General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsListen up, spuds. "Wreck havoc" is not a thing
Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2014, 09:02 PM - Edit history (1)
The word is "wreak". Pronounced "reek". It means to perform, inflict, or execute (something). If one were to "wreck havoc", one would presumably eliminate havoc. Which would presumably be a good thing.
The massacre of the English language continues unabated. I don't know why I bother.
On edit: Mostly intended for the legions of illiterates who are paid big money to write and blather on the TeeVee. "..blahblah Isis wrecking havoc on the Middle East blahblah.."
No offense to you regular plain-speakin' folks. Plus, "spuds" is a Devo thing.
This has got to be the lamest thread ever top make the "Greatest" page. Make the madness stop!
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,731 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)The word is "wreak." Pronounced "reek."
okay!
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)Either that, or I have groan far to costumed too misplaced periods.
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Is a convention, not a rule.
I happen to follow the convention that punctuation goes inside quotes unless the quoted material has its own punctuation or to do so would be confusing.
But that doesn't make the OP wrong.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Punctuation always goes inside quotes. Very few exceptions to the rule...er, convention.
merrily
(45,251 posts)it just about did become a rule, as you say.
I don't know if it made into school texts, though.
SunSeeker
(51,564 posts)Other punctuation marks are inside the quotation marks only if they are part of the original text.
And yes, it is a rule, at least it is in federal Bluebook and the California Style Manual for legal writing.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)1. Are you aware that some punctuators are confused about "quotation marks"?
2. He asked, "Should there be a period at the end of this sentence?". <---?
SunSeeker
(51,564 posts)More examples:
Was the defendant heard to say, "I confess"?
The officer shouted, "Halt!"
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)SunSeeker
(51,564 posts)The general rule is you don't double up concluding punctuation marks, but I imagine an exception is made when the concluding punctuation mark within the quote left alone does not reflect the meaning of the sentence. I tried to find the rule for that and couldn't. I suspect that you would need to add a question mark, even though you already have what would otherwise be a concluding punctuation mark in the form of an exclamation point, since without the question mark the sentence would appear to be a declaratory sentence rather than a question.
I imagine most writers avoid this conundrum by just deleting the exclamation point.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)thanks! I didn't know there were still people who knew these things.
demigoddess
(6,641 posts)The punctuation of this kind is so often wrong and it bugs me.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)Did she say, "yes," "no," or "maybe"?
SunSeeker
(51,564 posts)demigoddess
(6,641 posts)Did she say "yes", "no", or "maybe"?
or it could be
Did she say "yes!", "no!", or "maybe"?
the commas are not required in the last two such as
democrats, republicans and independents. can also be
democrats, republicans, and independents.
either one is correct.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)And while I haven't looked in my old copies of Chicago Manual of Style, memory tells me that they favored punctuation outside quotes. Certainly my Macquarie Dictionary and style guide (Australia) prefers it that way (calling it the "English" system).
That makes it a convention and not a rule in my book.
valerief
(53,235 posts)so many people write it incorrectly I'm not sure if the rule is changing.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)For example, so many people use "fulsome" as a synonym for "extensive" (rather than in its correct meaning of extravagant, overdone, offensive to good taste) that it's coming into acceptance for its incorrect usage.
"Doubt" went through the same history, having originally meant to suspect, while "misdoubt" meant something closer to the modern "doubt."
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)these errors.
radiclib
(1,811 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)just before he got mauled by the female grizzly.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...calm Urself.
what really gets my dander up is " off of " .
a2liberal
(1,524 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)alerting the spocksman
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Warpy
(111,268 posts)However, yes, that one drives me nuts, too, along with "reigning in" something or someone, so I'll join you in wearing the pedant's cap.
It's REINING in.
It's time to rein in our militarized police before they wreak more havoc upon innocent civilians.
I'm changing my handle to Proud Pedant. Thanks!
Vine Gatherer
(94 posts)leftieNanner
(15,115 posts)only if there's a hole in the roof.
Warpy
(111,268 posts)I don't know why, but they all seem to laboriously type in "reigning."
My mother used to cringe and whimper at "irregardless" and "consensus of opinion," both corporatespeak that my dad picked up and I was convinced he used when he was home solely to drive her around the bend.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)in both of the two instances in each case.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)enki23
(7,789 posts)But you know you are going to loose this one.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)grattsl
(63 posts)It is great fun in my world. I love getting her excited. Making up is the best. Until next time, have fun and ...
Wreck havoc!!!
missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)Oh, wait, no. I really couldn't 😉
Logical
(22,457 posts)reflection
(6,286 posts)No actually, I have a weird Rain Man ability to spot a typo in a wall of text immediately. That being said, now I'm sure I have made a typo somewhere recently that will contradict this assertion.
johnp3907
(3,731 posts)It doesn't jive. It begs the question of what begging the question means.
I'll stop now.
elias49
(4,259 posts)leftieNanner
(15,115 posts)oh wait....
I'm sorry, this is just too much fun. Needed some laughs tonight.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)catchnrelease
(1,945 posts)I knew you wouldn't let me down!
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)I'm not sure I knew that And I consider myself well read.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:56 AM - Edit history (1)
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)Alot? There's no such word as alot. It took a lot for me to write this.
I guess you were being facetious, right?
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)But actually there is such a word as allot, it means "to allocate or distribute". i.e. "allotment"
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)'I see that allot' ~
'I see that allot a lot'
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)Spelling, schmelling.
When spell checking becomes a bother...nobody cares.
elias49
(4,259 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)elias49
(4,259 posts)Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)They could barely make mince meat
Low self of steam (Low self-esteem)
Whoa is me (Woe)
Hes in tensive care
Escape goat (Scape)
use to
ad homonym (hominem)
I could care less
Tow the line (toe)
Taken for granite
A mute point (moot)
I did a complete 360 on the issue (180)
Baited breath (bated is correct, but it's common usage)
Chomping at the bit (champing is the correct word, but it's in common usage now)
as a pose to
In one foul swoop (fell)
Butt naked (buck)
Pre-madonna (prima donna)
excedra
expresso
living in squabble (squalor)
supposably
Irregardless (regardless)
Pacifically
vice (-like) grip (Vise)
rediculous
Walla (voilà)
raised to the ground (razed)
Administrate (administer)
Orientate (orient)
try and (try to)
all of the sudden
spaded (spayed)
murial (mural)
Certificated (certify)
Deep seeded (seated)
Could of/ should of/ would of
A new leash on life (lease)
alot
well-healed (heeled)
anyways
down the pipe (down the pike)
libary
beckon call
Febuary
for all intensive purposes
prostrate (prostate)
low and behold (lo)
awhile
contex
conjunctionitis
"up on" instead of "upon"
beyond the pail (pale)
less we forget/unless we forget/least we forget (lest)
per say (se)
alterior motive
Here, here! (hear)
I should have did that
I should've went
Doggy Dog (dog eat dog)
card shark (cardsharp)
blessing in the sky (blessing in disguise)
rod/rot iron (wrought)
rain of terror (reign)
shined instead of shone
Another thing coming (think)
Point of you
tender hooks
contra section
conversate
hisself
noone
fixin' to
exscape
hew and cry
heart-wrenching instead of heart-rending (or worse, heart-rendering)
full proof
"to pay in the rear" instead of "to pay in arrears"
on accident (as a parallel construct to 'on purpose')
world wind (whirlwind)
snuck
hard road to hoe (row to hoe)
cut to the chase (cut through the chafe) *also in common usage now
griss for the mill (grist)
begs the question (misused, not 'wrong')
cut the mustard (muster) *also in common usage
went missing (disappeared)
sneaking suspicion (sinking)
Different than (from)
ice tea (iced)
iced cream (ice)
reign in
epitomy
gotten
flack (flak)
lynchpin
Send in the calvary!
on guard (engargde / en garde)
based off of (based on)
if and when
unless and until
obligated (obliged)
Nauseous (nauseated)
anchors away (aweigh)
meteoric rise (meteors fall)
commander and chief
Free reign
bold faced lie (bald or bare)
almost exactly
drownded
Running the Gauntlet (Gantlet) * common usage these days
Marshall law (martial)
flaunt the law (flout)
between you and I
on the lamb (lam)
in tact
pack (pact)
vocal chords (cords)
the gig is up
nip it in the butt (bud)
one in the same (one and the same)
Statue of limitations (statute)
Extract revenge (exact)
Momento (memento)
Scotch free / scott free (scot)
Hone in on (home)
Feeble position (fetal)
Giving some leadway (leeway)
without further à deux
or confuse these for each other:
Decimate / obliterate
Flounder / founder
Disinterested / uninterested
Loose / lose
dilemma / quandary
to / too
Affect / Effect
weary / wary
marquis / marquee
bawling / balling
piqued / peeked / peaked
eminent / imminent
bearing / baring / barring
flair / flare
exuberant / exorbitant
lay / lie / laid / lain
discrete / discreet
its / it's
there / they're / their
your / you're
oral / verbal
Statute / Statue
threw / though
seen / scene
capitol / capital
goat / goad
good / well
sell / sale
site / sight
faze / phase
tenant / tenet
then / than
jibe / jive
less / fewer
ideal / idea
whenever / when
myriad / many
shined / shone
invite / invitation
moral / morale
weak / reek
brake / break
peddle / pedal
seen / saw
seen / scene
Conscious / conscience
succeed / Secede
imply / infer
drug / dragged
dissent / descent / decent
sleighs / slays
born / borne
compliment / complement
over / more (we've been in business for over 50 years / we've been in business for more than 50 years)
dribble / drivel
diffuse / defuse
redundancy:
Over-exaggerate
Hot Water Heater
PIN number
PC Computer
ATM machine
HIV virus
very unique
the hoi polloi
Fleeting glimpse
extol praise
frozen tundra
tuna fish
with au jus
Free Gift
Added Bonus
"in the process of"
Chai tea ('chai' is Hindi for 'tea')
using an adjective instead of an adverb:
"Drive Safe" instead of "Drive Safely"
"you got here quick"
"Don't take it personal."
penultimate - does NOT mean "the last", but the one before the last.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)book of Idiotms.
JEB
(4,748 posts)It's a real conservation peace.
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)Or any other similarly constructed phrase.
(And everyone from PA, creeping into NE Ohio, is going ?
But very impressive list.
Unvanguard
(4,588 posts)The entries on the list are (predominantly) cases where idioms and common phrases are gotten slightly wrong in ways that render them nonsensical. There's nothing wrong with "needs fixed" if that's the language in the place where you live.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)Here's an explanation of the other variation of the construction "needs fixing"
I dislike working late. (???)
I dislike to work late. (???)
When to use the infinitive
The infinitive form is used after certain verbs:
- forget, help, learn, teach, train
- choose, expect, hope, need, offer, want, would like
- agree, encourage, pretend, promise
- allow, can/can't afford, decide, manage, mean, refuse
I forgot to close the window.
Mary needs to leave early.
Why are they encouraged to learn English?
We can't afford to take a long holiday.
https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-m_infinitive-ing.htm
The phrase is missing the to + infinitive "to be." The correct construction would be "needs to be fixed"
There are discussions which describe it as a dialect - so I might place it in the list with the way baited breath and chomping at the bit are: needs fixed (needs to be fixed is correct, but it's local dialect for some)
Unvanguard
(4,588 posts)It is grammatically correct in other dialects of English (one in particular). I'm familiar with the rule you reference, but rules of grammar are not universal objective laws that exist outside of actual usage. There's no reason to stigmatize it as "incorrect" in colloquial usage (like on DU).
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)Unvanguard
(4,588 posts)That has nothing to do with dialect, it has to do with preserving the connection between the meanings of phrases and the meanings of the words that make them up. That strikes me as worthier than indoctrinating everyone in one particular kind of English's (often artificial) rules of grammar. Though there's plenty of complaints about alleged word misuse that I think are similarly misconceived, like the objections to the figurative use of "literally" (which is an old and well-established alternative usage of the word, and a natural evolution from its non-figurative meaning).
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)... raised by eastern Ohio hill farmers, I have absolutely NO idea what you're talking about. Nope. No idea at all.
(Spouse has always said that if I were Shakespeare, Hamlet would have just said "or not." Our first apartment was #2B. Spouse laughed his ass off about that.)
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)teaching in an inner city 99.9% black school - so for years I thought it was an ethnic dialect. Until I worked later for a very well educated white boss who also used it and finally figured out the PA connection.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)People in Philadelphia generally have "to be" as part of their everyday vocabulary.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)So that fits.
Maynar
(769 posts)You win the internets today.
Not Sure
(735 posts)Brilliant!
Thank you, whoever came up with that one.
eppur_se_muova
(36,266 posts)referring to divas from days past, of course.
Response to eppur_se_muova (Reply #181)
eppur_se_muova This message was self-deleted by its author.
kath
(10,565 posts)Things like "she spent the evening pouring over the documents" drive me insane.
Nay
(12,051 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)It's "vice" in British English:
5. A tool composed of two jaws, opened and closed by means of a screw, which firmly grip and hold a piece of work in position while it is being filed, sawn, or otherwise operated upon; used especially by workers in metal or carpenters. Cf. hand-vice.
The spelling vise is now usual only in U.S.
It's also more commonly "orientate" in British English than "orient". And it's also usually "different to" and not "different than".
"Shined" instead of "shone" makes me grit my teeth, though (I've even seen it in the New York Times; do people have something against irregular verbs?)
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Certificate (as a verb) rather than certify, e.g.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)It's almost always supposed to be different from.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)And is in fact the original form of the phrase:
http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2014/01/different-from-than-to/
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Lots of things are archaic and/or common without being technically correct. Even in educated circles. For example I've never known anyone, even the most dedicated grammar nerd, get the fewer/less contrast precisely right. Yes it's really 10 items or fewer, but if I have 11 (incidentally whether that should be "eleven" or not depends on whether it's a book or a newspaper style you prefer) and pedantically decide to cast one aside, do I now have one fewer or one less item? Answers on a postcard. ...
There IS a case where different than is technically correct. If the comparison is a clause that has a stated or implied "have" or "do" verb.
John has a different hairstyle than I (have).
Steve does different chores than George (does).
But straight comparisons are different from.
Now of course these kinds of technicalities are fun to discuss when the topic comes up, but in real life I couldn't care less. Well not often. Using adjectives as adverbs bugs me for some reason.
But that's different than caring about 10 items or fewer. I'll try and remember that.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)They still use asterisks rather than spell out "bloody", for instance.
Note that the verb differ is never followed by 'to'.
In American English, but much less in British English, different is commonly followed by 'than', especially when a clause follows AmE It was all very different than they had imagined BrE It was all very different from / to what they had imagined.
RECOMMENDATION: use different from or different to; avoid different than, which is common in American English.
http://www.chambers.co.uk/search.php?query=differently&title=21st
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Dictionaries cite usages, correct or otherwise.
From your same source
http://www.chambers.co.uk/search.php?query=ain%27t&title=21st
I'm not of the opinion that innovation is necessarily desirable. I'm well aware that descriptive linguistics is a valid discipline tracking changes in actual language use, but that doesn't make it the final resource for correct language use. There is a reason reputable news and publishing companies have style manuals and don't just tell editors to use dictionaries.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Obviously eating desert is difficult but "The enemy called for our troops to dessert," takes the trifle
justabob
(3,069 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)never saw that before, hilarious!
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)OMG What a list. The laughter is killing me.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)That's my favorite Freeperism.
Of course, this classic is near and dear to my funny bone:
?w=330
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)That phrase always reminds me of the old Jerry Clower routine:
The nurse told me to get undressed, and I asked "buck" nekkid?
She looked at me over her glasses and said "is there a difference between naked and buck naked?"
I said "yes ma'am. You can be nekkid and still have your socks on."
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)3catwoman3
(24,006 posts)...your delightful list item by item. Seeing as I have not yet done that, I don't know if it contains one of the latest egregious grammar offenses - making a possessive out of "I". When I hear things like, "John and I's vacation, I want to scream .
3catwoman3
(24,006 posts)...denier, as in "climate change denier," because I learned it as a term referring to the gauge/fineness of a knit product, most commonly used when referring to the sheerness of hosiery.
kath
(10,565 posts)i see that one almost as much as the lose/loose confusion.
And then there's "dinning room" for dining room.
ARGGGGHHH.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)wreak havoc (with something)
to cause a lot of trouble with something; to ruin or damage something. Your bad attitude will wreak havoc with my project. The rainy weather wreaked havoc with our picnic plans.
See also: havoc, wreak
http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/wreak+havoc
radiclib
(1,811 posts)Your definition requires both words. Why do I need to explain this?
Epic fail indeed. Back to school with you!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)no back to school with YOU!
two words together never have a meaning? ARE you serious?
radiclib
(1,811 posts)Who ever said that? And your dictionary defined "idiom" does not include the word "wreck". Unless it was written by idiots.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)did you not?
radiclib
(1,811 posts)"Wreakhavoc". But why is there a space in the middle? And is it a noun, or an adjective? I'm confused..
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Your definition requires both words. Why do I need to explain this?
radiclib
(1,811 posts)I didn't want to insult you with the "thingie". I sincerely do not understand where you're coming from. Do you think "wreck" is the same as "wreak"? I DO NOT want to be snarky, but are you dyslexic?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)no you didn't....you were speaking about wreak....
radiclib
(1,811 posts)I'm just sorry that I'll never know what the fuck your problem with the OP was to begin with. Epic fail indeed.
hunter
(38,317 posts)The rainy weather f---ed up our picnic plans.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Mariana
(14,858 posts)I learned the past tense of wreak is wrought.
The rainy weather wrought havoc with our picnic plans.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)wreak
[reek] Spell Syllables
Synonyms Examples Word Origin
verb (used with object)
1.
to inflict or execute (punishment, vengeance, etc.):
They wreaked havoc on the enemy.
2.
to carry out the promptings of (one's rage, ill humor, will, desire, etc.), as on a victim or object:
He wreaked his anger on the office staff.
...
Synonyms Expand
1. visit, vent, unleash.
....
...
Word Origin
Old English wrecan; related to Old Frisian wreka, Old High German rehhan (German rächen), Old Norse reka, Latin urgēre to push
....
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/wreaked
JEB
(4,748 posts)OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)"Nauseous" when you mean "nauseated."
"The sight of that makes me nauseous." No, it doesn't. It makes you NAUSEATED. If you say "The sight of that makes me nauseous," you are saying that the sight of something makes you cause other people to be nauseated.
"Anxious" when you mean "eager."
"We were anxious to get to grandma's house." No, you were "eager" to get to grandma's.
"Anxious" means you are looking forward to something and you are concerned it will be bad. "Eager" means you are looking forward to what you expect will be a joyful event.
reflection
(6,286 posts)Learn something every day. Thank you!
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)hunter
(38,317 posts)So did the police.
I inherited my berserker genes from her.
Fortunately these are kept in check by the depression genes I inherited from my grandfathers.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)Old Crow
(2,212 posts)I'd never seen it before and I loved it. Thanks!
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)(I hope that subject line was like fingernails on a chalkboard.)
navarth
(5,927 posts)You'll get plenty of ignoramuses calling you a 'spelling nazi', etc. Fuck 'em.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)you got nothin'.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)my wife said a real funny thing this morning.
I told her when I am retired (she will still be working) I'll text her when I make a real great golf shot. She said and I'll text "is the laundry done?"
Sounds very wifely. In fact....ooops gotta go, she wants me to carry something.
cer7711
(502 posts). . . instead of "VIR-bee-ij" when mispronouncing the three-syllable word "verbiage"?
Drives me fucking crazy! "We've got to get the VIR-bij right on this," they'll say while I think to myself, "What, you only care about getting the verbs right in this document?!"
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Good for you!
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)I beg to differentiate.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)If something has an effect on you, you are affected by it. (People also need to stop using "impact" as a verb because they don't know the difference between "affect" and "effect" .
Laffy Kat
(16,382 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Excetera, excetera, excetera.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Drives me crazy.
Cha
(297,275 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Bookmarked for a leisurely read tomorrow.
Thanks, radiclib!
Response to radiclib (Original post)
A-Schwarzenegger This message was self-deleted by its author.
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)Some may mistake you for a bullsh*ting terrorist. Nice hat though.
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)area51
(11,910 posts)The usage of non-word "noone" instead of "no one".
klook
(12,155 posts)2naSalit
(86,646 posts)newkyooler.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I never heard it pronounced any other way by any person be it neighbor or educator.
It wasn't until I moved to Los Angeles at age 20 and became involved with an anti-nuke organization that I heard it pronounced correctly. (And I was lightly mocked for pronouncing it incorrectly.)
Being a stutterer... regularly as a child, intermittently as an adult, it was a very difficult pronunciation hurdle for me to overcome. I'd panic every time I had to say it and often found myself stuck on the 'k" sound.
Thirty five years later, I've pert near overcome it but every once in a while I find my brain still directs me to mispronounce it and thus, I employ a tactic that my speech therapist taught me to deal with my stuttering. Slow down and imagine saying the word before you say it.
And even then, at times, it does not work so I excuse myself to go to the bathroom.
kath
(10,565 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)They will punish you.
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)They firmly plant us on one side or the other to lie with each other.
WhiteAndNerdy
(365 posts)Another one I can't stand is when people write "formally" when they mean "formerly." I've seen people write that they were "formally known as X" where "X" was a previous screen name that could not possibly be their formal name.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Havoc a nice evening.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I KNEW the difference, but writing on deadline it just accidentally came out that way. Our student copyreading/editing class missed it and my mistake was published on the front page of the USC Daily Trojan.
That was 40 years ago and I've been doing penants ever since.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)tblue37
(65,394 posts)as in "That makes me wretch <sic>."
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)wracking!
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)as in "put on the (torture) rack".
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)And some say the two words are now interchangeable in this context. No matter which word you use, you're likely to get an argument.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)the etymology is definitely from the rack, the medieval torture instrument. "Wrack" means "wreck or devastation".
Alkene
(752 posts)without being a self-righteous, judgmental prig.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:32 PM - Edit history (1)
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Someone didn't hang or hung themselves, they hanged themselves.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)reflection
(6,286 posts)And I don't except your premise. I think this post was merely to illicit a bad response.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)I'm a fully-grown potato!
reflection
(6,286 posts)In the past couple of years I've seen the word 'whinge' show up in lieu of 'whine.' I realize the word is correct and has merit, but why did it suddenly burst on the scene so quickly? Or has it been used a lot and I just missed it?
My gut tells me with the advent of global communication, all of these subtle English differences between cultures bleed into our vocabularies, either consciously or subconsciously. But that's just a hunch.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)All UK English. Cable TV & the internet have made a muddle of english-speaking cultures.
reflection
(6,286 posts)I knew someone would know.
Nay
(12,051 posts)expect a modicum of grammatical ability, makes me want to kill myself. I also will say that over the 10 years I have been on DU, grammatical ability has dropped even lower. It's quite obvious that no one reads edited material (like books) any more, so they don't learn the correct spelling of the words they hear, as in your example. Everyone is learning grammar, spelling, and usage from the Internet. Deadly.
johnp3907
(3,731 posts)(And now I hate myself because I'm wondering if "nowadays" is a real word!)
fishwax
(29,149 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)mmm ... havoc on weck
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)It's a "moot point" not a "mute point".
"French benefits" do not mean what you think they do, you probably mean "fringe benefits".
There is no such word as "alot".
And FFS! Stop using the word "literally" when you are not being literal.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I don't get the need to hunt down and correct other people.
I would think you have more important things to do.
I find the older I get the worse I spell and my I-phone self corrects making me seem both smarter and illiterate at the same time.
I suggest you give it a rest.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I was at a table when someone in my party gave the young waiter a lesson on "I" versus "me." I wanted to leave.
Maybe if it is your own minor child whom you are correcting and you do it in private.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)There are many OPs that make no sense. I go on to the next one.
merrily
(45,251 posts)respectful and maybe more necessary, to understand what someone means. At that, you are not correcting grammar or usage, only seeking clarification.
On the board, I agree with you totally. Twice in ten years of posting, I mentioned an error to someone, but only in a pm, never on the board. On those two occasions, the misuse or misspelling or whatever it was was connected to the work the poster had mentioned doing in real life. So, I thought sharing info with them might be needed, but for their own benefit.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)both do not have the same idea in our minds then we did not communicate.
So yes if I want to communicate I have to get your idea or thought.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)But thanks for your post. Now we've got our eye on you.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)I teach for a living.
Yeah, I imagine there are more important things to do.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)perfectly appropriate. That is part of why they are there.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)It s necessary to call out another poster's mistake to teach that poster something, nor is it correct to assume that every poster is here to have grammar, spelling and usage corrected. Some adults very actively do NOT want that. Nor do I think the OP is a great teaching method. I am not even sure that was the intent.
The massacre of the English language continues unabated. I don't know why I bother.
Does that indicate an intent to teach?
I think Upaloopa's post teaches something too-and maybe something far more important than the difference between "wreck" and "wreak."
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)trackfan
(3,650 posts)Ultimately, lingua penes populi.
Response to radiclib (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
sammythecat
(3,568 posts)Seriously
reflection
(6,286 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I have to say at least one good thing about threads like this. They tend to attract some cleverly funny replies.
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)Has become both a teaching tool and a teachable moment.
Bookmarking.
merrily
(45,251 posts)For me, how adults feel about having their grammar, usage and/or spelling corrected publicly when they have not invited anyone to correct them is more important than the difference between "wreck havoc" and "wreak havoc." We all know what a person means when he or she says or posts either one, don't we?
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)We're misunderstood sweet potatoes. I yam one and you are two.
Jokes aside.
Language is dynamic. When someone criticizes a person's verbal expression it is a personal and intolerant attack with limited empathy and warped perception.
I have never been tickled by an insult whether direct or indirect. Like the saying goes, It's all fun and games until someone gets a eye poke.
Communication is hard. Message scrambling surpasses egg scrambling in message breaks to the bearer.
The battle for understanding leaves hidden wounds but wounds just the same.
Tolerance is a virtue.
Play is essential for survival.
Words are a tricky business.
Just relax and read some Shakespeare.
And merrily, thanks for being a thoughtful friend.
~Love, Peace and Shelter.
Lmsp
merrily
(45,251 posts)on this board. I appreciate your humor and your kind words.
Love to you, as well. Smooch!
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)That's a kick in the mouthpiece.
taterguy
(29,582 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)Everyone knows that you are our one and only beloved spud.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)It's important.
littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)And purposeful misspelling of a science fiction author's name is forgiven, but only for educational purposes.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)For all intensive purposes.
It takes two to tangle.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)"sir, I demand my right to have a mint julep and fan myself on the veranda"
George II
(67,782 posts)Using "sht" in place of just "sh", like "Adminishtration", "Air Shtrikes", etc.
Saying "Urbing" in place of Urban
Acrossed in place of Across
And the one that grates on me the most, one that Al Sharpton STILL uses on network television almost every night - "aks"
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Perhaps I can help you understand it better, eh?
African American Vernacular English
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American_Vernacular_English
George II
(67,782 posts)Having grown up in NYC, I heard all but the first one as long as 60 years ago, from my white neighbors.
At a bank I worked for we had a programmer who said both "aks" and "acrossed" all the time, even after I pointed out his errors. Surprise - he was Italian raised in Brooklyn!
At my last job we had a guy in our shipping department that said "aks", a white Baptist from Alabama.
Watch CNN some afternoon - the most egregious user of the "shtrikes" vernacular is their current White House correspondent - Jim Acosta. He's not African American.
This discussion has gone over the last few days and more than two hundred responses. Everyone's having fun with it, except for you.
If you want to attach some imaginary racial implication to this, that's fine. Just don't include me in your ignorant assumptions.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
I seen you around for a long long time, ya
I really remembered you when you drink my wine
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
I seen you walkin' down in Chinatown
I called you but you could not look around
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
I bring my money to the welfare line
I see you standing in it every time
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
The color of your skin don't matter to me
As long as we can live in harmony
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
I'd kinda like to be the President
So I can show you how your money's spent
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Sometimes I don't speak right
But yet I know what I'm talking about
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
I know you're workin' for the CIA
They wouldn't have you in the Ma-fi-a
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends...
Link: http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/war/whycantwebefriends.html
Billy Budd
(310 posts)Reeks havoc means it smells like troubles...
albino65
(484 posts)The nuns always taught us that a complete sentence has a subject and a predicate.
I am always so frustrated when I hear and read "native" Americans that cannot use their own language properly . Spelling correctly seems a huge obstacle course .
I learned English as a second language , and consider myself pretty versatile in it .
Treat your mother tongue as a treasure , please . English is such a beautiful and rich language . Respect it , and LEARN to use it properly !
Vattel
(9,289 posts)niyad
(113,329 posts)verb (used with object)
1.
to inflict or execute (punishment, vengeance, etc.):
They wreaked havoc on the enemy.
2.
to carry out the promptings of (one's rage, ill humor, will, desire, etc.), as on a victim or object:
He wreaked his anger on the office staff.
radiclib
(1,811 posts)Read the post.
niyad
(113,329 posts)Try reading again. Concentrate this time.
eppur_se_muova
(36,266 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)I don't want to be dogmatic about grammar; language is fluid, so part of me is all "let it go" and the other part is all
valerief
(53,235 posts)TCM fan version: June Havoc
cwydro
(51,308 posts)type "tow" the line.
Drives me insane.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)I nearly laughed in a supervisor's face once when she came out with that one.
I had a co-worker who had to sit in on a court session for a class he was taking. He came back to work, completely puzzled, because the judge kept saying things "passed mustard." I explained that it was actually "passed muster," and that passing mustard indicates that you may have eaten a bad hot dog.
The same guy came back from a camping trip and misquoted a sign near a lighthouse. He said it said, "Trespassers will be violated." The images that conjured . . .
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Good post. Thank you for sharing this article.