Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marym625

(17,997 posts)
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:13 AM Sep 2014

Just curious why so few people use their real names.

Last edited Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:14 AM - Edit history (1)

I went to respond to a very kind DU email I received and couldn't even use a name to address the person who wrote it. It made me check my own profile. I do have the city I live in and my first name. I didn't have my last name but only because I didn't realize what showed up when I first registered for DU. I have updated it to show my last name too.

I completely understand that there are circumstances that would cause a person to act with caution and use a handle.

If you have a job that you can't give your political opinion, for example, would be at the top of the list. Maybe if you're a hacktavist. But even then, as long as you're not advertising that in posts, what's the point?

Just seems odd to me that the majority of posters not only use a handle but don't put a name, even a first name, in their profile. This seems to be the reality of most social media, at least when political posts are the majority of what is posted.

I have been online since the 80s. Have posted on and off in various social media sites since the early 90s. Though I have, on occasion, used "Marym625," like I do here, or other handles, like I do on twitter, "LiberalHDWoman" I also use my real name in my profile.

Makes me think people are ashamed of their political beliefs. Sort of like being in the closet for LGBT people.

I would appreciate any responses to this subject.

Thank you,

Mary Mathieu

250 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just curious why so few people use their real names. (Original Post) marym625 Sep 2014 OP
More people in Austin know me as Hobbit than by the name I live under. hobbit709 Sep 2014 #1
Ha! that's a very cool reason! marym625 Sep 2014 #17
what makes you think unblock is not my real name? unblock Sep 2014 #2
I'm sorry, Unblock. marym625 Sep 2014 #18
no worries, "mary" unblock Sep 2014 #67
LMAO marym625 Sep 2014 #73
! unblock Sep 2014 #79
I maintain anonymity because of my political connections... brooklynite Sep 2014 #3
Awesome reason. Thank you! eom marym625 Sep 2014 #19
Unfortunately, there are people whose idea of political discourse is to try and damage others FrodosPet Sep 2014 #4
Have actually had that happen to me. marym625 Sep 2014 #21
That happened to me back when I was on AOL. Le Taz Hot Sep 2014 #81
Exactly. deafskeptic Sep 2014 #143
I had no idea marym625 Sep 2014 #196
I know! He wasn't the only one either. I'm glad i left that forum. n/t deafskeptic Sep 2014 #199
Why would people marym625 Sep 2014 #209
They were very against sign language for deaf children. There's more to it though than that though. deafskeptic Sep 2014 #213
I have seen some of that marym625 Sep 2014 #225
you're welcome. deafskeptic Sep 2014 #249
It's the Internet, there are crazy people who would be willing to try to ruin a career. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #5
I totally get there are legitimate reasons. marym625 Sep 2014 #22
I have realized over time that it's probably better to have a gender-neutral screen name. pnwmom Sep 2014 #150
sad world we live in marym625 Sep 2014 #176
I don't post much on this site, but I spent quite a bit of time trying to spread the liberal word Vinca Sep 2014 #6
Yeah. I actually watched Duchess St Rollins marym625 Sep 2014 #26
If you were here in the Bush era CJCRANE Sep 2014 #7
I wasn't here marym625 Sep 2014 #27
That's my main answer as well. (It's not paranoia if they really are out to get ya.) Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2014 #84
Good rule. Thanks! eom marym625 Sep 2014 #116
stalkers BanzaiBonnie Sep 2014 #8
Really good reason! marym625 Sep 2014 #37
yep--DU is relatively civil on some other boards, you run into people you really don't want to know yurbud Sep 2014 #106
Reducing one's digital footprint is a priority for many. Mercy_Queen Sep 2014 #9
I am a computer idiot. marym625 Sep 2014 #39
It's just internet safety JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #10
I understand that as well marym625 Sep 2014 #41
Same as #10. ChazII Sep 2014 #198
That's so completely understandable marym625 Sep 2014 #201
Because I... onyourleft Sep 2014 #11
Well that's a good reason. marym625 Sep 2014 #28
Because DU is full of sock puppets, party flacks, marketers, "ex" freepers, and the like. Romulox Sep 2014 #12
There's a reason marym625 Sep 2014 #42
When I first joined in 2003 it didn't occur to me that I could use a handle instead Tom Rinaldo Sep 2014 #13
Very interesting. marym625 Sep 2014 #29
Oddly enough Egnever Sep 2014 #97
It caused more of a ripple than I expected at the time Tom Rinaldo Sep 2014 #100
wasn't around DU at the time marym625 Sep 2014 #115
This message was self-deleted by its author NightWatcher Sep 2014 #14
I have no special tools - only Google gollygee Sep 2014 #20
I used Google too. I'm not logging in to one of the pay services NightWatcher Sep 2014 #23
That didn't even occur to me! gollygee Sep 2014 #25
Me either marym625 Sep 2014 #47
I know I can be found. marym625 Sep 2014 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author marym625 Sep 2014 #45
It's not the people who are trying to help you that would be a problem. peace13 Sep 2014 #76
Thank you, Kim. marym625 Sep 2014 #78
I do business with people from all points on the political compass. Throd Sep 2014 #15
Another good reason marym625 Sep 2014 #46
When I joined over 10 years ago I was too ignorant to Ron Green Sep 2014 #16
Good for you. marym625 Sep 2014 #33
Many people in this world are assholes el_bryanto Sep 2014 #24
Hi Bryant! marym625 Sep 2014 #34
I think people just use "things" for usernames...Check this out, from our past: ScreamingMeemie Sep 2014 #30
Hi Laura! marym625 Sep 2014 #35
Memories... TreasonousBastard Sep 2014 #40
It is such a bittersweet thing, to read through that thread. ScreamingMeemie Sep 2014 #44
That's sad. marym625 Sep 2014 #50
It's not always assholes moving in... TreasonousBastard Sep 2014 #52
True. good point. Thank you. eom marym625 Sep 2014 #57
Thank you so much for posting that link!!! femmocrat Sep 2014 #182
Thank you for that link marym625 Sep 2014 #219
I'm with you Mary. JNelson6563 Sep 2014 #32
I agree. marym625 Sep 2014 #36
First, I don't want my politics to lose me jobs Maeve Sep 2014 #38
Good reason marym625 Sep 2014 #48
I'll admit to a certain amount of cowardice... TreasonousBastard Sep 2014 #43
I don't think protecting yourself is cowardice marym625 Sep 2014 #49
I have always posted under my "real" name. IdaBriggs Sep 2014 #51
Seems we are much alike in some ways. marym625 Sep 2014 #55
Most welcome. It is an interesting discussion, isn't it? IdaBriggs Sep 2014 #91
Yeah, Michigan and Wisconsin marym625 Sep 2014 #114
Your husband is a wise man FrodosPet Sep 2014 #190
Truth! IdaBriggs Sep 2014 #217
Job is top of the list get the red out Sep 2014 #53
Looks like that is true for most marym625 Sep 2014 #58
It's not that I'm ashamed of my political beliefs. I just value my online privacy. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #54
Which is your right marym625 Sep 2014 #59
Because people would make fun of me. I don't see what's funny about Cecilia Snottygrubble... Violet_Crumble Sep 2014 #56
Never, Ms. Snottygrubble! marym625 Sep 2014 #62
Back in the 1990s, "Internet security experts" said Trillo Sep 2014 #60
I do remember that marym625 Sep 2014 #66
Death threats. That's my reason. riqster Sep 2014 #61
Very good reason marym625 Sep 2014 #68
I received internet and snail mail death threats Generic Other Sep 2014 #89
Yep. Same here. riqster Sep 2014 #90
Some people just outright SUCK marym625 Sep 2014 #118
Oh I've gotten those, fun times. joshcryer Sep 2014 #215
A general lack of trust bhikkhu Sep 2014 #63
I get that marym625 Sep 2014 #69
several mercuryblues Sep 2014 #64
That sucks! marym625 Sep 2014 #70
Several reasons. MadrasT Sep 2014 #65
Great reason! marym625 Sep 2014 #71
I list my rank and name Capt. Obvious Sep 2014 #72
Thank you Captain Obvious! marym625 Sep 2014 #74
Hey! Nobody said there was an officer in the thread!!! ladyVet Sep 2014 #88
Yes, much craziness out there marym625 Sep 2014 #119
I am in an area where my thoughts are a distinct minority - TBF Sep 2014 #75
Me too marym625 Sep 2014 #80
I truly appreciate all the responses marym625 Sep 2014 #77
To me it's a matter of control, privacy and management of ones time tularetom Sep 2014 #82
A good point marym625 Sep 2014 #120
I had my life threatened once on DU by DU Mail. Today, anyone, can be physically located. RKP5637 Sep 2014 #83
I understand that marym625 Sep 2014 #121
I know. xmas74 Sep 2014 #185
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Sep 2014 #85
Hi Ann! marym625 Sep 2014 #123
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Sep 2014 #241
There is very little reason for using your personal information and ladjf Sep 2014 #86
I think it's just the opposite marym625 Sep 2014 #125
I take it you haven't had someone threaten to kill you on DU. valerief Sep 2014 #87
Not anything I took seriously marym625 Sep 2014 #126
i think there are many good reasons to not use real names BUT La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2014 #92
No doubt. marym625 Sep 2014 #127
Because the internet is full of crazy people. nt Marrah_G Sep 2014 #93
Given the frequency of identity theft. . 99Forever Sep 2014 #94
I have no idea what the actual statitics are marym625 Sep 2014 #129
Plus...back in the day it was normal to use a made up name. CJCRANE Sep 2014 #95
That's funny! marym625 Sep 2014 #131
I don't know who I'm talking TO zipplewrath Sep 2014 #96
Anonymity is a fine default for the exchange of ideas. Orsino Sep 2014 #98
I don't think anyone is wrong for using an alias marym625 Sep 2014 #133
Anonymity definitely is a form of freedom bhikkhu Sep 2014 #192
i have wondered the same. i use at least my first name (ellen) and usually my state (fl). ellenfl Sep 2014 #99
Yes marym625 Sep 2014 #134
I'm not ashamed of my political beliefs, and I thank you for the advance judgement. arcane1 Sep 2014 #101
Best answer on the thread. woo me with science Sep 2014 #105
"... well, if you have nothing to hide!" RKP5637 Sep 2014 #110
so glad you added about the OP marym625 Sep 2014 #139
Yep! I thought it was a good question, marym625. I wish we could ALL be more open. What our RKP5637 Sep 2014 #153
I cannot understand marym625 Sep 2014 #162
Many Americans are brainwashed. They are conditioned to believe, but never to RKP5637 Sep 2014 #194
True. Actually marym625 Sep 2014 #195
Which is horrid marym625 Sep 2014 #137
I agree marym625 Sep 2014 #135
II like using a pen name for privacy reasons. And to confuse anyone who might want to find me-- Louisiana1976 Sep 2014 #102
I guess because I would never try to find someone marym625 Sep 2014 #138
Couldn't tell you. WilliamPitt Sep 2014 #103
You're my FAVORITE marym625 Sep 2014 #140
My car was keyed in real life for having DU and John Kerry bumper stickers... steve2470 Sep 2014 #104
Probably stupid marym625 Sep 2014 #142
I live in a small, conservative town xmas74 Sep 2014 #107
people in deep blue areas don't understand.... steve2470 Sep 2014 #108
Yep. xmas74 Sep 2014 #111
wow glad you're ok steve2470 Sep 2014 #113
This was a heavy Bush county xmas74 Sep 2014 #183
That truly sucks marym625 Sep 2014 #145
Better than it used to be. xmas74 Sep 2014 #184
Let's hope marym625 Sep 2014 #187
I get that marym625 Sep 2014 #156
See #83. n/t RKP5637 Sep 2014 #109
YIKES marym625 Sep 2014 #144
That's a good reason enough to not use your name on a forum xmas74 Sep 2014 #186
Someone posted a link to an older marym625 Sep 2014 #189
I thought I replied to you marym625 Sep 2014 #151
holy fuck shit. that's awful La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2014 #152
But not surprising xmas74 Sep 2014 #188
My daughter is a prominent journalist Bragi Sep 2014 #112
You don't need an excuse marym625 Sep 2014 #148
Because there is always a small minority on any internet group who can be malicious and cause troubl LeftishBrit Sep 2014 #117
what a horrible, paranoid person marym625 Sep 2014 #149
Engage in heated arguments with pro-gunners for a while, then get back to us. Paladin Sep 2014 #122
I have. Many many times marym625 Sep 2014 #155
"Makes me think people are ashamed of their political beliefs." Oh, right. BRILLIANT deduction. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #124
It is not an unwarranted deduction marym625 Sep 2014 #158
Because tazkcmo Sep 2014 #128
I actually do use mine for a couple of reasons. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #130
I love that reason marym625 Sep 2014 #159
If I've got any excellent writing, it's probably by accident. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #163
using your real name on a public forum is not a smart thing to do. still_one Sep 2014 #132
Can't I'm a nurse ismnotwasm Sep 2014 #136
Completely understand that marym625 Sep 2014 #164
Because you don't know who's reading. nolabear Sep 2014 #141
true. Thank you. eom marym625 Sep 2014 #171
Before this facebook social networking BS Kurska Sep 2014 #146
I understand that marym625 Sep 2014 #165
i would be looking for my shoulders. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #147
I used to use my name in posts Kelvin Mace Sep 2014 #154
Thank you, David marym625 Sep 2014 #166
Oh, I thought we were all using our real names. ZombieHorde Sep 2014 #157
Shhhhhhh... don't give anyone any ideas! FrodosPet Sep 2014 #191
I've had multiple dear friends driven off-line due to anti-feminist activism. politicat Sep 2014 #160
Thank you marym625 Sep 2014 #169
HIP & HAM? politicat Sep 2014 #172
Asshats they are! marym625 Sep 2014 #175
it is something prudent to have a handle samsingh Sep 2014 #161
Anonymity is a double-edged sword. alarimer Sep 2014 #167
That's how I feel marym625 Sep 2014 #170
There are extremely creepy people at this website who like to research other posters DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2014 #168
I believe you marym625 Sep 2014 #173
Safety. nt LeftyMom Sep 2014 #174
i used to post on huffington post drray23 Sep 2014 #177
I didn't realize they did that marym625 Sep 2014 #181
Amazing how many different responses marym625 Sep 2014 #178
Because if the women of DU knew my real name Blue_Tires Sep 2014 #179
Oh, to hide celebrity is definitely a good reason! marym625 Sep 2014 #180
I can't ever use my real name who would want a logon of jeffjohnson1317868358136 LiberalArkie Sep 2014 #193
That's one hell of a lot of marym625 Sep 2014 #205
Interesting. Quantess Sep 2014 #197
The only reason that isn't legitimate marym625 Sep 2014 #202
There is way to figure out my full name JonLP24 Sep 2014 #200
Now I can't decide if marym625 Sep 2014 #203
I've also been online since the 80s OriginalGeek Sep 2014 #204
I understand that marym625 Sep 2014 #206
The design of DU predates the "social" Internet Recursion Sep 2014 #207
I guess I don't remember it that well. marym625 Sep 2014 #208
People often do not talk politics at work applegrove Sep 2014 #210
In the way I suggest? marym625 Sep 2014 #211
You did say “It seems odd to me“.... Which implies applegrove Sep 2014 #212
and that suggests to you marym625 Sep 2014 #214
I just don‘t think we should be weakening applegrove Sep 2014 #216
I never suggested marym625 Sep 2014 #223
Because it's a big risk Shankapotomus Sep 2014 #218
It's a risk I am willing to take marym625 Sep 2014 #221
It's one thing to not be ashamed of your political affiliation Shankapotomus Sep 2014 #245
No need for sorry. marym625 Sep 2014 #246
It's about privacy. LWolf Sep 2014 #220
What I find surprising marym625 Sep 2014 #222
Cyberstalking TexasMommaWithAHat Sep 2014 #224
I'm sorry you had that happen marym625 Sep 2014 #226
I use a screen name because merrily Sep 2014 #227
Thank you marym625 Sep 2014 #229
You're welcome. merrily Sep 2014 #233
cute cartoon marym625 Sep 2014 #234
I don't live in fear. merrily Sep 2014 #235
incorrect characterization marym625 Sep 2014 #236
Oh, I didn't think you were judging me at all. merrily Sep 2014 #237
Thank you n/t marym625 Sep 2014 #238
I Use My Real Name RobinA Sep 2014 #228
Good policy marym625 Sep 2014 #231
Red state greymattermom Sep 2014 #230
Holy crap marym625 Sep 2014 #232
The R and P in rppper are my initials rppper Sep 2014 #239
left of Attila the Hun! marym625 Sep 2014 #240
Well, I do post pictures.... rppper Sep 2014 #242
I will. marym625 Sep 2014 #243
If you are able to post under your real name in an ungated community Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #244
Quite a bit there marym625 Sep 2014 #247
There are some very sick people on the internet who have no qualms about... polichick Sep 2014 #248
That's true. There are marym625 Sep 2014 #250

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
1. More people in Austin know me as Hobbit than by the name I live under.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:18 AM
Sep 2014

It all goes back to a party when I first came here.

And some of use have had more experience with various 3 letter agencies than others.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
73. LMAO
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:12 AM
Sep 2014

See, another reason I don't get it. I can say I am me all I want and unless you're a computer geek that can prove it, or know me personally, I could be lying.

But I am not.

Hell, I had an account hacked and my picture posted publicly and was still accused of actually being a dirty old man or having 10 year old pictures by jealous idiots. Actually made me feel pretty damn good about myself.

brooklynite

(94,684 posts)
3. I maintain anonymity because of my political connections...
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:21 AM
Sep 2014

I talk to a lot of elected officials, candidates and political people you read about in the news, and I'm not always comfortable talking about what they tell me if it could get traced back.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
4. Unfortunately, there are people whose idea of political discourse is to try and damage others
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:21 AM
Sep 2014

They will use that info to track down employers, friends and associates, etc. Then they will use lies and statements stripped of context to try and destroy others that they disagree with.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
21. Have actually had that happen to me.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:41 AM
Sep 2014

For me, all the more reason not to hide. But I understand I am in the minority there. Thank you for the response.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
81. That happened to me back when I was on AOL.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:24 AM
Sep 2014

This creepy, icky guy contacted my employer, sent mail to my house, called my phone. All that because a person I had befriended was talked into giving the stalker my personal information.

deafskeptic

(463 posts)
143. Exactly.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:54 PM
Sep 2014

BTW, is why I keep my profile empty.

I used to be on another forum. For some reason, that forum attracted more than it's share of narcissists, drama queens and psychopaths. I guess they wanted to feel superior to the "poor, illiterate ASL using Deaf" - especially in the Deaf education forum. Deaf education is a hot topic and debates can get intense especially when it's oralism vs manualism.

Explaining the philosophies of both methods is a bit beyond the scope of this post. In any case, my group made enemies with 4 parents who called themselves "The Horsemen" who saw themselves as the destroyers of the Deaf community. I was friendly with the Horsemen at first.

When I first started debating with them. I realized that this group might be capable of picking up info about us and using it against us so I cleared any data that could be used to track me down and I didn't put any info.

My friend wasn't nearly so discreet and in time they threatened to call her boss at work. I thought they should have been perma banned for that. One of them even threatened our moderator as well. The guy is a lawyer as well. I left the forum after a member of my group got perma banned and our moderator resigned in protest as well.

BTW. the Horsemen are in one of my FB groups. I have them on block though I can tell if they're still active by the response of the other members.

The lawyer guy threatened to call one of the parent's office and give the dirt on them to their boss when they got in a heated debate in my FB group. He almost got banned for that.

Ditto for one of the other horsemen. She has a history of setting up multiple accounts and faking ids. She got perma banned - twice - for that. Now some think she is doing the same thing in my FB group; I think they may be right. I could tell you some colorful bits about her but this is a bit beyond the scope of the post.

I'm afraid there are malicious people out there. Gotta protect yourself from them.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
196. I had no idea
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:31 PM
Sep 2014

I guess within any group there will be discourse. But to do things like that, threaten and actually go after someone's job, etc just makes no sense.

Glad you were able to protect yourself in the end

deafskeptic

(463 posts)
213. They were very against sign language for deaf children. There's more to it though than that though.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 02:38 AM
Sep 2014

I am not one of those who are anti speech. Few deaf are anti-speech even if their speech is not easily understood.
Even after I learned sign, I kept going to speech class until up to 10th grade. Speech teachers decided I didn't need therapy anymore. Speech class was in deaf school.

Oralism advocates speech and lip reading. Sign language is not allowed for fear it would affect speech.

I think lip reading is a useful skill but it has it pitfalls. There are few things lipreaders dread more than a toothless person. They're impossible to lipread. I've heard the many hearing have a hard time understanding their toothless people's speech. I believe it. It's also exhausting to lipread all day and I've ended up with a pretty bad headache in my face as a result.

Most deaf who grew up oral eventually become anti-oralism once they encounter the Deaf community. If I had a nickel for every orally raised deaf person saying they wished they had grown up with sign language at silent dinners, I could buy an island.

That's because using sign with others who use it is not a struggle to be understood by each other. It makes it so much easier to communicate with others. As much as I like the hearing, interacting with them in groups is difficult for me. Even interacting with 3 of them can be difficult at times.

Some extreme oralists (note that I said extreme) want to keep deaf children away from each other because of unfounded fears that they will make up homemade signs to each other and destroy their ability to speak. Some people want speech at all costs. Others are in denial.

While hearing parents want good speech and that is quite understandable. Most for the record, are not like the Horsemen.

Some in my group expressed the fear that the deaf community would disappear, hence why the parents named themselves the Horsemen.

One deaf woman in my FB group told me that deaf adults with out any language skills were put in mental institutions after they failed to develop speech and left there.

She has met quite a few of them. I've met a couple of such deaf people. It makes me angry to see an adult without any language skills at all. Such people really do exist though they are rare.

If what that deaf woman has told me is any indication; they're more common than I thought and not as rare as I had believed. The parents of those adults likely have personality disorders. I think the same is true for the Horsemen.

People tend to discount the deaf when they talk about their upbringing. I hope I won't be discounted here.

It's very difficult to explain this stuff in a few paragraphs.

It's a intense subject between the two camps.

Here's a couple of links that might help:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_acquisition_by_deaf_children

http://www.deafwebsites.com/education/oralism.html

marym625

(17,997 posts)
225. I have seen some of that
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 08:45 AM
Sep 2014

In TV shows. I am surprised to learn it is a bigger movement than I thought or imagined.

I also never thought about what it must be like to read certain things if you have never heard them.

I can't understand why anyone would want to take any kind of communication away from anyone. What a horrible thing to do. I had a friend once upon a time who had deaf parents. I remember thinking, watching him argue with his parents in sign language, "they're yelling at each other with their hands." I remember thinking about how hard it must have been to have to deal with so many different things, for all of them. But the parents spoke. Obviously, they taught their child, at least to some extent, to speak. What kind of life would any of them have if there wasn't sign language?

I am sorry you have yet another thing to have to deal with. Frankly, to think the deaf community would disappear because of speaking or lip reading or using any sign language seems to be just another extremist point of view. Fear mongering.

Thank you for the information, the links and for sharing this. I appreciate knowing it.

deafskeptic

(463 posts)
249. you're welcome.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 02:56 PM
Sep 2014

Last edited Wed Sep 17, 2014, 05:23 PM - Edit history (1)

and yes, that's fairly extreme.

It's understandable that parents want their deaf children to speak and to fit in within the mainstream but to go to the lengths that the Horsemen did is well... bizarre.

And many in my group wondered if it was just us. Nope. The Horsemen are having trouble getting along with hearing parents who disagree with them in my FB group.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
5. It's the Internet, there are crazy people who would be willing to try to ruin a career.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:23 AM
Sep 2014

Many of us might not have a worry, but others might be public figures or otherwise hold jobs that could be jeopardized by the exposure of our political beliefs.

It's not about shame so much as awareness of the evil that others might do.

A certain website/board invests a remarkable amount of effort in identifying DU members.

If a person here was, for example, gay or transsexual and held a job in public education, they might prefer that their identity on this board be kept private.

It's kind of a big deal!

I'm reminded of a phrase that I think relates well to the issue: "If you have nothing to hide then you won't mind being searched..."

We might have nothing to hide, it doesn't matter, our privacy is still invaluable.

I'm glad you brought up the topic, Mary

marym625

(17,997 posts)
22. I totally get there are legitimate reasons.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:44 AM
Sep 2014

Just seems there have to be more of us that are just your regular Joe/Josephine that don't have to worry about hiding.

Thanks for the reply and insight, NYC_SKP.



PS. I was not aware of the site of which you speak.

PPS: I totally, completely, 100% HATE the invasion of privacy. Please don't ever read anything I ever say to mean that stupid, inane, ridiculous excuse "if you have nothing to hide you don't have a reason to care if the government invades your privacy" stupidity.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
150. I have realized over time that it's probably better to have a gender-neutral screen name.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:05 PM
Sep 2014

Obviously, I realized that too late.



Also, I am in a position where it's better my name not get associated with my politics.

Vinca

(50,300 posts)
6. I don't post much on this site, but I spent quite a bit of time trying to spread the liberal word
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:25 AM
Sep 2014

on another site and seemed to attract psychopaths every now and again. Given the gun-happy climate in this country, I prefer to remain anonymous in order to prevent some Fox-watching goober with an AK showing up on my front porch.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
26. Yeah. I actually watched Duchess St Rollins
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:49 AM
Sep 2014

Threatened and outed in Facebook. They posted private pictures, did horrible things with her kids' pictures, threatened her life, etc. She used to post here too. Hoping she still posts or writes for some online publication. But they sure killed her spirit at the time.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,845 posts)
84. That's my main answer as well. (It's not paranoia if they really are out to get ya.)
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:31 AM
Sep 2014

Sometimes it felt like if the bushies themselves didn't come for us then their obedient patriotic minions would. I got cautious about which forums I'd use my real name on. DU- no. Letter to the editor- yes.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
106. yep--DU is relatively civil on some other boards, you run into people you really don't want to know
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:39 PM
Sep 2014

your real name.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
39. I am a computer idiot.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:13 AM
Sep 2014

I need to take the time to learn more about that. Just haven't had the time. And then, when I do start taking the time, I get distracted.

Not because I care if people know who I am but because I resent the intrusion by the government and corporations. Not that there's actually a difference anymore.

JustAnotherGen

(31,856 posts)
10. It's just internet safety
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:28 AM
Sep 2014


When I joined - I was a single woman who lived alone. I think I used to have 'Somewhere Over the Rainbow' for my hometown.

ChazII

(6,205 posts)
198. Same as #10.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:45 PM
Sep 2014

Safety is a priority for a single mom with one child. ChazII is the name I selected because when I joined there was a Chaz.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
12. Because DU is full of sock puppets, party flacks, marketers, "ex" freepers, and the like.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:31 AM
Sep 2014

Obvious bad actors (like someone give 5 or 10 time outs by the community) are allowed to post here with impunity. It's something like a once nice neighborhood that is becoming infested with crime.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
13. When I first joined in 2003 it didn't occur to me that I could use a handle instead
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:32 AM
Sep 2014

I was fired up about making my first post and never gave it a thought. It was amusing when I realized what a small minority I was in using my real name, lol. I see pros and cons both ways and I don't regret it. For me the bottom line is that my opinions are my opinions and all things considered I like owning them fully. Ironically it came up with my first OP which was one that was kind of nuanced in partially defending soldiers who served in the Iraq war. I took the position that I wanted a military that followed the orders of civilian leadership rather than one that made it's own decisions when and where to go to war. One response I got asked me "Who are you?" to which I pointed out that I, unlike the person responding, actually was using my own real name.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
100. It caused more of a ripple than I expected at the time
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 02:40 PM
Sep 2014

...which was great warm up for the primary wars that were just about to go nuclear. Those were the days.

Response to marym625 (Original post)

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
20. I have no special tools - only Google
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:39 AM
Sep 2014

and found those two results, plus names of friends, and a map to her house, in about that amount of time.

And she lives in a big city. I live in a small town.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
23. I used Google too. I'm not logging in to one of the pay services
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:46 AM
Sep 2014

Now that I think of it, you could use someone's name who you didn't like, post some horrible shit, and then wait for them to come to work to tell you about the stranger that beat their door down and kicked their ass the other day.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
31. I know I can be found.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:56 AM
Sep 2014

I can't live in fear of that. And with so many people that know how to find someone, unless the poster is an internet/computer guru, It seems pointless to me to hide.

But, I understand your point and it is 100% valid.

Response to NightWatcher (Reply #14)

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
76. It's not the people who are trying to help you that would be a problem.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:17 AM
Sep 2014

Unfortunately there are some very sick people out here. I hope you will be safe and block personal information.
Peace and love, Kim

marym625

(17,997 posts)
78. Thank you, Kim.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:21 AM
Sep 2014

I do know that. I was kidding with that response.

I appreciate the thoughts.

Peace

Mary

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
16. When I joined over 10 years ago I was too ignorant to
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:35 AM
Sep 2014

choose a "user name." When the Great Name Change opportunity happened, I decided the more courageous position was to keep my name. I've run for office and asked DU for money under my real name (not that DUers will really support a candidacy that way.)

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
24. Many people in this world are assholes
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:47 AM
Sep 2014

It doesn't matter how mildly you post someone will take offense and say mean things about you. A small number of people who are good with computers might be inspired to do more. Giving your name might make it easier on them.

But even without that risk, there's still a distancing effect when you create a name that's not you for people to take shots at.

Bryant

marym625

(17,997 posts)
34. Hi Bryant!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:02 AM
Sep 2014

Thank you. Seriously, for signing your name.

I have had my job called, private pictures posted, threatened, though never my life, and I just figure they're the ones that look like cowards and assholes.

I do have the advantage of having an awesome boss, no kids or spouse and a body I am not ashamed of. Not something everyone has or doesn't have.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
35. Hi Laura!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:04 AM
Sep 2014

Thank you!

I will bookmark for later. Didn't expect so many responses here.

I truly appreciate your signing with your name!



PS: can't seem to bookmark it. But I will read later. Thanks again

marym625

(17,997 posts)
50. That's sad.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:40 AM
Sep 2014

I don't get why good people leave just because, well, assholes move in. It's a shame.

OK I sort of get it. But it's still a shame.

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
182. Thank you so much for posting that link!!!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:57 PM
Sep 2014

I have never seen that thread before. OMG, I remember so many of those DUers, including some who have since passed away.

That was a terrible time for democrats and the shared despair truly created a bond. Reading those posts was very touching and inspiring.

They were very courageous to post their real names.

for old friends.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
32. I'm with you Mary.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:56 AM
Sep 2014

But I completely get the reasons many would do otherwise. I do find it odd to get a pm without a name though. No matter though, everyone's got their reasons and that's cool.

Julie Nelson

marym625

(17,997 posts)
36. I agree.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:07 AM
Sep 2014

I guess comparing it to being closeted was not fair. I was closeted for YEARS so I get that too.

Yeah, in a PM it would be nice to have a name. Even if fake. Just better than "Hi 12345a"

Thanks, Julie!

Maeve

(42,287 posts)
38. First, I don't want my politics to lose me jobs
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:10 AM
Sep 2014

I live in a conservative area and try to stay non-political professionally as a speaker. Second, I've had enough crazy people on my case over the years--I started posting in the "bulletin board" days--and don't want to be to open. Third, I have a very common name and wanted to make a statement with my handle (Maeve was the legendary Irish queen who went to war as part of a cattle raid. So, I started using her name after the 2000 election--another large pile of bull!)

marym625

(17,997 posts)
48. Good reason
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:35 AM
Sep 2014

All the reasons have been good. I was curious. I don't blame anyone for doing it. Just didn't understand why so many do.

Great handle!

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
43. I'll admit to a certain amount of cowardice...
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:23 AM
Sep 2014

after being stalked on Usenet years ago. I still think it's the coward's way out, but when I joined, handles seemed to be the way to go around here, so I came up with one.

I was tempted to switch to my real name a while ago, but we were able to see how many people were ignoring us and I had 30 or back then. Then, I had a post hidden and one of the jurors said the post was OK, but he voted to hide just because he didn't like me.

Figured to just leave well enough alone.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
49. I don't think protecting yourself is cowardice
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:38 AM
Sep 2014

As I said in the OP, I understand there are reasons. It just seems odd there are so many that do.

Thank you for your reply. I do appreciate it!

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
51. I have always posted under my "real" name.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:41 AM
Sep 2014

I believe it keeps me honest and (hopefully) helps me to remember to talk to others with courtesy and respect. (Okay, I am not perfect! Lol!)

During the investigation of the 2004 election I received death threats, and I believe my phone was tapped -- or it may have been that of the other activists I was speaking with -- but apparently we did not warrant the "expensive" equipment, and could always hear the "click" and not-quite-an-echo.

I have posted here on DU on controversial subjects including (but not limited to): illegal drugs, domestic terrorism/guns, police violence, jury duty, welfare fraud, school shootings, "woo" science, landlord/tenant disputes, illegal foreclosure, Syria, civil/LGBT rights, Ramadan fasting, domestic violence and abortion, plus my hatred of Reagan/Bush Wars/Smarmy Lying Republicans.

I had been a member for over eight years when I started posting about "the neighbor girl" which ended up with me being called vicious and nasty name over in the Meta forum in a way which stunned me (but made for some great reading in the presentation and was very educational in the long run). My recent opinions on domestic violence victims being "idiots" if they married perpetrators had multiple posters castigating me for being "insensitive", while my own personal experiences were discounted and several told me I am just as bad as the abusers for holding such a "controlling" opinion; it still wasn't as obnoxious as the folks a few years ago who "explained" that illegal drugs are fine, any evidence of "20% of users having issues" was simply propaganda, and my calling people in the middle of custody disputes "stupid" for endangering their right to parent their children by using weed was met with some stunning levels of entitled wrath.

Ah, there were some glorious flame wars!

I don't have time to troll message boards under pseudonyms. I stick to the simple "tell the truth" and thus don't need to worry about keeping track of any lies. That doesn't mean my opinions don't change and evolve over time -- for example, my mother was AMAZINGLY STUPID when I was a teenager, but has gotten progressively smarter the older I have gotten. Now that I have children who are a lot more like me than I am always proud of, I have even found myself calling her up to apologize for some of my more "entertaining" childhood antics.

Overall, I am still a Raving Liberal, but have changed from "Pure Stubborn Independent" to "Fine, I Guess I Will Register as a Democrat, if I Have To" so maybe that is good.

I am not a national figure - just one (stubborn) woman trying her best to make this a better world. Sometimes I am wrong, but I am not ashamed of who I am or the opinions I hold.

I'm kind of stupid that way.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
55. Seems we are much alike in some ways.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:50 AM
Sep 2014

And not so much in others. Though in relation to the OP, very much so.

I, for the first time in my life, will NOT register as a Democrat. The party is no better (well not much better) than the Republican party. For the last national elections I still argued the "lesser of 2 evils" side. No more. I am not an Obamabot and I want real change. Real hope. I don't see that in the current democratic party.

Thank you so much for your reply!

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
91. Most welcome. It is an interesting discussion, isn't it?
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:14 AM
Sep 2014

And I live in Michigan, where we see a HUGE difference in the Democrats versus Republicans. We currently have a Republican (Rick Snyder) as Governor who has made some bone headed AWFUL moves, are losing a great Democratic Senator (Senator Levin), and my own representative (Gary Peters) is running for the seat.

As my husband says, Let's Go Blue!

marym625

(17,997 posts)
114. Yeah, Michigan and Wisconsin
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:06 PM
Sep 2014

are bizarre States. Illinois is a little weird. It's really Chicago v the rest of the State

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
217. Truth!
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 06:43 AM
Sep 2014

He is not happy about losing to Notre Dame week before last, but the Appalachian State game had him very happy.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,189 posts)
54. It's not that I'm ashamed of my political beliefs. I just value my online privacy.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:47 AM
Sep 2014

And with the power of Google, I'd like my time on any internet board to be as discreet as possible.

If people Google my name here, they'd better like reading up on David Simon HBO dramas.

I try not to post too much information about the town I live in or grew up in (although I'll post frequently about my state), or my specific career, or anything that would be too much of a personal marker.

It's just a personal preference.

Violet_Crumble

(35,977 posts)
56. Because people would make fun of me. I don't see what's funny about Cecilia Snottygrubble...
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:52 AM
Sep 2014

But kids used to pick on me at school for it, and I know how brutal the We Hate Names Over Two Syllables faction at DU can be. I don't want to become their next target, so please don't let on that I told you my real name...

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
60. Back in the 1990s, "Internet security experts" said
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:56 AM
Sep 2014

not to use your real name, among other things they said. I don't remember the full rationale anymore, but believe it had something to do with theft.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
61. Death threats. That's my reason.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:57 AM
Sep 2014

Not for my sake, but for my family's.

The latest batch came from someone who at least reads DU; I sent a message to the admins, but never got a response. So I shall remain at least somewhat anonymous.

Plus sundry other countermeasures.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
68. Very good reason
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:01 AM
Sep 2014

Shame on the admins. Certainly should be at the top of the list for a response. Sorry for that.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
89. I received internet and snail mail death threats
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:07 AM
Sep 2014

over an article I wrote celebrating diversity in 2000. I am not going to make it easier for racist creeps like this to target me.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
215. Oh I've gotten those, fun times.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 04:07 AM
Sep 2014

Scared the shit out of me they found out where I lived because I use a PO Box for 99% of stuff and my private address is nearly impossible to get, I've even tried finding it myself. Even my phone number I give out is a Google phone.

bhikkhu

(10,720 posts)
63. A general lack of trust
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:58 AM
Sep 2014

in my case, I live in a RW area, and have for many years had a RW employer, and served RW customers. This has been a good refuge, one of the few places I could speak freely without worrying about local economic repercussions.

I've generally envied people who use their own name, here and elsewhere online - it would be nice, but I don't think it would work for me.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
69. I get that
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:04 AM
Sep 2014

Sort of how I feel at a gay bar. Not that I hide. Just I don't even think about the fact I am bi at a gay bar. I just am who I am. But at a straight bar, it's always on my mind.

Thank you!

mercuryblues

(14,537 posts)
64. several
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:59 AM
Sep 2014

women on this board have received rape threats. Nope, not using my real name to help out the unhinged.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
65. Several reasons.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:59 AM
Sep 2014

Primarily, because I am on the board of directors of a non-profit group and have been for many years. I tend to speak my mind on the internet. I don't want my personal opinions to be associated with the non-profit in any way. The supporters of the non-profit span all political persuasions. We need to keep our political affiliations to ourselves. I can't afford to alienate conservative Republican donors from a worthy nonpartisan non-profit just because I am a loudmouth feminist Democrat.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
88. Hey! Nobody said there was an officer in the thread!!!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:57 AM
Sep 2014

::::snaps to attention and salutes::::

I use a fake name because sometimes I like to be snarky and sarcastic here, but don't want it to affect the job I'm trying to make for myself. People are crazy, in case you haven't noticed. I've been online since 1995 or so, and I've seen way more cray cray than is probably good for me.

TBF

(32,084 posts)
75. I am in an area where my thoughts are a distinct minority -
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:17 AM
Sep 2014

that can hurt in terms of keeping jobs, people being civil to you, property damage etc. It is the same reason I don't say much about my political/religious beliefs (or lack thereof) on Facebook under my real name. That can come back on you in a big way if you live in an area where you are not the majority.

I'm glad you are comfortable enough where you are to be able to be so forthcoming. I wish it were safe for everyone to express their views without fear of repercussions.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
77. I truly appreciate all the responses
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:19 AM
Sep 2014

Though many are basically the same reasons, they're all deeply individual.

I now want to apologize for the characterization of being closeted. That was wrong.

I respect everyone's reason.

I do hope people continue to respond. I find it very interesting.

Thank you very much to all that have responded.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
82. To me it's a matter of control, privacy and management of ones time
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:27 AM
Sep 2014

As long as nobody knows who I am I can be online and communicate with others on my schedule. Once people become aware of my identity they are in possession of other, more invasive means of communication.

I don't want somebody calling me on the phone to argue a point I made online. We all of other things to do with our time and I want to be in control of that time.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
83. I had my life threatened once on DU by DU Mail. Today, anyone, can be physically located.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:28 AM
Sep 2014

It's not wise for one to blast their name out across the world with views, etc. It extends far beyond privacy. It is good common sense. ... really, about no matter what one says or does, some people are going to hate one and some are unhinged enough to take action against one in various ways.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
121. I understand that
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:23 PM
Sep 2014

and I understand there is obviously a much wider reach when online. But, that's true in real life too. Just crazy people everywhere.

Thank you!!

Response to marym625 (Original post)

marym625

(17,997 posts)
123. Hi Ann!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:25 PM
Sep 2014

Congrats on your 1000th post, the one you made right after this one!!

Yeah, that's pretty much what I think. Someone really wants to find you, they will.

Thanks you

Response to marym625 (Reply #123)

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
86. There is very little reason for using your personal information and
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:50 AM
Sep 2014

a myriad of reasons to maintain personal privacy. Most of the time, the topics on DU concern universal issues.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
125. I think it's just the opposite
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:28 PM
Sep 2014

but we're all different. Good thing. Too bad some as SO different

valerief

(53,235 posts)
87. I take it you haven't had someone threaten to kill you on DU.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:52 AM
Sep 2014

Or any other board, for that matter.

I was glad I had a fake name when I was threatened.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
126. Not anything I took seriously
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:30 PM
Sep 2014

I have seen threats to others I took seriously, but not to me.

Don't know if I would change anything if I did. Had my job threatened and called but not my life. I am truly sorry that you, and everyone that has been threatened, had to deal with that.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
92. i think there are many good reasons to not use real names BUT
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:16 AM
Sep 2014

anonymity makes us more likely to be assholes on the regular

marym625

(17,997 posts)
127. No doubt.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:32 PM
Sep 2014

And you're the first one to say that. Was wondering if that would come up. Good for you!

Thanks!

:headbang"

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
94. Given the frequency of identity theft. .
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:54 AM
Sep 2014

.. why would I want to give thieves one more avenue into my personal information? It's unfortunately not a completely friendly world.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
129. I have no idea what the actual statitics are
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:34 PM
Sep 2014

but I would bet that there's more identity theft from major sites being hacked than any other way. But, I agree, a valid point. Thank you

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
95. Plus...back in the day it was normal to use a made up name.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:59 AM
Sep 2014

Back in the early zeroes (and even before that) it was all about having an avatar and an alter ego in chat rooms and discussion sites.

The internet was a free-for-all, a more chaotic space where the normal rules didn't apply.

FWIW my username looks like a real name but that was by accident as I based it on the name of a character on West Wing...but I misheard it!

marym625

(17,997 posts)
131. That's funny!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:37 PM
Sep 2014

I LOVE CJ on West Wing! My favorite scene was when some group showed her what the earth would really look like.

Back in the day... my very first aol name was merrymath. Mary and any thing with mathieu was taken. Everyone thought I was a gay, male math teach

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
96. I don't know who I'm talking TO
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:59 AM
Sep 2014

I don't wear my name and address on my forehead, or taped to my coat. I don't identify myself to every Tom, Dick and Harry I pass by. The information you suggest is exposed to the world. Truth is, it is fairly easy to figure out who I am if one is interested. But otherwise I'm not prone to publishing everything for the Russian mafia to collect.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
98. Anonymity is a fine default for the exchange of ideas.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:21 PM
Sep 2014

Anyone who feels a need to brand him or herself can do so, but I usually prefer opinions and arguments that come unattached to real-world authority or infamy.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
133. I don't think anyone is wrong for using an alias
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:40 PM
Sep 2014

I was just curious about the reasons. I am, usually, proud of what I have to say. This isn't a post I would be proud of but I have had a couple. I have no problem with anyone know what I think and why I think it. But I don't think any less of someone who does not want to use their real name.

bhikkhu

(10,720 posts)
192. Anonymity definitely is a form of freedom
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 07:50 PM
Sep 2014

It can, of course, be used to be a complete low-brow asshole online, as anyone who's read on some other forums can understand.

But I remember back in 2002 when I joined here, feeling like the RW agenda was seriously closing and locking up the loop on power. that there might not ever be another free and fair election, and that there would be long-term consequences for divergent viewpoints. Fortunately, things have changed, but at the time anonymity online (and the "underground" name itself) was a very welcome antidote to fear, and allowed me personally a place to speak freely, and to listen to others speaking freely.

ellenfl

(8,660 posts)
99. i have wondered the same. i use at least my first name (ellen) and usually my state (fl).
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 02:33 PM
Sep 2014

some nom de plumes make for weird salutations.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
101. I'm not ashamed of my political beliefs, and I thank you for the advance judgement.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 02:45 PM
Sep 2014

For me, the first time I ever heard of using one's real name as an online handle was back in 2007 when Facebook became popular. Arcane is pretty ubiquitous now but it wasn't so much when I first got online in 1998.

Forcing people to use their real names is a stupid thing to do, and if someone wants to use a handle, there is nothing wrong with that.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
105. Best answer on the thread.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:37 PM
Sep 2014
Forcing people to use their real names is a stupid thing to do, and if someone wants to use a handle, there is nothing wrong with that.


The authoritarians are working on other plans, though. Soon enough we will all be forced to use an internet ID.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
110. "... well, if you have nothing to hide!"
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:49 PM
Sep 2014

Damn, that expression drives me up the wall, just how F'en stupid some can be. ... not picking on the OP. Just that I've had people tell me that. I just can't deal with fucked stupid people anymore. They are over the place.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
139. so glad you added about the OP
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:50 PM
Sep 2014

Because I feel the same way. People who think what our government is doing is okay because they have "nothing to hide" are just plain STUPID.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
153. Yep! I thought it was a good question, marym625. I wish we could ALL be more open. What our
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:08 PM
Sep 2014

government is doing today really freaks me out, because I really wonder where it will be some years from now, and what if there is another 9/11 or something. It will go berserk with invasive surveillance. Having "nothing to hide" is always relative to whom someone is hiding something from. Governments change.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
162. I cannot understand
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:22 PM
Sep 2014

the rationale behind supporting an invasive government that breaks the law and then tries to defend that.

Though there were obvious other things happening prior to it, the Patriot Act was when we kissed our civil rights good-bye.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
194. Many Americans are brainwashed. They are conditioned to believe, but never to
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:12 PM
Sep 2014

question their beliefs, but only those that differ from theirs. Hence, they are fodder for control, all one has to do is push the right buttons. Therefore, they fell right in line for the Patriot Act.



marym625

(17,997 posts)
195. True. Actually
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:22 PM
Sep 2014

That's true with questioning doctors. Too many people just accept something they know feels wrong.
Thanks

marym625

(17,997 posts)
137. Which is horrid
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:46 PM
Sep 2014

I completely agree. And losing net neutrality will bring us one step closer.

I NEVER even came close to implying people should be forced to use their real names.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
135. I agree
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:44 PM
Sep 2014

and I apologized for the judgement. But, I will do it again. I'm sorry. It was wrong to say what I said.

Thank you

Louisiana1976

(3,962 posts)
102. II like using a pen name for privacy reasons. And to confuse anyone who might want to find me--
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:24 PM
Sep 2014

I don't even live in Louisiana.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
138. I guess because I would never try to find someone
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:48 PM
Sep 2014

it's just not something I worry about. But I do like the idea of trying to confuse people.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
104. My car was keyed in real life for having DU and John Kerry bumper stickers...
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:31 PM
Sep 2014

so that gave me a taste of the right wing/Republican idiots that infest my area. We liberals are well known for tolerance and not resorting to violence, in general (some activists and sixties' radicals notwithstanding). The right wing is infamous for using violence and murder to further their aims.

I would not put it past a local Freeper to physically assault me. I'd say you're very brave.

xmas74

(29,675 posts)
107. I live in a small, conservative town
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:40 PM
Sep 2014

and I have an unusual first name.

A couple of years ago I actually heard someone in my town make comments about the "looneys" posting on that "Democrat underground" and how he enjoyed reading and chuckling about it. He also said if he ever met any of those "treasonous bastards" in real life he'd have no problems using them for target practice.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
108. people in deep blue areas don't understand....
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:43 PM
Sep 2014

The rest of us have to live with these violent fuckwads, or at least they profess to be violent.

xmas74

(29,675 posts)
111. Yep.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:53 PM
Sep 2014

During the 2004 election I had sodas thrown at my car, had someone try to scrape my bumper sticker off my car, someone else used a sharpie on it, cigarette butts dumped on the hood (I think someone emptied their ashtray), and one person left me a note about how they saw the car seat and wanted to let me know that I was a horrible parent for supporting a party full of "baby killers" and a few other words I won't even use.

I also had a few punks attempt to follow me home, one of them trying to actually run my car off the road until I pulled in to work. (I believe that was an "oh no" moment, since I worked for a police department at the time.) He pulled off quickly but unfortunately for him I had his license plate number. And I know it was about politics because they screamed at me about being a "liberal c*nt".

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
113. wow glad you're ok
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:05 PM
Sep 2014

I think I've had people pull up next to me and yell at me for my DU and John Kerry stickers. I could not hear what they were yelling, so they didn't get the effect they wanted. I can't think of any other reason I would be getting yelled at, unless it's just being silly.

xmas74

(29,675 posts)
183. This was a heavy Bush county
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 07:18 PM
Sep 2014

in what has become a red state. 2004 was the absolute worst of it all.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
145. That truly sucks
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:58 PM
Sep 2014

I'm sorry that happened. I don't understand people. I can't fathom becoming violent over someone's political beliefs.

Hope you're safe now.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
144. YIKES
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:56 PM
Sep 2014

man, that's just some sick shit. Glad I live in a liberal area. Lived in KY for a few years. That was frightening so I get where you're coming from.

Thank you

xmas74

(29,675 posts)
186. That's a good reason enough to not use your name on a forum
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 07:22 PM
Sep 2014

that identifies you and your beliefs. Too many nosy people in the world and some do not have your best interests at heart.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
189. Someone posted a link to an older
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 07:27 PM
Sep 2014

Older post by mortos in this thread. It is how I feel too.

Not at all saying anyone should do anything they're not comfortable with. Just how I feel about it.

Thank you for your response. Truly

marym625

(17,997 posts)
151. I thought I replied to you
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:06 PM
Sep 2014

but I don't see it.

What a horrible thing to say. People just amaze me. Sorry you have to live with that around you.

Thanks you

xmas74

(29,675 posts)
188. But not surprising
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 07:25 PM
Sep 2014

in an area that could easily stock a militia. Lots of guns and gays voters around here, along with a fear of a woman making her own decisions.

Lots of people with nothing better to do with their time, either, than to troll message boards and cause trouble.

I've never understood the mentality. At least it's not as bad here as it was in 2004. That was a real low point in my area.

Bragi

(7,650 posts)
112. My daughter is a prominent journalist
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:00 PM
Sep 2014

Were I to use my real name, I know she'd constantly get skewered by partisans for her father's extreme left views so I always post anonymously.

(Even if that weren't so, I admit I'd probably still post anonymously, but at least she gives me an easy excuse to do so.)

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
117. Because there is always a small minority on any internet group who can be malicious and cause troubl
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:13 PM
Sep 2014

I was once on another political forum (NOT Discussionist, to forestall misunderstandings); where the host suddenly decided to get paranoid about me and my reasons for being on the board, and tried to ring me at work from 3000 miles away. They 'outed' me on an irrelevant forum to which they also belonged, giving my name and workplace, which they'd managed to find as a result of my using my real name to register though I never used it on the board; and ridiculed me there (these posts were soon deleted by that other forum's hosts). This was disconcerting enough when I was on a different continent from the person; if they were closer to me, I'd have been quite worried.

That was fairly mild. I know of boards that have been very keen on digging up personal 'dirt' on people on other boards, whose politics they oppose, and in some cases trying to get them sacked from their jobs, prevented from getting some form of medical treatment, etc. Even death threats.

This is apart from people who could face severe backlash from relatives or employers just for being openly left-wing.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
149. what a horrible, paranoid person
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:04 PM
Sep 2014

I'm sorry that happened.

As I said to someone else here, I have a boss that is a liberal and knows everything about me, I have no kids to worry about. It's different for me.

I completely understand.

Paladin

(28,269 posts)
122. Engage in heated arguments with pro-gunners for a while, then get back to us.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:24 PM
Sep 2014

After a death threat or two (and I've received several, over the years), it's funny how your perspective changes. The safety of yourself and your loved ones gets drawn into sharp focus, Ms. Mathieu. And empty, uninformed taunts about being "ashamed of...political beliefs" don't count for much.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
155. I have. Many many times
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:12 PM
Sep 2014

For the third time on this thread, I will apologize for that remark.

For the first time, I will say this is not uniformed as to what can happen and happens constantly. I may not be a long time DUer but I am far from new to this.

I also stated that I understand there are reasons for using a handle.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
158. It is not an unwarranted deduction
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:15 PM
Sep 2014

Last edited Wed Sep 17, 2014, 01:17 AM - Edit history (1)

Nor is it ignorant. And it seems, in some cases, I was right.

I am sorry I offended you.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
128. Because
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:33 PM
Sep 2014

There are really mean people in this world and they will do really mean things to you for no other reason than pure enjoyment. Providing them access to your real name and location makes it that much easier for them to do mean things to you.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
130. I actually do use mine for a couple of reasons.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:34 PM
Sep 2014

One, it serves as a check to try to make me remember not to get too sarcastic, or insulting. (Not that I always succeed, but I'd probably be worse if I were pseudonymous.)

Two, what the heck, maybe it'll serve some future collateral ancestor (not direct, no kids) as source material for genealogy and history work I'm not planning on writing 'my memoirs', but a lot of things that have happened in my life while online I've posted at places that keep archived copies of it all, so as long as they're around, so will be my original writings, trite as they may be.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
159. I love that reason
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:19 PM
Sep 2014

I have seen some excellent writing, even here on DU, stolen and used under someone else's name because the original author uses an alias. It's a shame. Even proving the post with the alias came first, because of work, this person can't ever claim authorship.

Thank you

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
163. If I've got any excellent writing, it's probably by accident.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:23 PM
Sep 2014

I largely tested out of English classes in college, and have long regretted that I never actually did take any college courses on writing, especially since one of my best friends has a PhD in English. It would have been fun to have taken one of the classes she taught while I was doing my own graduate work in other departments.

ismnotwasm

(41,998 posts)
136. Can't I'm a nurse
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:44 PM
Sep 2014

One of you all could be my patient. Someone from FR could be my patient. When caring for people, political discussions are not what I focus on, and I wouldn't want it in my way.

nolabear

(41,990 posts)
141. Because you don't know who's reading.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:52 PM
Sep 2014

Even with pseudonyms people have been harassed in RL. Not an epidemic, but enough.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
146. Before this facebook social networking BS
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:58 PM
Sep 2014

It was common knowledge that using your real name online constitute a safety risk. I still subscribe to this belief and hence, I do not do it.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
154. I used to use my name in posts
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:09 PM
Sep 2014

but stopped since Skinner and I have the same name and people sometimes made assumptions that I was Skinner, etc.

I still do on occasion when I want to make it plain that I stand behind what I say, but then I include a disclaimer:

David Allen
(Not Skinner).

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
157. Oh, I thought we were all using our real names.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:15 PM
Sep 2014

I was wondering why so many parents gave their children names with numbers, but I didn't want to be rude so I never brought it up.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
160. I've had multiple dear friends driven off-line due to anti-feminist activism.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:20 PM
Sep 2014

There are literally organized anti-feminist groups that do nothing but try to destroy the lives of women who have the temerity to speak out. I honestly have many better things to do than deal with MRA stalker jerks, though funny enough, I don't deal with them often because I believe in public shaming of jerks.

My personal philosophy is this: any abusive comment I receive will be republished entirely intact, including whatever contact information and IP info I receive. I will also grade it, on content, originality, spelling and grammar. On my personal site, I have that prominently posted. Here, I am not allowed to do that. My personal site has some of my contact information, but not my location, and I keep my physical info tightly held there because I have seen friends whose houses have been watched, whose pets' vets have been called to report abuse, who have been SWATted or accused of drug offenses, who have received hundreds of late night phone calls. Thanks, no thanks.

My Disqus profile connects to my personal site, so I use a variation of my name on Disqus (though I use my far more common last name than my uncommon first name).

My DU handle dates from an earlier phase of my online presence, when I was still trying to keep my physical information from persons with whom I share DNA, and when others at my university were getting serious blowback for unpopular opinions.

Since I believe all politics are local, here, I want to be able to talk about local issues. Thus, I try not to associate my IRL or website/blog/Disqus with my DU ID.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
169. Thank you
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:30 PM
Sep 2014

for that answer. Good for you!

I dealt with those asshats for a while, the MRA insanity groups. I had more problems with the HIP and HAM groups. Same kind of jerks.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
175. Asshats they are!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:42 PM
Sep 2014

Heterosexual Awareness Month. I forget what HIP stands for. They all part of the National Organization for Marriage.

Here's an old article about them. REally horrible people. They definitely try to get personal information on people and use it against them. Dealt with them for a few years.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/everything-you-need-to-know-about-heterosexual-pr#1jnme8

samsingh

(17,600 posts)
161. it is something prudent to have a handle
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:22 PM
Sep 2014

I made up a name when I registered years ago and it also becomes too difficult to change.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
167. Anonymity is a double-edged sword.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:28 PM
Sep 2014

It can protect people whose might suffer if trouble makers want to cause trouble. Stalkers and harassers are a definite issue there. And some people, because of their jobs might have to be more careful. And nowadays employers usually search the profiles of prospective employees, so your opinions or activities might come back to haunt you. And it is necessary to protect dissidents in countries that are less than free.

BUT at the same time, people can hide behind anonymity to harass and intimidate others as well. People just behave abysmally on the internet, especially when they can be anonymous. I mean, have you read any YouTube comments? :shudder:

So some have called for anonymity to be banned, on the theory that if people know who you are, you are more likely to behave appropriately. I'm not really sure that is true.

I have never really attempted to be totally anonymous, figuring that I am such a small fish that no one really cares what I do. My user names are the same pretty much anywhere and are usually some version of my actual name. Also, I'd forget anything else.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
170. That's how I feel
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:32 PM
Sep 2014

Pretty much summed it up for me. Even the "I'd forget anything else." Cracked me up!!

Thank you!

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
168. There are extremely creepy people at this website who like to research other posters
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:28 PM
Sep 2014

Several people have answered your OP by talking about creeps on the Internet who will chase down your personal history if given a chance. But there are long-time posters at this very website who are in the habit of checking other posters' utterances at other websites in order to use that information against them. You don't need to go far to find dangerous, creepy, maladjusted sickos who want nothing more than to find your real identity in order to cause trouble.

And no, this has not been done to me, but it's happened to several others, and it's a known and verifiable thing.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
173. I believe you
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:36 PM
Sep 2014

It's sad, but I believe you.

Someone wants to know what I have said elsewhere, let find it. I do understand how that could be an issue for some.

Man, some people need a life.

Thanks for the response!

drray23

(7,637 posts)
177. i used to post on huffington post
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:46 PM
Sep 2014

And had to leave when they decided to force people to post with their facebook account and require that it be a verified account with a real name.

I do not want my political opinions to affect other areas of my life or my family. I have a high profile job and do not wish to inject politics into it and involve the organization i work for.





marym625

(17,997 posts)
181. I didn't realize they did that
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:52 PM
Sep 2014

It's a shame that you can't write an article under your real name. I understand, just think it's sucks that people have to worry about jobs and family for having certain beliefs.

Thank you for sharing that

marym625

(17,997 posts)
178. Amazing how many different responses
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:47 PM
Sep 2014

and yet, pretty much the same.

Thank you, everyone, that responded. Especially those that shared personal stories. I truly appreciate that.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
179. Because if the women of DU knew my real name
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:47 PM
Sep 2014

they would be all over me, and the last thing I'd want are a bunch of jealous DU husbands

marym625

(17,997 posts)
180. Oh, to hide celebrity is definitely a good reason!
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:49 PM
Sep 2014

Can't have jealous DU husbands.

Did I mention I'm single? HA HA

Thanks for that!

LiberalArkie

(15,727 posts)
193. I can't ever use my real name who would want a logon of jeffjohnson1317868358136
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 08:01 PM
Sep 2014

there are just too many of use.. When I worked for a phone company, there were 6 of us in the corp registry.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
197. Interesting.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:33 PM
Sep 2014

I am a bit in the closet about my political beliefs, I suppose. But on the other hand, I have revealed some things about myself and been open and honest because my real name is not attached.

Also, I don't want psycho RW stalkers. That seems like the most legitimate reason of all!

marym625

(17,997 posts)
202. The only reason that isn't legitimate
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:21 AM
Sep 2014

I think anyway, is to harass someone.

I have seen some pretty nasty shit from people from both sides. But I think RWNJs seem to seek out people to harass.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
200. There is way to figure out my full name
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:53 PM
Sep 2014

I'm not going to give hints but if they knew where to look and who to ask, they could find it.

I prefer not to share it but I come close to using my real full name in my handle.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
203. Now I can't decide if
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:24 AM
Sep 2014

I want to try to solve the puzzle or not.

Well, not really. If you wanted to share outright that's one thing. But you don't or you would. But that's an interesting way to do it. Cool!

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
204. I've also been online since the 80s
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:24 AM
Sep 2014

My first modem was a 300 baud unit in my Commodore64. We must have visited different places because I learned before the 80s were over to stop using my real name.

I do use my real name on Facebook but all my friends and family already know I am a liberal atheist and my profile is locked to all but friends so casual perusers can't find much to hold anything against me but this and other forums are far more wide open to the rest of the world and many out in that world would fuck with a guy just for fun if they had half a chance.

I ain't trying to make it easy for those assholes.


Probably already said too much.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
206. I understand that
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:31 AM
Sep 2014

But I still would rather use my name. I have been around as long as you. I did have my Facebook locked down but I left Facebook a while ago.

I appreciate your response. Truly

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
207. The design of DU predates the "social" Internet
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:33 AM
Sep 2014

Until the mid oughts, non-anonymous Web fora were basically unknown. Most were like DU where you came up with a handle and filled out a few non-identifying pieces of profile information.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
208. I guess I don't remember it that well.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:38 AM
Sep 2014

But since there were chat rooms I always used something that was my real name/info. But it seems like it was before the mid oughts that there were social sites that required real information. AOL was way back.

applegrove

(118,749 posts)
210. People often do not talk politics at work
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 01:09 AM
Sep 2014

because they do not feel they should put their personal politics out in a place that is not personal. Are you aware that just a few weeks ago a study came out that said people were reluctant to talk politics online in general. Good that the DU exists where people feel freer to discuss what is in their hearts with like people, where, because of anonymity, they don‘t have to worry that future employers will judge them. Or advertisers. If I was the GOP and wanted to debase the DU, given the recent study that says people are reluctant to talk openly about politics on the internet, I would try to change the great working culture at the DU , in the way you suggest.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
211. In the way I suggest?
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 01:14 AM
Sep 2014

I didn't suggest anything.

No, I was not aware of that study. I will look it up though. Thanks for the information

applegrove

(118,749 posts)
212. You did say “It seems odd to me“.... Which implies
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 01:34 AM
Sep 2014

a negative when in fact the anonymity of the DU allows for passion and honesty and really makes this site what it is... open to democrats to discuss authentically what they want in political leadership with no possible threat of retribution.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
214. and that suggests to you
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 03:09 AM
Sep 2014

That I am a GOPer trying to ruin everything? Wow . That's a leap.

I have no problem with anyone using an alias. If people can't be passionate with using their own name that's sad to me but I understand it and have no problem with it.

I do have a problem with cowards who hide behind ame alias to attack.

Whatever you want to believe. Enjoy.

applegrove

(118,749 posts)
216. I just don‘t think we should be weakening
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 04:29 AM
Sep 2014

Last edited Wed Sep 17, 2014, 03:52 PM - Edit history (1)

what we have that is wonderful. That is the GOP‘s job. To take thing apart. We need the DU to be a safe place.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
218. Because it's a big risk
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 07:13 AM
Sep 2014

If you anger the wrong person online and they can find your address through your name, you can get yourself killed, "swatted", your home vandalized, you-don't-know-what...

There are so many more people online than in real life digesting your political beliefs every day, even when you're not online...it just takes one sicko to see your message...

I'll also add that I have been threatened online before under one of my various fake user names. Once when I actually agreed with someone on immigration (I took the usual Left interpretation) but who didn't want my defense because they turned out to be a racist who then violently threatened me! What would have happened if they had my real name?

marym625

(17,997 posts)
221. It's a risk I am willing to take
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 08:23 AM
Sep 2014

The worst online crap I ever was subjected to, that went into real life shit, came from fellow liberals. Biggest asshats out there, this particular group of insecure idiots.

Here's a link that Screamingmeamie (hope I have that right) put in her response to this thread yesterday. It's awesome. It's how I feel about it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025543180


I understand people erring on the side of caution. That's their right to do.

Thank you for your response. I do appreciate it

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
245. It's one thing to not be ashamed of your political affiliation
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 11:01 AM
Sep 2014

It's another to be stupid about it.

If I'm in a face to face with someone, I'm not going to hide my politics. That way I know to whom, when and where I've made my politics public.

But in the case of the internet, where you know nothing about the person on the other side and they know everything about you because you gave it to them...well, I'm sorry that's just a amateurish mistake. Someone could take your information to target you for abuse of any kind and you might not know who or where that abuse is coming from.

Unless you are already well known any way, that is a very big mistake and I don't encourage DUers to use their real names. If anything, I encourage the opposite.

And I have to be honest, I am suspicious of someone who would encourage it and I think others on this board should be too. Sorry.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
246. No need for sorry.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 11:40 AM
Sep 2014

However, I am not encouraging it. I wanted to know and now I know. I'm not encouraging anyone to do anything they don't feel is right.

Thank you for responding. I do appreciate it.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
220. It's about privacy.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 08:18 AM
Sep 2014

I'm really big on privacy. My positions on that issue are more extreme than the norm. For example, I don't think anyone should be allowed to take my picture, or a video, or any image or audio of any kind, involving me without my express permission. Which they wouldn't get. I definitely don't want to be found when googled, outside of the website my employer maintains. I don't even use my last name on Facebook.

That, and when you are talking to tens of thousands of people that you'll never meet, it's another layer of protection. For example, right here at DU a few years back there was a poster who didn't like what I said, and somehow followed a trail back to me, and answered back with PERSONAL INFORMATION. That was really creepy, and thankfully the admins dealt with it swiftly.

Also, I DO have a job that makes publicizing my political opinions a problem.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
222. What I find surprising
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 08:31 AM
Sep 2014

Is that your opinions would be considered extreme. The idea that because someone uses social media, everything about them is fair game, or that your private information can be sold from company to company. All that horrible invasion stuff.

I understand your position and completely agree it is more than reasonable to use an alias if you so choose.

Thanks for your response!

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
224. Cyberstalking
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 08:37 AM
Sep 2014

About 8 years ago, I was cyberstalker over a completely non-political issue. It was a horrible experience.

And with technology today, I can only imagine it is that much easier to do so.

No "real" name, here. It's one of the reasons I have lurked for years, but never joined.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
227. I use a screen name because
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 08:55 AM
Sep 2014

1. Almost everyone does, the software requests it and it did not even occur me not to but.

2. If it had occurred to me, I would still use a screen name because some people who read and/or post on message board are batshit crazy and I would rather not have a one on one "meet up" with nutters in my bedroom one evening

I have posted many times that I live in Boston and some these nutters will study and catalogue every post you've written until they know way too much about you.

Or they will befriend you, ask a lot of questions about you, where you live, your kids' names, etc. and seem perfectly friendly and totally sane----until they don't.

I had both those unfortunate experiences before I joined this board. Now, I don't even give my real name when I open a hotmail account and I don't even use the same screen name on more than one message board. I am not ashamed of anything I post, just burned twice and thrice shy.

I am very willing to die or suffer physically for good reason. I don't consider putting TMI on a message boar a good reason, though. So, merrily it is.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
229. Thank you
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:01 AM
Sep 2014

Using an alias after having a history having to deal with insanity is more than reasonable. It's a personal choice and the only unreasonable use is to troll people.

Thank you

merrily

(45,251 posts)
233. You're welcome.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:12 AM
Sep 2014

In the early days of message boards, I was very naive about this. Even gave out my address to someone who said she was going to Cape Cod (from the West Coast, no less) and wanted to stop by and say hello on her way. I should have told her I'd meet her at the airport or something, but, as I said, I was naive. For that matter, I didn't even know then if she was even a woman.




marym625

(17,997 posts)
234. cute cartoon
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:18 AM
Sep 2014

And so true.

I am not naive (anymore) but I am not going to live in fear either. But, as I have said many times on this thread, that's a personal choice and whatever anyone wants to do is fine.

Yeah, that show Catfish has shown how many people lie about who they are. If you haven't seen it, you should check it out. Good lesson in trust.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
235. I don't live in fear.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:22 AM
Sep 2014

As I said, I am very, very willing to suffer physically or die or go to prison for good reason. I just don't think oversharing personal info on the internet is a good reason.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
236. incorrect characterization
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:26 AM
Sep 2014

Sorry. I really don't know how to say this without it probably coming off badly. I mean no disrespect and I am not judging. I just feel like, if I am using an alias to post my beliefs, they win. My personal feelings.

I understand your position and I believe it is a good one.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
237. Oh, I didn't think you were judging me at all.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:33 AM
Sep 2014

I knew from the start that you were speaking for yourself.

RobinA

(9,894 posts)
228. I Use My Real Name
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 08:59 AM
Sep 2014

it keeps me from saying things I shouldn't. I do have a job that somewhat limits what I want traced back to me. I don't really think that using a handle will keep a dedicated agancy from tracking me down, so I don't use one. I simply don'y post what I don't want my name on. Plus, I generally think it keeps people honest.

I have used a handle on occasion, for instance on a small neighborhood forum where my friend who lived in the neighborhood was persona non grata. I have also used handles when the subject of the forum involves someone I know, such as mental health forums.

When it's just me, I use my name. I make it a policy not to express opinions, in the Internet or otherwise, either anonymously or under an alias.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
231. Good policy
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:05 AM
Sep 2014

It is too easy to find out who someone is. It's a strange world we live in.

Thank you for sharing, Robin.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
230. Red state
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:02 AM
Sep 2014

I live in a very red state and am a state employee. They have fired folks for posting comments against the NRA on twitter. I don't want to deal with that.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
232. Holy crap
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:07 AM
Sep 2014

Well there's a HUGE statement on corporate America! Don't dis the NRA or get fired! From a government job! Wow.

Thank you for the response!

rppper

(2,952 posts)
239. The R and P in rppper are my initials
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:48 AM
Sep 2014

And my family does call me "rip" or RP, so my handle is just a play on words really...beyond that, and don't take this the wrong way, that's as far as I'm willing to go with my identity on an open political board that's under scrutiny by people who see liberals/anyone left of Attila the Hun as an enemy.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
240. left of Attila the Hun!
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 09:55 AM
Sep 2014

LMAO! I love that, Rip! Thanks for the laugh out loud.


Even if I promise not to tell anyone? Really. I swear.
I don't take that as an insult at all. You're allowed to do as you see best. More power to you.

Thank you for your response.

PS. On edit - stupid auto correct. But my phone doesn't even know the word "gay" so I shouldn't be surprised

rppper

(2,952 posts)
242. Well, I do post pictures....
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 10:09 AM
Sep 2014

On those lounge threads that pop up every now and again....look for me!

The Attila comment was borrowed from my mother, who was a proud Texan and a proud democrat until the end. Share it with everyone, she'd be proud to have it happen!

marym625

(17,997 posts)
243. I will.
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 10:17 AM
Sep 2014

I almost just wrote, "give me her name and I will give her credit. " Then I laughed at myself

Ms. Toad

(34,085 posts)
244. If you are able to post under your real name in an ungated community
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 10:50 AM
Sep 2014

without understanding why people don't use real names is a privilege - and I use that red flag word choice deliberately.

I rarely post online in an ungated community using my real name. In a world where LGBT individuals are still all too regularly threatened with violence, a world where individuals with mental illnesses are demonized, a world where people with criminal records cannot find meaningful work despite crime free decades - as just a few examples, those who can post online without serious thought are indeed privileged. Exercising that privilege - to the extent it becomes the norm - stigmatizes those who are unable to do so without accepting significant risk. So I am glad that places like DU exist where using a psuedonym is the norm, rather than the exception.

I am completely out (as a lesbian) in real life - this week I gave a presentation to 100+ community members, most of whom I don't know - but which included a few students currently in my classes, at a forum sponsored by my employer. Being out in real life is still a very limited risk - although it did generate hate mail from Fred Phelps before he became famous, when he found my name and address in library materials in connection with a national LGBT organization for which I served as an officer (before the internet was a much more efficient vehicle). Had that document Fred Phelps found in print in a library been online - making it far easier to find by those with much less ambition but perhaps a greater inclination to violence, it could have been far worse than a post card.

When you are part of a stigmatized group, it takes some effort to be out on a one-to-one basis (many cannot even manage that effort). It takes more to be out in a larger in-person forum - or a gated internet forum, where the reach of your speech is largely limited to those present. It is an exponential increase to be willing to be out using your real name in an ungated online forum.

I speak from personal experience, because I recently engaged in that exercise - ironically to fight for the option to use pseudonyms in a forum which intended to be a place where everyone brought all of themselves to the forum so that - for example - when the discussion was same gender marriage, if you had a personal interest in the issue you were expected to disclose it. I made the choice to join the forum - which I believed was an important experiment in public discourse - to make the point that requiring real names meant the forum would fail because a truly diverse population is unlikely to be willing to engage fully and openly using their full names in a forum that can be read by every Tom, Dick, and Harry with a penchant for engaging in physical or psychological violence. After participating in that forum for around 2 years, there was still only one other openly LGBT individual - and even a superficial look at his "name" made it clear that he was getting around the real name requirement by spelling out his initials. The forum was selected to host a series of discussions on mental health - discussions which failed miserably because those most impacted were unwilling to disclose their experiences with mental illness to the world, or as family members felt they did not have the right to disclose the mental illness status of family members who would be identifiable if they used their real names.

I knew that it would take more of my energy to be out in a permanently archived, universally searchable, forum. Even knowing what to expect, and having had 33 years of experience being out in one-on-one settings and in less personal testimonial type settings, I was amazed at how much more energy it took - and the number of times someone I had not specifically come out to would say something to me in a suggestive veiled threat kind of way that suggested I had been deliberately researched. And I'm absolutely safe, from a job perspective, well educated, white, lesbian (relatively privileged as to risk categories within the LGBT community). I can't imagine what it would have taken for a trans woman of color to make that leap - as some do.

Your statement that, "Makes me think people are ashamed of their political beliefs" is the reality of what people think when the norm is to use a real name - that people using pseudonyms have something to be ashamed of. That is precisely why I used the word privilege in connection with your ability to use your real name without understanding why others do not. It would never occur to me that using a pseudonym came from a place of shame, rather than a realistic concern for safety.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
247. Quite a bit there
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:42 PM
Sep 2014

First, as I have said more than a few times now, I am sorry for the characterization of people being ashamed. Though it turns out it is a correct statement in some cases, more than anything, it is not. I also stated I understand their are reasons to use an alias.

As to the "privileged" connotation, again, I have stated many times in this thread, that I realize I am not the norm in being able to freely use my name. I have no family to worry about, my job is secure and my boss is ALMOST as liberal as I am. No one would want my identity (give them more trouble than help) and a multitude of other reasons. Privileged is a way to look at it.

I have dealt with RWNJ, gunnuts, homophobes (been out for years to everyone) liberals who feel it's their way or no way, etc. I have been out to everyone for years. The only and worst real life attack on me, stemming from online activity, came from "liberals."

I do not have an issue with someone using an alias. More power to them. I choose not to. People can think I'm stupid and/or naive. I was curious as to the reasons.

I thank you for your reply. Truly.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
248. There are some very sick people on the internet who have no qualms about...
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 01:28 PM
Sep 2014

stalking people in real life. You never know who is watching or who will get angry over something you've written. Better to be safe than sorry.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
250. That's true. There are
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 05:49 PM
Sep 2014

But that's true everywhere. Even if you're just walking down he street and didn't say a word.

Though, I understand where you are coming from and have no issue with someone using an alias.

thank you

Peace

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just curious why so few p...