General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Chevron PR website pretends to be an objective news source
Source: Los Angeles Times
If you happened to click Monday on the Richmond Standard, a community news site for that Bay Area locality, you would have come upon a fairly snarky piece about 170 activists ("some from Richmond" who took a train cross-country to participate in the People's Climate March in New York on Sunday.
"Talk about a disturbed climate," the item began. It proceeded to describe how the activists were boisterous, rude, messy, and smelly -- enough to "rankle" the other passengers and even the conductors. All in all, a pretty negative picture of some of the participants in a rally that brought together 400,000 people ("some from Richmond" to demand action on climate.
You might think this was an objective news report, unless you recognized that the Richmond Standard isn't just another site for "community-driven news," as it declares on its banner. It's entirely a creation of Chevron Corp., which operates a huge and controversial refinery in, yes, Richmond, and presumably doesn't have the same view of climate change as the activists on the train.
This is what the news business has come to in communities where economics have wiped out traditional local newspapers. Self-interested corporations have stepped into the vacuum. You'd be hard-pressed to find a case as flagrant as Richmond's.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-a-chevron-pr-website-20140922-column.html
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)tactics. Showing anyone who is against Fracking as a Cheetoes eating loon working out of their moms basement.
Maybe it's a Frank Luntz production.
TBF
(32,102 posts)why shouldn't all corporations do it?
And they will all be headquartered in Dubai so they don't have to pay taxes here. It's the American way.
Sopkoviak
(357 posts)It's at the top of every one of their pages. I wonder what part of "provide a voice for Chevron Richmond" he doesn't understand?
And what's worse is that his editors at the LA Times let it through making them look like idiots.
Trying to work up some outrage here. Nope, can't do it.