict or execute (punishment, vengeance, etc.):
They wreaked havoc on the enemy.
2.
to carry out the promptings of (one's rage, ill humor, will, desire, etc.), as on a victim or object:
He wreaked his anger on the office staff.

renate

(13,776 posts)
218. I am unhappy and itchy
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 04:20 AM
Sep 2014

I don't want to be dogmatic about grammar; language is fluid, so part of me is all "let it go" and the other part is all

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
228. "Mute point"
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 10:36 AM
Sep 2014

I nearly laughed in a supervisor's face once when she came out with that one.

I had a co-worker who had to sit in on a court session for a class he was taking. He came back to work, completely puzzled, because the judge kept saying things "passed mustard." I explained that it was actually "passed muster," and that passing mustard indicates that you may have eaten a bad hot dog.

The same guy came back from a camping trip and misquoted a sign near a lighthouse. He said it said, "Trespassers will be violated." The images that conjured . . .

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Listen up, spuds. "W...