Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:37 AM Sep 2014

Mysterious Fake Cellphone Towers Are Intercepting Calls All Over The US


Seventeen fake cellphone towers were discovered across the U.S. last week, according to a report in Popular Science.

Rather than offering you cellphone service, the towers appear to be connecting to nearby phones, bypassing their encryption, and either tapping calls or reading texts.

Les Goldsmith, the CEO of ESD America, used ESD's CryptoPhone 500 to detect 17 bogus cellphone towers. ESD is a leading American defense and law enforcement technology provider based in Las Vegas.

With most phones, these fake communication towers are undetectable. But not for the CryptoPhone 500, a customized Android device that is disguised as a Samsung Galaxy S III but has highly advanced encryption.

Goldsmith told Popular Science: " Interceptor use in the U.S. is much higher than people had anticipated. One of our customers took a road trip from Florida to North Carolina and he found eight different interceptors on that trip. We even found one at South Point Casino in Las Vegas.”

The towers were found in July, but the report implied that there may have been more out there.

Although it is unclear who owns the towers, ESD found that several of them were located near U.S. military bases.

"Whose interceptor is it? Who are they, that's listening to calls around military bases? Is it just the U.S. military, or are they foreign governments doing it? The point is: we don't really know whose they are," Goldsmith said to Popular Science.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/mysterious-fake-cellphone-towers-intercepting-162645809.html
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mysterious Fake Cellphone Towers Are Intercepting Calls All Over The US (Original Post) HipChick Sep 2014 OP
Says the CEO of the company who makes the only phone that can "detect" them Recursion Sep 2014 #1
It's still interesting in that he's gone public Warpy Sep 2014 #3
You're just taking his word that they exist at all Recursion Sep 2014 #4
I find the whole idea interesting Warpy Sep 2014 #5
You didn't see the bits about the "advanced encryption" and "ultra-secure firmware" Recursion Sep 2014 #6
I have a Samsung S4 marym625 Sep 2014 #10
Check out the Replicant project Recursion Sep 2014 #16
Thank you marym625 Sep 2014 #17
So there's two different issues that get conflated Recursion Sep 2014 #18
From the article it looks like... tonedevil Sep 2014 #19
The ACLU has been trying to marym625 Sep 2014 #8
The ACLU has been asking about Stingray. You're assuming that's what this is Recursion Sep 2014 #14
It read a bit like an advertisement, didn't it? herding cats Sep 2014 #20
absolute nothing surprises me anymore n/t marym625 Sep 2014 #2
So, you don't even have the security of a party line? Trillo Sep 2014 #7
I do confess I feel a certain amount of satisfaction knowing Warpy Sep 2014 #13
I feel the same get the red out Sep 2014 #24
Wireless was never private, it was like the net, a party line. Easy to intercept wireless for those freshwest Sep 2014 #21
If they are causing littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #9
These are Stingray devices. They're not mysterious. The ACLU has talked about them since 2012. LeftyMom Sep 2014 #11
Well, no, we don't know that Recursion Sep 2014 #12
Somebody can double check his work. LeftyMom Sep 2014 #15
Towers just don't go up overnight, permits, sit plans, hearings, etc.. Historic NY Sep 2014 #22
Or a security device. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #23
It's an advertisement for the CryptoPhone 500. Alkene Sep 2014 #25

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
3. It's still interesting in that he's gone public
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:47 AM
Sep 2014

because nobody at the appropriate agencies either believed him or thought it was a problem. You do know that Stupid's administration packed regulatory agencies with do-nothing bible school graduate Republicans, right?

I know I'd like to know who owns those towers.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. You're just taking his word that they exist at all
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:48 AM
Sep 2014

He's a man selling a product. He says "this product can detect these 'special towers' that intercept other phone calls". If you buy his phone, you'll be able to "detect" them too.

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
5. I find the whole idea interesting
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:50 AM
Sep 2014

and I don't see any salesmanship in the article, only an explanation of how those towers were detected and analyzed.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. You didn't see the bits about the "advanced encryption" and "ultra-secure firmware"
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:52 AM
Sep 2014

that are only available in the modified Samsung Galaxy that his company sells?

marym625

(17,997 posts)
10. I have a Samsung S4
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:58 AM
Sep 2014

It has more spy ware downloaded by Samsung and Verizon than anything I have ever seen before. Apps that you have no control over, do absolutely nothing for the phone or service but have complete control of everything on your phone. You can't stop it, you can't delete it.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
16. Check out the Replicant project
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:06 AM
Sep 2014
http://www.replicant.us/

Fully open-source version of Android. You can even compile it yourself if you're paranoid. Its device support is limited, but I think the S4 is on it (I have it running on an S3 I use for testing and it works fine). It also isn't compatible with the Google play store, but having a secure device is always a PITA...

marym625

(17,997 posts)
17. Thank you
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:13 AM
Sep 2014

I don't know enough of either the technology or lingo to say this correctly, but the phone has been sealed? Can't get to the root any longer so it's too late to do anything.

I am sure I said that wrong
. A good friend that knows all this stuff looked at it.

Not being paranoid. If I were paranoid I would get a different phone. What I stated is fact, about the app on the phone.

I will look at that tomorrow, thank you. Past my bed time

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
18. So there's two different issues that get conflated
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:18 AM
Sep 2014

You can always root the OS of your Android. That's different from jailbreaking the CDMA/GSM system (which can also be illegal in some circumstances).

I mentioned Replicant because your complaint was about the apps, etc. at the OS level, and Replicant is a replacement that lets you control that (it's different from what ESD claims to be doing, which is a clean rewrite of the GSM stack).

 

tonedevil

(3,022 posts)
19. From the article it looks like...
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:21 AM
Sep 2014

if you notice your phone dropping to 2G you can assume you are being monitored. I say that because to the best of my knowledge there are no 2G commercial networks operating in the US.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
8. The ACLU has been trying to
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:55 AM
Sep 2014

Details on this and has met a brick wall with the government.

The FCC said it is investigating but refuses to allow information through the FOIA

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
14. The ACLU has been asking about Stingray. You're assuming that's what this is
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:01 AM
Sep 2014

But the locations don't even match.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
20. It read a bit like an advertisement, didn't it?
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:28 AM
Sep 2014

I'm not saying that's all that it is, but it does raise flags it's being exploited by their marketing team.

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
7. So, you don't even have the security of a party line?
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:53 AM
Sep 2014

The security being you know you're not on a private line. Are the charges for these various cell phones reasonable given that they are no longer private conversations?

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
13. I do confess I feel a certain amount of satisfaction knowing
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:01 AM
Sep 2014

how many hours they must waste on totally banal chatter from teenagers and adult cell phone addicts, whoever they are.

I still want to know if this is a thing, and who owns it.

get the red out

(13,466 posts)
24. I feel the same
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:20 AM
Sep 2014

I am good for inane calls!

I was thinking yesterday how far suspicions of citizens will go; I travel fairly frequently and it's hobby related not job related; is that suspicious? When I go to a dog agility trial and call my husband saying we " blew up" in our first run, is my verbiage suspect?

The Border Collie is simply a cover for my nefarious activities, ha ha!

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
21. Wireless was never private, it was like the net, a party line. Easy to intercept wireless for those
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:32 AM
Sep 2014

Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2014, 02:16 AM - Edit history (2)

who know how to do it and it's why I've always resisted. Call me Luddite but I don't care.

When I started up my computer in my new place before I got my wired modem, it looked for a wireless router and every weirdly named router in the building was suddenly on my desktop!

And they all wanted to get all upclose and friendly with my own computer to share 'whatever' wirelessly. I cut it all off immediately as I don't have time to police all that.

Just sayin'.

littlemissmartypants

(22,656 posts)
9. If they are causing
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:57 AM
Sep 2014

Me to drop calls...I'm pissed. If it is just the regular day to day NSA surveillance... I will up my phone sex calling to epic proportions.

And we didn't like the bridge to nowhere...
the cloud's not safe anymore...
Now this...
Maybe they are... towers to the cloud...

Or the beginning of a great clothes line in the sky that homeowners associations finally won't be able to touch...

Interesting post, HipChick. Got My imagination humming.

~ Lmsp 🙌

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
11. These are Stingray devices. They're not mysterious. The ACLU has talked about them since 2012.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 12:59 AM
Sep 2014

They were used overseas for drone targeting before that, they came up in the news story months ago about how cell phone sim cards were used to find drone targets.

I swear, this board sometimes.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. Well, no, we don't know that
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:00 AM
Sep 2014

We have a map that the CEO of a company came up with and claims are mysterious towers. They don't match up with the Stingray locations.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
15. Somebody can double check his work.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:03 AM
Sep 2014

It's not like the civil libertarian and tech communities don't overlap. If he's BSing somebody will call him out on it promptly.

Stingrays are mobile devices. The WOT versions were drone mounted.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
22. Towers just don't go up overnight, permits, sit plans, hearings, etc..
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:40 AM
Sep 2014

have to be flied. In my neck of the woods the activitists come out when one is proposed or talked about. Whats he selling a new phone??

Alkene

(752 posts)
25. It's an advertisement for the CryptoPhone 500.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 06:45 AM
Sep 2014

The "mysterious fake cellphone towers" are certainly an intriguing hook, but the article is just a pretext for giving "Les Goldsmith, the CEO of ESD America," some column space to hawk his product- the GSMK CryptoPhone 500.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mysterious Fake Cellphone...